Bill Text: CA AB928 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Child sexual exploitation: administrative subpoenas.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2020-02-03 - From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56. [AB928 Detail]
Download: California-2019-AB928-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 26, 2019 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2019–2020 REGULAR SESSION
| Assembly Bill | No. 928 |
| Introduced by Assembly Member Grayson |
February 20, 2019 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 928, as amended, Grayson.
Crimes against children: subpoenas. Child sexual exploitation: administrative subpoenas.
Existing law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, generally prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information, as defined, without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, subpoena, or order for a pen register or trap and trace device, except for emergency situations, as defined. The Act does not limit the authority of a government entity to use an administrative subpoena to require a service provider to provide subscriber information, as defined.
This bill would, notwithstanding the Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
allow a peace officer investigating the sexual exploitation of children to issue an administrative subpoena to require the production of specified information relating to an internet service account, including any internet protocol address or username associated with the account, from a service provider.
Under existing law, a person who possesses, prepares, publishes, produces, develops, duplicates, or prints any data or image with the intent to distribute, exhibit, or exchange the data or image with others for commercial consideration any obscene matter knowing that the matter depicts a minor personally engaging in or personally simulating sexual conduct is punishable as a felony by, among other things, imprisonment in state prison for 2, 3, or 6 years.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to implement an administrative subpoena process for collecting evidence of internet crimes against children.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee:Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 1546.1 of the Penal Code is amended to read:1546.1.
(a) Except as provided in this section, a government entity shall not do any of the following:(1) Compel the production of or access to electronic communication information from a service provider.
(2) Compel the production of or access to electronic device information from any person or entity other than the authorized possessor of the device.
(3) Access electronic device information by means of physical interaction or electronic communication with the electronic device. This section does not prohibit the intended recipient of an electronic communication from voluntarily disclosing electronic communication information concerning
that communication to a government entity.
(b) A government entity may compel the production of or access to electronic communication information from a service provider, or compel the production of or access to electronic device information from any person or entity other than the authorized possessor of the device only under the following circumstances:
(1) Pursuant to a warrant issued pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 1523) and subject to subdivision (d).
(2) Pursuant to a wiretap order issued pursuant to Chapter 1.4 (commencing with Section 629.50) of Title 15 of Part 1.
(3) Pursuant to an order for electronic reader records issued pursuant to Section 1798.90 of the Civil Code.
(4) Pursuant to a subpoena issued pursuant to existing state law, provided that the information is not sought for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting a criminal offense, and compelling the production of or access to the information via the subpoena is not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to expand any authority under state law to compel the production of or access to electronic information.
(5) Pursuant to an order for a pen register or trap and trace device, or both, issued pursuant to Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 630) of Title 15 of Part 1.
(c) A government entity may access electronic device information by means of physical interaction or electronic communication with the device only as follows:
(1) Pursuant to a warrant issued
pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 1523) and subject to subdivision (d).
(2) Pursuant to a wiretap order issued pursuant to Chapter 1.4 (commencing with Section 629.50) of Title 15 of Part 1.
(3) Pursuant to a tracking device search warrant issued pursuant to paragraph (12) of subdivision (a) of Section 1524 and subdivision (b) of Section 1534.
(4) With the specific consent of the authorized possessor of the device.
(5) With the specific consent of the owner of the device, only when the device has been reported as lost or stolen.
(6) If the government entity, in good faith, believes that an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires
access to the electronic device information.
(7) If the government entity, in good faith, believes the device to be lost, stolen, or abandoned, provided that the government entity shall only access electronic device information in order to attempt to identify, verify, or contact the owner or authorized possessor of the device.
(8) Except where prohibited by state or federal law, if the device is seized from an inmate’s possession or found in an area of a correctional facility or a secure area of a local detention facility where inmates have access, the device is not in the possession of an individual, and the device is not known or believed to be the possession of an authorized visitor. This paragraph shall not be construed to supersede or override Section 4576.
(9) Except where prohibited by state or federal law, if
the device is seized from an authorized possessor of the device who is serving a term of parole under the supervision of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or a term of postrelease community supervision under the supervision of county probation.
(10) Except where prohibited by state or federal law, if the device is seized from an authorized possessor of the device who is subject to an electronic device search as a clear and unambiguous condition of probation, mandatory supervision, or pretrial release.
(11) If the government entity accesses information concerning the location or the telephone number of the electronic device in order to respond to an emergency 911 call from that device.
(12) Pursuant to an order for a pen register or trap and trace device, or both, issued pursuant to Chapter 1.5
(commencing with Section 630) of Title 15 of Part 1.
(d) Any warrant for electronic information shall comply with the following:
(1) The warrant shall describe with particularity the information to be seized by specifying, as appropriate and reasonable, the time periods covered, the target individuals or accounts, the applications or services covered, and the types of information sought, provided, however, that in the case of a warrant described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c), the court may determine that it is not appropriate to specify time periods because of the specific circumstances of the investigation, including, but not limited to, the nature of the device to be searched.
(2) The warrant shall require that any information obtained through the execution of the warrant that is unrelated to the objective of
the warrant shall be sealed and shall not be subject to further review, use, or disclosure except pursuant to a court order or to comply with discovery as required by Sections 1054.1 and 1054.7. A court shall issue such an order upon a finding that there is probable cause to believe that the information is relevant to an active investigation, or review, use, or disclosure is required by state or federal law.
(3) The warrant shall comply with all other provisions of California and federal law, including any provisions prohibiting, limiting, or imposing additional requirements on the use of search warrants. If directed to a service provider, the warrant shall be accompanied by an order requiring the service provider to verify the authenticity of electronic information that it produces by providing an affidavit that complies with the requirements set forth in Section 1561 of the Evidence Code. Admission of that information into evidence shall be
subject to Section 1562 of the Evidence Code.
(e) When issuing any warrant or order for electronic information, or upon the petition from the target or recipient of the warrant or order, a court may, at its discretion, do either or both of the following:
(1) Appoint a special master, as described in subdivision (d) of Section 1524, charged with ensuring that only information necessary to achieve the objective of the warrant or order is produced or accessed.
(2) Require that any information obtained through the execution of the warrant or order that is unrelated to the objective of the warrant be destroyed as soon as feasible after the termination of the current investigation and any related investigations or proceedings.
(f) A service provider may
voluntarily disclose electronic communication information or subscriber information when that disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law.
(g) If a government entity receives electronic communication information voluntarily provided pursuant to subdivision (f), it shall destroy that information within 90 days unless one or more of the following circumstances apply:
(1) The government entity has or obtains the specific consent of the sender or recipient of the electronic communications about which information was disclosed.
(2) The government entity obtains a court order authorizing the retention of the information. A court shall issue a retention order upon a finding that the conditions justifying the initial voluntary disclosure persist, in which case the court shall authorize the retention of the
information only for so long as those conditions persist, or there is probable cause to believe that the information constitutes evidence that a crime has been committed.
(3) The government entity reasonably believes that the information relates to child pornography and the information is retained as part of a multiagency database used in the investigation of child pornography and related crimes.
(4) The service provider or subscriber is, or discloses the information to, a federal, state, or local prison, jail, or juvenile detention facility, and all participants to the electronic communication were informed, prior to the communication, that the service provider may disclose the information to the government entity.
(h) If a government entity obtains electronic information pursuant to an emergency involving danger of
death or serious physical injury to a person, that requires access to the electronic information without delay, the government entity shall, within three court days after obtaining the electronic information, file with the appropriate court an application for a warrant or order authorizing obtaining the electronic information or a motion seeking approval of the emergency disclosures that shall set forth the facts giving rise to the emergency, and if applicable, a request supported by a sworn affidavit for an order delaying notification under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 1546.2. The court shall promptly rule on the application or motion and shall order the immediate destruction of all information obtained, and immediate notification pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 1546.2 if that notice has not already been given, upon a finding that the facts did not give rise to an emergency or upon rejecting the warrant or order application on any other ground. This subdivision does not apply if the
government entity obtains information concerning the location or the telephone number of the electronic device in order to respond to an emergency 911 call from that device.
(i) This section does not limit the authority of a government entity to use an administrative, grand jury, trial, or civil discovery subpoena to do any of the following:
(1) Require an originator, addressee, or intended recipient of an electronic communication to disclose any electronic communication information associated with that communication.
(2) Require an entity that provides electronic communications services to its officers, directors, employees, or agents for the purpose of carrying out their duties, to disclose electronic communication information associated with an electronic communication to or from an officer, director, employee, or
agent of the entity.
(3) Require a service provider to provide subscriber information.
(4) Require the production of the information specified in subdivision (b) of Section 1565.
(j) This section does not limit the authority of the Public Utilities Commission or the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to obtain energy or water supply and consumption information pursuant to the powers granted to them under the Public Utilities Code or the Public Resources Code and other applicable state laws.
(k) This chapter shall not be construed to alter the authority of a government entity that owns an electronic device to compel an
employee who is authorized to possess the device to return the device to the government entity’s possession.
SEC. 2.
Section 1565 is added to the Penal Code, to read:1565.
(a) Notwithstanding the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (Chapter 3.6 (commencing with Section 1546)), a peace officer investigating the sexual exploitation of children may, upon reasonable cause to believe that an internet service account has been used in the exploitation or attempted exploitation of a child, issue in writing and cause to be served an administrative subpoena requiring the production of the following information relating to that internet service account:(1) The name of the account holder.
(2) The billing and service address of the account holder.
(3) Any telephone number, email address, or
similar contact information provided by the subscriber to the service provider to establish or maintain an account.
(4) Any internet user name associated with the account.
(5) Any internet protocol address associated with the account.
(6) The method of access to the internet.
(7) The automatic number identification records if access is by modem.
(8) The source of payment for the service, including a credit card or bank account number.
(b) Except as required by subdivision (a), an internet service provider shall not disclose any other electronic communication information, as defined by subdivision (d) of Section 1546, unless
the request complies with Chapter 3.6 (commencing with Section 1546), or any of the following information:
(1) Any in-transit electronic communication.
(2) Account memberships related to internet groups, newsgroups, mailing lists, or information related to specific areas of interest.
(3) Account passwords.
(4) Account content including, but not limited to, electronic mail in any form, address books or contact lists, financial records, or internet proxy content history.
(5) Files or other digital documents stored within the account or pursuant to use of the account.
(c) At any time before the return date specified in the
administrative subpoena, the service provider may petition for an order modifying or setting aside the subpoena, or prohibiting the disclosure of the information specified in subdivision (a), in the superior court for the county in which the service provider summoned resides or does business.
(d) An administrative subpoena issued pursuant to this section shall describe the information required to be produced and shall prescribe a return date within a reasonable period of time in which the information can be assembled and made available.
(e) If a case or proceeding does not arise from the production of information pursuant to this section within a reasonable time after that information is produced, the records shall either be destroyed or returned to the service provider.
(f) An administrative subpoena issued pursuant
to this section may be served by personal delivery upon any officer, director, custodian of records, or agent or employee authorized by the service provider to accept service of a subpoena. If the service provider is a natural person, service may be made upon that person.
(g) As used in this section, “service provider” has the same meaning as specified in Section 1546.
It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to implement an administrative subpoena process for collecting evidence of internet crimes against children.
