Bill Text: NH HB1604 | 2024 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Relative to the use of electronic medical records.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2024-05-22 - Refer to Interim Study, Motion Adopted, Voice Vote; 05/22/2024; Senate Journal 14 [HB1604 Detail]
Download: New_Hampshire-2024-HB1604-Introduced.html
HB 1604-FN - AS INTRODUCED
2024 SESSION
24-2380
05/10
HOUSE BILL 1604-FN
AN ACT relative to the use of electronic medical records.
SPONSORS: Rep. Nagel, Belk. 6
COMMITTEE: Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS
This bill prohibits health carriers from requiring that providers use electronic medical records and establishes requirements regarding patient access to such records.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
24-2380
05/10
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Four
AN ACT relative to the use of electronic medical records.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Section; Electronic Medical Records. Amend RSA 332-I by inserting after section 13 the following new section:
332-I:14 Electronic Medical Records.
I. In this section, "electronic medical record" or "EMR" means a digital version of the paper charts in medical provider’s offices, clinics, and hospitals. EMRs contain notes and information collected by and for the clinicians in that office, clinic, or hospital and are mostly used by providers for diagnosis and treatment.
II. No public or private health carrier shall:
(a) Require a health care provider to use an EMR.
(b) Withhold any portion of a provider’s fee for not using an EMR.
(c) Require any specific format of EMR.
(d) Require any specific information in the EMR other than certain demographic information required to identify the patient, the purpose of the health care interaction, and treatment rendered.
III. All health carriers and providers shall:
(a) At the patient or legal guardian’s request, allow the patient or legal guardian access to review the EMR within 24 hours.
(b) Provide a copy of the EMR at no cost to the patient.
(c) Develop a protocol to address a patient or legal guardian’s concerns about perceived inaccurate information in the EMR, including a process for making proposed corrections to the EMR.
2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
24-2380
12/12/23
HB 1604-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED
AN ACT relative to the use of electronic medical records.
FISCAL IMPACT: [ X ] State [ ] County [ ] Local [ ] None
|
| |||||
Estimated State Impact - Increase / (Decrease) | ||||||
| FY 2024 | FY 2025 | FY 2026 | FY 2027 | ||
Revenue | $0 | Indeterminable | Indeterminable | Indeterminable | ||
Revenue Fund(s) | Insurance premium tax revenue | |||||
Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Funding Source(s) | None | |||||
Appropriations | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
Funding Source(s) | None | |||||
• Does this bill provide sufficient funding to cover estimated expenditures? [X] N/A • Does this bill authorize new positions to implement this bill? [X] No |
The Department of Health and Human Services was initially contacted on 10/17/23 for a fiscal note worksheet, with follow-up contact on 11/15/23. If information is received, a revised fiscal note will be forward to the House Clerk’s Office.
METHODOLOGY:
This bill prohibits public and private health carriers from requiring health care providers to meet certain electronic medical record (EMR) standards. The Insurance Department states that carriers and providers may incur costs related to the following: (1) EMR programming to obtain compliance with the bill, (2) providing “no cost” copies, and (3) staffing resources to allow access to EMRs within the 24-hour time frame allowed by the bill. In addition, the right to challenge the accuracy of medical records may result in new legal expenses. Conversely, providers’ costs may be reduced because of less need for secure digital storage and reduced cost of EMR systems, training, and maintenance. If health providers face a net cost increase, they may raise the prices of their services to offset. Carriers, in turn, may increase premiums to cover these increased costs. Increased premiums may increase insurance premium tax revenue collected by the state. The extent of any impact is indeterminable.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Departments of Insurance and Health and Human Services