Bill Text: CA AB251 | 2017-2018 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Bar pilots: pilotage rates.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2018-08-09 - Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c). [AB251 Detail]
Download: California-2017-AB251-Amended.html
Amended
IN
Senate
August 06, 2018 |
Amended
IN
Senate
June 29, 2017 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 30, 2017 |
Assembly Bill | No. 251 |
Introduced by Assembly Member Bonta |
January 30, 2017 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
Existing law establishes the State Department of Public Health and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, the licensure and regulation of chronic dialysis clinics. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations to implement these provisions, and requires those regulations to prescribe, among other things, minimum standards for providing the services offered. Violation of these provisions is a crime.
This bill would, for each fiscal year starting on or after January 1, 2019, require a chronic dialysis clinic to submit a report to the department detailing the total treatment revenue of the clinic, and the percentages of
that total treatment revenue the clinic has expended on direct patient care services costs, health care quality improvements costs, federal and state taxes, facility license fees, and all other costs. The bill would, for each fiscal year starting on or after January 1, 2019, require a chronic dialysis clinic, if its direct patient care services costs, health care quality improvements costs, federal and state taxes, and facility license fees total less than 85% of the treatment revenue, to issue a rebate and reduction in billed amount to payers on a pro rata basis, as specified.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would
provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program:Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 1154 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1154.
(a) The board is vested with all functions and duties relating to the administration of this division, except those functions and duties vested in the Secretary ofSEC. 2.
Section 1156 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1156.
(a) The board may appoint, fix the compensation of, andSEC. 3.
Section 1156.5 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1156.5.
(a) The executive director shall serve at the pleasure of the board and shall be under the direct supervision of the board. The term of office to which the executive director is appointed is five years.SEC. 4.
Section 1157.5 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1157.5.
SEC. 5.
Section 1170.1 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1170.1.
In determining the number of pilots needed, pursuant to Section 1170, the board shall take into consideration the findings and declarations in SectionsSEC. 6.
Section 1190 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1190.
(a) Every vessel spoken inward or outward bound shall pay the following rate of bar pilotage through the Golden Gate and into or out of the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun:(A)(i)On and after January 1, 2010, if the number of pilots licensed by the board is 58 or 59 pilots, the mill rate in effect on December 31, 2006, shall be decreased by an incremental amount that is proportionate to one-half of the last audited annual average net income per pilot for each pilot licensed by the board below 60 pilots.
(ii)On and after January 1, 2010, if the
number of pilots licensed by the board is fewer than 58 pilots, the mill rate in effect on December 31, 2006, shall be adjusted in accordance with the method described in clause (i) as though there are 58 pilots licensed by the board.
(iii)The incremental mill rate adjustment authorized by this subparagraph shall be calculated using the data reported to the board for the number of gross registered tons handled by pilots licensed under this division during the same 12-month period as the audited annual average net income per pilot. The incremental mill rate adjustment shall become effective at the beginning of the immediately following quarter, commencing January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1, as directed by the board.
(iv)On and after January 1, 2010, if, during any quarter described in this paragraph, the number of pilots licensed by the board is equal to or greater than 60, clauses (i) to (iii), inclusive, shall become inoperative on the first
day of the immediately following quarter.
(B)There shall be an incremental rate of additional mills per high gross registered ton as is necessary and authorized by the board to recover the pilots’ costs of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications for the purposes of extending the service life of existing pilot boats, excluding costs for repair or maintenance. The incremental mill rate charge authorized by this subparagraph shall be identified as a pilot boat surcharge on the pilots’ invoices and separately accounted for in the accounting required by Section 1136. Net proceeds from the sale of existing pilot boats shall be used to reduce the debt on the new pilot boats and any debt associated with the modification of pilot boats under this subparagraph. The board may adjust a pilot boat surcharge to reflect any associated operational savings resulting from the modification of pilot boats under this subparagraph, including, but not limited to,
reduced repair and maintenance expenses.
(C)In addition to the incremental rate specified in subparagraph (B), the
(d)The board shall determine the number of pilots to be licensed based on the 1986 manpower study adopted by the board.
(e)Consistent with the board’s May 2002 adoption of rate
recommendations, the rates imposed pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) that are in effect on December 31, 2002, shall be increased by 4 percent on January 1, 2003; those in effect on December 31, 2003, shall be increased by 4 percent on January 1, 2004; those in effect on December 31, 2004, shall be increased by 3 percent on January 1, 2005; and those in effect on December 31, 2005, shall be increased by 3 percent on January 1, 2006.
SEC. 7.
Section 1190.1 of the Harbors and Navigation Code is amended to read:1190.1.
Every vessel that uses a pilot under this division while navigating the waters of Monterey Bay shall pay the rateSEC. 8.
Section 1190.2 is added to the Harbors and Navigation Code, to read:1190.2.
There shall be an incremental rate of additional mills per high gross registered ton as is necessary and authorized by the board to recover the pilots’ cost of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications for the purposes of extending the service life of existing pilot boats, excluding costs for repair or maintenance. The incremental mill rate charge authorized by this section shall be identified as a pilot boat surcharge on the pilots’ invoices and separately accounted for in the accounting required by Section 1136. Net proceeds from the sale of an existing pilot boat shall be used to reduce the debt on the new pilot boats and any debt associated with the modification of pilot boats under this section. The board may adjust a pilot boat surcharge to reflect any associated operational savings resulting from the modification of pilot boats under this section, including, but not limited to, reduced repair and maintenance expenses.The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)Dialysis is a critical, lifesaving treatment for Californians suffering from end-stage renal disease.
(b)There are currently more than 66,000 dialysis patients and more than 570 licensed chronic dialysis
clinics in California.
(c)Dialysis clinics in California frequently charge private health insurance plans four or more times as much, and sometimes 15 to 20 times as much, as they charge Medicare for the very same dialysis treatment, but do not spend sufficient funds on ensuring quality patient care.
(d)The disparity in amounts that dialysis clinics charge to Medicare and private health insurance plans does not enhance health outcomes, but it produces substantial profits for dialysis clinics while raising the cost of private health insurance for patients and all Californians.
(e)In recent years, considerable consolidation of the private dialysis clinic industry has prevented the marketplace from effectively ensuring that the clinics spend sufficient funds on quality patient care.
(f)Two multinational, for-profit companies operate or manage nearly three quarters of the dialysis clinics in California and treat more than 70 percent of dialysis patients nationwide. These companies can largely dictate the quality of patient care provided to the dialysis patients, as well as the pricing of such treatments.
(g)Regulation of the dialysis clinic industry is necessary to protect all
Californians, including those suffering from end-stage renal disease, and to ensure that the focus of these clinics is on providing quality patient care.
(a)For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1)“Administrator” means the administrator as that term is used in Section 494.180(a) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations as it read on December 31, 2016.
(2)“Chief Executive Officer” means the chief executive officer as that term is used in Section 494.180(a) of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations as it read on December 31, 2016.
(3)“Direct patient care services costs” means costs claimed by a chronic dialysis clinic under lines one to 10, inclusive, 12, and 14 to 21, inclusive, of the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services Worksheet A of Form CMS-265-11, as it read on December 31, 2016, and similar costs as the department may identify through regulation.
(4)“Health care quality improvement costs” means costs required to maintain, access, or exchange electronic health information, support health information technologies, train nonmanagerial personnel engaged in direct patient care, and provide patient-centered education and counseling.
(A)Upon request by a chronic dialysis clinic, the department may deem other expenditures to have been made for health care quality improvements if all of the following apply:
(i)The chronic dialysis clinic shows that its expenditure was for activities or items designed to improve health quality and increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes in ways that are capable of being
objectively measured and of producing verifiable results and achievements.
(ii)The chronic dialysis clinic actually paid the cost.
(iii)The cost was spent on services offered at the chronic dialysis clinic to chronic dialysis patients.
(B)The department may permit the chronic dialysis clinic to apply a health care quality improvement cost incurred in one year proportionally over a period not to exceed five years upon a finding that the chronic dialysis clinic has demonstrated that the cost is reasonably expected to provide health care quality improvements for that period.
(5)“Payer” means the person or persons who paid or are financially responsible for payments for a treatment provided to a particular patient, and may include the patient or other
individuals, primary insurers, secondary insurers, and other entities, including Medicare and any other federal, state, county, city, or other local government payer.
(6)“Treatment” means each instance when the chronic dialysis clinic provides services to a patient for which costs are reported to the department under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b).
(7)“Treatment revenue” means the total amount the chronic dialysis clinic collects from payers for treatments.
(b)(1)For each fiscal year starting on or after January 1, 2019, a chronic dialysis clinic shall submit to the department a report concerning the total treatment revenue of the chronic dialysis clinic for the fiscal year and the amounts and percentages of that total treatment revenue the chronic dialysis has expended
on all of the following:
(A)Direct patient care services costs.
(B)Health care quality improvements costs.
(C)Federal and state taxes, and facility license fees paid pursuant to Section 1266.
(D)All other costs.
(2)The chronic dialysis clinic shall annually submit the report required by this subdivision to the department on a schedule, in a format, and on a form prescribed by the department, provided that the chronic dialysis clinic shall submit the information no later than 150 days after the end of its fiscal year. The chief executive officer or administrator of the chronic dialysis clinic shall personally certify that he or she is satisfied, after review, that the report submitted
to the department under paragraph (1) is accurate and complete.
(c)(1)For each fiscal year starting on or after January 1, 2019, a chronic dialysis clinic shall calculate the costs described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) and the total treatment revenue. If the costs described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) total less than 85 percent of treatment revenue, the chronic dialysis clinic shall issue a rebate and a reduction in billed amount to payers, other than Medicare or any other federal, state, county, city, or other local government payer, on a pro rata basis, in an amount that is sufficient to result in a ratio of at least 85 percent of costs described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) to total treatment revenue less rebates and reductions in billed amounts to payers issued in the same fiscal year, as
follows:
(A)The chronic dialysis clinic shall issue the rebate or reduction in billed amount together with interest thereon of 10 percent per annum, which shall accrue from the last day of the fiscal year to which the rebate or reduction relates.
(B)Where a rebate must be paid or an amount billed but not yet paid must be reduced pursuant to this section, and more than one payer is responsible, the clinic shall divide and distribute the total required rebate or reduction in billed amounts among the payers consistent with the payers’ relative obligations to pay for the treatment.
(C)The chronic dialysis clinic shall issue the rebate or reduction in billed amount no later than 210 days after the end of the fiscal year to which the rebate or reduction relates.
(2)For each fiscal year starting on or after January 1, 2019, a chronic dialysis clinic shall maintain and provide to the department, on a form and schedule prescribed by the department, a report of all rebates and reductions it issued under paragraph (1), including a description of each instance during the period covered by the submission when the rebate or reduction required under paragraph (1) was not timely issued in full, and the reasons and circumstances therefore. The chief executive officer or administrator of the chronic dialysis clinic shall personally certify that he or she is satisfied, after review, that all information submitted to the department under this paragraph is accurate and complete.
(d)It is the intent of the Legislature that California taxpayers not be financially responsible for implementation and enforcement of this section. In order to effectuate that intent, when calculating, assessing, and collecting
fees imposed on chronic dialysis clinics pursuant to Section 1266, the department shall take into account all costs associated with implementing and enforcing this section.
Nothing in this act is intended to affect health facilities licensed pursuant to subdivision (a), (b), or (f) of Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code.
The State Department of Public Health shall issue regulations necessary to implement this act no later than 180 days following its effective date.
The provisions of this legislation are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.