BILL NUMBER: AB 322 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 28, 2011 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 27, 2011 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 26, 2011 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Portantino (Coauthor: Assembly Member Fuentes) FEBRUARY 9, 2011 An act to add and repealSection 680.1Sections 680.1 and 680.2 of the Penal Code, relating to forensic evidence. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 322, as amended, Portantino. Forensic evidence: rape kits. Existing law, the Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights, authorizes a law enforcement agency investigating certain felony sex offenses, upon the request of the victim, and subject to the commitment of resources, to inform the victim whether or not a DNA profile was obtained from the testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence from the case, whether or not that information has been entered into the Department of Justice Data Bank of case evidence, and whether or not there is a match between the DNA profile developed from the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence and a DNA profile contained in the Department of Justice Convicted Offender DNA Data Base, as specified. Existing law also requires that the victim be given written notification by the law enforcement agency if the law enforcement agency elects not to perform DNA testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence, or intends to destroy or dispose of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, as specified. This bill would require local law enforcement agencies responsible for taking or collecting rape kit evidence to annually report to the Department of Justice statistical information pertaining to the testing and submission for DNA analysis of rape kits, as specified. The initial report would be due by July 1, 2013. The reports received by the department would be subject to inspection under the California Public Records Act. The bill would provide thatitsthose provisions would become inoperative on July 1, 2017, and would be repealed on January 1, 2018. By imposing additional reporting duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would establish a pilot program in 9 counties, commencing July 1, 2012, in which all rape kits collected in those counties after that date will be processed by the Department of Justice in department laboratories. The pilot program would be operative until January 1, 2015, provided however, the department may extend the pilot program for one year. The bill would provide that these provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2016. By imposing additional burdens on local law enforcement entities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 680.1 is added to the Penal Code, to read: 680.1. (a) Each local law enforcement agency responsible for taking or collecting rape kit evidence shall collect the following information for rape kits collected on or after January 1, 2012: (1) The total number of rape kits collected during the preceding calendar year and, of that total, the number of rape kits for which the identity of the assailant is unknown. (2) The total number of rape kits tested during the preceding calendar year and, of that total, the number of rape kits for which the identity of the assailant is unknown. (3) The total number of rape kits submitted for DNA analysis and, of that total, the number of rape kits for which the identity of the assailant is unknown. (4) The number of rape kits that law enforcement has submitted for DNA analysis that remain untested and, of that number, the number of rape kits for which the identity of the assailant is unknown. (5) The total number of untested rape kits that were not submitted for DNA analysis in its possession as of January 1 of the reporting year. (b) Each local law enforcement agency responsible for taking or collecting rape kit evidence shall report, by July 1 of each year, the information collected pursuant to this section during the preceding year to the Department of Justice. The initial report to the department pursuant to this subdivision shall be made by July 1, 2013. (c) The reports received by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) are subject to inspection under the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). (d) This section shall remain operative only until July 1, 2017, and shall be repealed on January 1, 2018, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2018, deletes or extends that date. SEC. 2. Section 680.2 is added to the Penal Code , to read: 680.2. (a) The Legislature finds and declares the following: (1) Existing law requires local law enforcement agencies in California to report to the Department of Justice the number of specified violent crimes reported in their jurisdictions in the prior year. These law enforcement agencies are also required to report the number of arrests for these crimes that occur in their jurisdictions in the prior year. (2) It is the intent of the Legislature to establish a pilot project in California to determine whether testing of all rape kits in California counties with low arrest rates for the crime of forcible rape will improve the number of arrests in these counties for that crime. (3) In 2009, forcible rapes accounted for 5 percent of all violent crimes reported statewide but only 1.7 percent of the arrests for violent crime. As reported on the Attorney General's Internet Web site, in 2009 there were 174,579 violent crimes reported. Of these crimes, 8,698 or 5 percent were for forcible rape. Of the arrests for violent crime reported in 2009, only 1.7 percent or 2,050 arrests were for the crime of forcible rape. (4) In 2009, the Department of Justice reported 8,698 forcible rapes in California. The number of arrests reported for 2009 was 2,050. This is a statewide arrest rate of 23.6%. In 1999, the arrest rate was 30.6; there were 2,887 arrests for forcible rape of the 9,443 forcible rapes that were reported. (b) The Department of Justice shall establish a pilot project, commencing July 1, 2012, in nine California counties to open and test all rape kits collected in those counties after the start of the pilot project. (c) The nine counties chosen for inclusion in this pilot project shall be counties with an arrest rate of less than 12 percent for the crime of forcible rape as reported to the Attorney General's office for the reporting periods 2007 to 2009, inclusive. The arrest rate shall be determined by adding the number of arrests for the crime of forcible rape reported in the county for this three-year period and dividing this amount by the number of forcible rapes reported during this time period. (d) The following counties shall be included in the pilot project based upon 2007 to 2009, inclusive, statistics reported to the Attorney General's office for the crime of forcible rape as follows: (1) Alpine County: 4 forcible rapes, 0 arrests, 0 percent arrest rate. (2) Amador County: 52 forcible rapes, 3 arrests, 5.8 percent arrest rate. (3) Colusa County: 20 forcible rapes, 2 arrests, 10 percent arrest rate. (4) El Dorado County: 118 forcible rapes, 12 arrests, 10.2 percent arrest rate. (5) Nevada County: 69 forcible rapes, 5 arrests, 7.2 percent arrest rate. (6) Plumas County: 46 forcible rapes, 2 arrests, 4 percent arrest rate. (7) Shasta County: 363 forcible rapes, 17 arrests, 4.7 percent arrest rate. (8) Tehama County: 42 forcible rapes, 1 arrest, 2.4 percent arrest rate. (9) Tuolumne County: 62 forcible rapes, 7 arrests, 11.3 percent arrest rate. (e) The Department of Justice shall, in cooperation with the pilot project county, establish a process regarding the collection, storage, and testing of rape kits collected in the pilot project county. It is the intent of the Legislature that all rape kits that are collected in the county after a date established by the department, shall be sent to a forensic laboratory of the department for analysis and testing. The department shall test every rape kit collected by a pilot project county for a crime committed during the period of the pilot project. (f) The purpose of this pilot project is to determine whether counties with the lowest arrest rates in California for the crime of forcible rape can bring justice to victims by increasing their arrest rates for this violent crime by having all rape kits that are collected in the county tested for evidence of crime. The effectiveness of this pilot project shall be measured by examining county statistics submitted to the Attorney General's office pursuant to existing law that requires the reporting of the number of forcible rapes committed in that county and the number of arrests for forcible rape committed in that county. (g) The pilot project shall be inoperative on January 1, 2015, provided however, that the department may extend the operation of the program by one year, until January 1, 2016. If the department extends the program, the department shall post a notice on its Internet Web site that the program has been extended, and shall provide written notice to the counties in the pilot program prior to January 1, 2015, that the program will be extended. (h) This section shall be repealed on January 1, 2016.SEC. 2.SEC. 3. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.