(5) “Segment” means the University of California, the California State University, or the California Community Colleges.
(b) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) Free speech, academic freedom, and the free exchange of views among students and faculty are all critical to the educational missions of the segments.
(2) It is also critical to the educational missions of the segments that speech and the exchange of ideas take place in a constructive environment of mutual respect for diversity of backgrounds, ideas, and viewpoints in order to do all of the
following:
(A) Maximize the exchange of views.
(B) Achieve the goals of excellence in research, teaching, and learning.
(C) Achieve the goal of developing lifelong citizenship skills.
(3) The educational missions and goals of the segments are severely disrupted by actions that constitute violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination in violation of federal or state law, segment rules, or campus
institution codes of conduct.
(4) The values of free speech, the free exchange of ideas, and the opportunities to all who wish to express their views on campus at an institution are important values and provide critical contributions to the educational missions of the segments.
(5) A constructive environment of mutual respect is just as important to furthering free speech as it is to furthering the educational missions of the segments.
(6) The values of free speech, the free exchange of ideas, and the opportunities to all who wish to express their views on campus
at an institution are impaired by actions that constitute violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination in violation of federal or state law, segment
rules, or campus institution codes of conduct.
(7) Violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination based on a person’s identity, ideas, or viewpoints violate the rights of the victims and impair both the educational missions of the segments and the values of free speech.
(8) Violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination may violate federal and state antidiscrimination laws applicable to the segments, including Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000d,
2000d et seq.) and Section 66270 of the Education Code, and frustrate the efforts of the segments to comply with these laws and ensure that the victims have the opportunity to participate fully and equally in their chosen campus institution experience.
(9) Violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination in the sheltered environment of a residential campus institution impair the educational missions of the segment, undermine the value of antidiscrimination embodied in federal
and state civil rights laws, and diminish, in the aggregate, the exercise of free speech by intimidating members of the campus institution’s community who become reluctant to express their views.
(10) In numerous instances, participants in campus institution activities have engaged done all of the following:
(A) Engaged in violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination that were intended, and were reasonably understood by the victims or hearers, to do either, or both, of the following: discrimination.
(A)Interfere with
(B) Interfered, through force, threat of force, or intimidation, with rights established under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 2 of Article I of the California Constitution, or otherwise interfere interfered with the free exchange of ideas. ideas or the educational mission of the segment.
(B)Call for or support genocide, as that term is defined by the
1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention), whether that genocide is aimed at protected groups specified in the Genocide Convention, or aimed at protected groups specified in Section 51 of the Civil Code.
(C) Called for genocide.
(11) The violence, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination activities described in paragraph (10) have impaired the educational missions of the segments, undermined federal and state antidiscrimination
laws, interfered with the exercise of rights established under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 2 of Article I of the California Constitution, and interfered with the free exchange of ideas by members of campus institution communities.