MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE
2013 Regular Session
To: Marine Resources
By: Representatives Eure, Guice
AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 49-15-303, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO AUTHORIZE THE COMMISSION ON MARINE RESOURCES TO EXEMPT SUCH COMMISSION FROM PREPARING AN ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 25-43-3.105, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO CONFORM TO THE PRECEDING SECTION; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI:
SECTION 1. Section 49-15-303, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:
49-15-303. The commission shall have the following powers and duties:
(a) To formulate the policy of the department regarding marine resources within the jurisdiction of the department;
(b) To enter into and authorize the executive director to execute contracts, grants and cooperative agreements with any public or private institution, federal or state agency or any subdivision thereof to carry out the duties of the commission;
(c) To adopt, amend or repeal any rules and regulations necessary for the operation of the commission and the department necessary for the protection, conservation and propagation of seafood, and necessary for the management of commercial and recreational taking of seafood; and
(d) To discharge other duties and powers as are necessary to implement state policy regarding marine resources.
(e) To exempt the commission from the requirements of Section 25-43-3.105, unless the commission determines that the adoption, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation is a significant amendment for which the total aggregate cost to all persons required to comply with the rule or regulation exceeds One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00).
SECTION 2. Section 25-43-3.105, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:
[Through June 30, 2016, this section shall read as follows:]
25-43-3.105. (1) Prior to giving the notice required in Section 25-43-3.103, each agency, except the Commission on Marine Resources as provided in 49-15-303, proposing the adoption of a rule or amendment of an existing rule imposing a duty, responsibility or requirement on any person shall consider the economic impact the rule will have on the citizens of our state and the benefits the rule will cause to accrue to those citizens.
(2) Each agency shall prepare a written report providing an economic impact statement for the adoption of a rule or amendment to an existing rule imposing a duty, responsibility or requirement on any person. The economic impact statement shall include the following:
(a) The specific legal authority authorizing the promulgation of the rule.
(b) A description of:
(i) The need for the proposed action;
(ii) The benefits which will likely accrue as the result of the proposed action; and
(iii) The effect the proposed action will have on the public health, safety and welfare.
(c) An estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state or local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed action, including the estimated amount of paperwork, and any anticipated effect on state or local revenues;
(d) An estimate of the cost or economic benefit to all persons directly affected by the proposed action;
(e) An analysis of the impact of the proposed rule on small business;
(f) A comparison of the costs and benefits of the proposed rule to the probable costs and benefits of not adopting the proposed rule or significantly amending an existing rule;
(g) A determination of whether less costly methods or less intrusive methods exist for achieving the purpose of the proposed rule where reasonable alternative methods exist which are not precluded by law;
(h) A description of reasonable alternative methods, where applicable, for achieving the purpose of the proposed action which were considered by the agency and a statement of reasons for rejecting those alternatives in favor of the proposed rule; and
(i) A detailed statement of the data and methodology used in making estimates required by this subsection.
(3) No rule or regulation shall be declared invalid based on a challenge to the economic impact statement for the rule unless the issue is raised in the agency proceeding. No person shall have standing to challenge a rule, based upon the economic impact statement or lack thereof, unless that person provided the agency with information sufficient to make the agency aware of specific concerns regarding the statement in an oral proceeding or in written comments regarding the rule. The grounds for invalidation of an agency action, based upon the economic impact statement, are limited to the agency's failure to adhere to the procedure for preparation of the economic impact statement as provided in this section, or the agency's failure to consider information submitted to the agency regarding specific concerns about the statement, if that failure substantially impairs the fairness of the rule-making proceeding.
(4) A concise summary and the full text of the economic impact statement must be properly filed with the Secretary of State for publication in the administrative bulletin and the period during which persons may make written submissions on the proposed rule shall not expire until at least twenty (20) days after the date of such proper filing.
(5) The properly filed summary of the economic impact statement must also indicate where, when and how persons may present their views on the proposed rule and demand an oral proceeding on the proposed rule if one is not already provided.
[From and after July 1, 2016, this section shall read as follows:]
25-43-3.105. (1) Prior to giving the notice required in Section 25-43-3.103, each agency, except the Commission on Marine Resources as provided in 49-15-303, proposing the adoption of a rule or significant amendment of an existing rule imposing a duty, responsibility or requirement on any person shall consider the economic impact the rule will have on the citizens of our state and the benefits the rule will cause to accrue to those citizens. For purposes of this section, a "significant amendment" means any amendment to a rule for which the total aggregate cost to all persons required to comply with that rule exceeds One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00).
(2) Each agency shall prepare a written report providing an economic impact statement for the adoption of a rule or significant amendment to an existing rule imposing a duty, responsibility or requirement on any person, except as provided in subsection (7) of this section. The economic impact statement shall include the following:
(a) A description of the need for and the benefits which will likely accrue as the result of the proposed action;
(b) An estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state or local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed action, including the estimated amount of paperwork, and any anticipated effect on state or local revenues;
(c) An estimate of the cost or economic benefit to all persons directly affected by the proposed action;
(d) An analysis of the impact of the proposed rule on small business;
(e) A comparison of the costs and benefits of the proposed rule to the probable costs and benefits of not adopting the proposed rule or significantly amending an existing rule;
(f) A determination of whether less costly methods or less intrusive methods exist for achieving the purpose of the proposed rule where reasonable alternative methods exist which are not precluded by law;
(g) A description of reasonable alternative methods, where applicable, for achieving the purpose of the proposed action which were considered by the agency and a statement of reasons for rejecting those alternatives in favor of the proposed rule; and
(h) A detailed statement of the data and methodology used in making estimates required by this subsection.
(3) No rule or regulation shall be declared invalid based on a challenge to the economic impact statement for the rule unless the issue is raised in the agency proceeding. No person shall have standing to challenge a rule, based upon the economic impact statement or lack thereof, unless that person provided the agency with information sufficient to make the agency aware of specific concerns regarding the statement in an oral proceeding or in written comments regarding the rule. The grounds for invalidation of an agency action, based upon the economic impact statement, are limited to the agency's failure to adhere to the procedure for preparation of the economic impact statement as provided in this section, or the agency's failure to consider information submitted to the agency regarding specific concerns about the statement, if that failure substantially impairs the fairness of the rule-making proceeding.
(4) A concise summary of the economic impact statement must be properly filed with the Secretary of State for publication in the administrative bulletin and the period during which persons may make written submissions on the proposed rule shall not expire until at least twenty (20) days after the date of such proper filing.
(5) The properly filed summary of the economic impact statement must also indicate where persons may obtain copies of the full text of the economic impact statement and where, when and how persons may present their views on the proposed rule and demand an oral proceeding on the proposed rule if one is not already provided.
(6) If the agency has made a good-faith effort to comply with the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) of this section, the rule may not be invalidated on the ground that the contents of the economic impact statement are insufficient or inaccurate.
(7) This section does not apply to the adoption of:
(a) Any rule which is required by the federal government pursuant to a state/federal program delegation agreement or contract;
(b) Any rule which is expressly required by state law; and
(c) A temporary rule adopted pursuant to Section 25-43-3.108.
SECTION 3. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2013.