Bill Text: TX SB2554 | 2023-2024 | 88th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Authorizing the state to take an interlocutory appeal to seek the overruling of Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003).
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2023-03-23 - Referred to State Affairs [SB2554 Detail]
Download: Texas-2023-SB2554-Introduced.html
By: Middleton | S.B. No. 2554 | |
|
||
|
||
authorizing the state to take an interlocutory appeal to seek the | ||
overruling of Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003). | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. Chapter 12, Code of Criminal Procedure, is | ||
amended by adding Article 12.08 to read as follows: | ||
Art. 12.08. APPEAL TO OVERRULE STOGNER. (a) The state may | ||
bring criminal charges against a defendant that would otherwise be | ||
barred by the interpretation of the Ex Post Facto Clause adopted by | ||
the Supreme Court of the United States in Stogner v. California, 539 | ||
U.S. 607 (2003). | ||
(b) The state may take an immediate appeal directly to the | ||
Court of Criminal Appeals from an order dismissing any criminal | ||
prosecution as barred by the interpretation of the Ex Post Facto | ||
Clause adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Stogner | ||
v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003), and may appeal solely for the | ||
purpose of seeking reconsideration of Stogner by the Supreme Court | ||
of the United States on petition for certiorari. | ||
(c) The Court of Criminal Appeals shall expedite the | ||
consideration of any appeal taken under Subsection (b) and resolve | ||
the appeal as quickly as possible. | ||
(d) The Court of Criminal Appeals may summarily affirm, | ||
without requesting merits briefing or holding oral argument, if it | ||
concludes or the state concedes that Stogner compels the dismissal | ||
of the criminal prosecution, and there is no reasonable grounds for | ||
distinguishing that ruling factually or legally. The state may | ||
indicate in its notice of appeal that Stogner compels the dismissal | ||
of the criminal prosecution, and there is no reasonable grounds for | ||
distinguishing that ruling factually or legally, and that the | ||
appeal is taken solely for the purpose of seeking reconsideration | ||
of Stogner on petition for certiorari. | ||
(e) The state may petition for writ of certiorari from any | ||
decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the dismissal | ||
of the criminal prosecution under Stogner. | ||
SECTION 2. If any provision of this Act or its application | ||
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does | ||
not affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be | ||
given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to | ||
this end the provisions of this Act are declared to be severable. | ||
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2023. |