Amended
IN
Senate
July 27, 2020 |
Amended
IN
Senate
July 01, 2020 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
June 04, 2020 |
Introduced by Assembly Member Friedman |
February 21, 2020 |
(2)CEQA requires that all courts in which specified CEQA actions or proceedings are pending give those actions or proceedings preference over all other civil actions, including regulating the briefing schedule so that, to the extent feasible, a court commences hearings on an appeal within one year of the date of the filing of the appeal.
This bill would instead require that a court, to the extent feasible, commence hearings on an appeal within 270 days of the date of the filing of the appeal.
(3)CEQA requires in any action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with its provisions that the petitioner request a hearing within 90 days from the date of filing the petition, or the action or proceeding will be subject to dismissal, as specified. CEQA also requires that upon the filing of the
request by the petitioner for a hearing and upon application by any party that the court establish a briefing schedule and a hearing date so that briefing is generally completed within 90 days from the date that the request for a hearing is filed, with certain exceptions.
This bill would reduce the general period in which briefing should be completed from 90 to 60 days from the date that the request for a hearing is filed.
(4)
(5)
(6)CEQA requires a court to make specified remedial orders if it finds that any determination, finding, or decision of a public agency has been made without compliance with CEQA.
This bill would authorize a court to issue an interlocutory remand order if the court finds both that the order would promote judicial efficiency and expedition, and the public agency’s reconsideration on remand comports with due process and is not likely to result in a post hoc rationalization of the public agency’s actions. The bill would specify that these provisions do not prevent a court from entering a final judgment, affect the right of the parties to appeal that judgment, or affect the appropriate determination of attorney’s fees pursuant to a specified statute.
(a)In all actions or proceedings brought pursuant to Sections 21167, 21168, and 21168.5, including the hearing of an action or proceeding on appeal from a decision of a lower court, all courts in which the action or proceeding is pending shall give the action or proceeding preference over all other civil actions, in the matter of setting the action or proceeding for hearing or trial, and in hearing or trying the action or proceeding, so that the action or proceeding shall be quickly heard and determined. The court shall regulate the briefing schedule so that, to the extent feasible, the court shall commence hearings on an appeal within 270 days of the date of the filing of the appeal.
(b)To ensure that actions or proceedings brought pursuant to Sections 21167, 21168, and 21168.5 may be quickly heard and determined in the lower courts, the superior courts in all counties with a population of more than 200,000 shall designate one or more judges to develop expertise in this division and related land use and environmental laws, so that those judges will be available to hear, and quickly resolve, actions or proceedings brought pursuant to Sections 21167, 21168, and 21168.5.
(c)In an action or proceeding filed pursuant to this chapter that is joined with any other cause of action, the court, upon a motion by any party, may grant severance of the actions. In determining whether to grant severance, the court shall consider such matters as judicial economy,
administrative economy, and prejudice to any party.
(a)In any action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with this division, the petitioner shall request a hearing within 90 days from the date of filing the petition or shall be subject to dismissal on the court’s own motion or on the motion of any party interested in the action or proceeding.
(b)The petitioner shall serve a notice of the request for a hearing on all parties at the time that the petitioner files the request for a hearing.
(c)Upon the filing of a request by the petitioner for a hearing and upon application by any party, the court shall establish a briefing schedule and a hearing date. In the absence of
good cause, briefing shall be completed within 60 days from the date that the request for a hearing is filed, and the hearing, to the extent feasible, shall be held within 30 days thereafter. Good cause may include, but shall not be limited to, the conduct of discovery, determination of the completeness of the record of proceedings, the complexity of the issues, and the length of the record of proceedings and the timeliness of its production. The parties may stipulate to a briefing schedule or hearing date that differs from the schedule set forth in this subdivision if the stipulation is approved by the court.
(a)If a court finds, as a result of a trial, hearing, or remand from an appellate court, that any determination, finding, or decision of a public agency has been made without compliance with this division, the court shall enter an order that includes one or more of the following:
(1)A mandate that the determination, finding, or decision be voided by the public agency, in whole or in part.
(2)If the court finds that a specific project activity or activities will prejudice the consideration or implementation of particular mitigation measures or alternatives to the project, a mandate that the
public agency and any real parties in interest suspend any or all specific project activity or activities, pursuant to the determination, finding, or decision, that could result in an adverse change or alteration to the physical environment, until the public agency has taken any actions that may be necessary to bring the determination, finding, or decision into compliance with this division.
(3)A mandate that the public agency take specific action as may be necessary to bring the determination, finding, or decision into compliance with this division.
(b)Any order pursuant to subdivision (a) shall include only those mandates that are necessary to achieve compliance with this division and only those specific project activities in noncompliance with this division. The order shall
be made by the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate specifying what action by the public agency is necessary to comply with this division. However, the order shall be limited to that portion of a determination, finding, or decision or the specific project activity or activities found to be in noncompliance only if a court finds that (1) the portion or specific project activity or activities are severable, (2) severance will not prejudice complete and full compliance with this division, and (3) the court has not found the remainder of the project to be in noncompliance with this division. The trial court shall retain jurisdiction over the public agency’s proceedings by way of a return to the peremptory writ until the court has determined that the public agency has complied with this division.
(c)(1)A court may issue
an interlocutory remand order if the court finds both of the following:
(A)The order would promote judicial efficiency and expedition.
(B)The public agency’s reconsideration on remand comports with due process and is not likely to result in a post hoc rationalization of the public agency’s actions.
(2)This subdivision shall not prevent a court from entering a final judgment, affect the right of parties to appeal that judgment, or affect the appropriate determination of attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 1021.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(d)Nothing in this section authorizes a court to direct any public agency to exercise its discretion in any particular
way. Except as expressly provided in this section, nothing in this section is intended to limit the equitable powers of the court.