Amended
IN
Senate
April 30, 2019 |
Senate Bill | No. 600 |
Introduced by Senator Portantino |
February 22, 2019 |
This bill would also prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from denying coverage for standard fertility preservation services based on medical necessity when a provider of a treatment of a medical condition authorized by the plan or policy states that the treatment may cause iatrogenic infertility to an enrollee or insured. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill
would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(a)Standard fertility preservation services shall be deemed medically necessary when a provider of treatment of a medical condition authorized by a health care service plan states that there is a substantial likelihood that the treatment may directly or indirectly cause iatrogenic infertility to the enrollee.
(b)When a provider states that standard fertility preservation services are medically necessary pursuant to subdivision (a), a health care service plan shall not deny coverage for those services based on medical necessity.
(a)Standard fertility preservation services shall be deemed medically necessary when a provider of treatment of a medical condition authorized by a health insurance policy states that there is a substantial likelihood that the treatment may cause iatrogenic infertility to the insured.
(b)When a provider states that standard fertility preservation services are medically necessary pursuant to subdivision (a), an insurer shall not deny coverage for those services based on medical necessity.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.