Bill Text: CA SB21 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Controlled substances.
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 11-7)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2024-05-02 - From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. [SB21 Detail]
Download: California-2023-SB21-Amended.html
Amended
IN
Assembly
May 02, 2024 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
January 17, 2024 |
Amended
IN
Senate
February 23, 2023 |
Introduced by Senator Umberg (Principal coauthor: Senator Ochoa Bogh) (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Pacheco) (Coauthors: Senators Alvarado-Gil, Archuleta, Ashby, Dahle, Dodd, Glazer, Jones, Niello, Rubio, Seyarto, and Wilk) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Chen, Stephanie Nguyen, Petrie-Norris, and Blanca Rubio) |
December 05, 2022 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
The California Constitution provides for the Right to Truth-in-Evidence, which requires a ⅔ vote
of the Legislature to exclude any relevant evidence from any criminal proceeding, as specified.
This bill would make specified statements and information from the evaluation and treatment process from being used as evidence in any subsequent proceedings or actions, thereby requiring a
Digest Key
Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 11369 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:11369.
(a) This section shall be known, and may be cited, as Alexandra’s Law.(g)(1)In lieu of a jail or prison sentence, or a grant of probation, a defendant charged with
a violation described in subdivision (b) who meets all of the following conditions, may elect to undergo treatment by pleading guilty or no contest to a violation described in subdivision (b) and admitting the alleged prior convictions, waiving time for sentencing and the pronouncement of judgment, and agreeing to participate in, and complete, a detailed treatment program developed by a drug addiction expert and approved by the court.
(A)Within five years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense, the defendant has not suffered a conviction for any offense involving controlled substances other than the offenses listed in subdivision (a) of Section 1000 of the Penal Code.
(B)The offense charged did not involve a crime of violence or threatened violence.
(C)There is no evidence of a contemporaneous violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation of the offenses listed in subdivision (a) of Section 1000 of the Penal Code.
(D)The defendant has no prior felony conviction within five years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense.
(2)A defendant’s plea of guilty or no contest shall not constitute a conviction for any purpose unless judgment is entered pursuant to paragraph (8) or subdivision (f).
(3)Upon or subsequent to arraignment for a violation described in subdivision (b), and at the request or with the consent of the defendant or their attorney, the court shall order a drug addiction expert to conduct a substance abuse and mental health evaluation of the defendant. The evaluation shall include an inquiry into any mental health diagnoses and symptoms, but shall not include a diagnosis or treatment recommendation, unless the evaluator is otherwise qualified to make those findings. The expert shall submit a report of the evaluation to the court and parties. The evaluation may be based on an interview of the defendant or other individuals with relevant knowledge and review of records the expert deems appropriate, such as medical records, criminal history, prior treatment history, and records pertaining to the current offense. The evaluation shall detail the defendant’s drug abuse or mental health issues, if any, so the court and parties may better determine appropriate handling of the defendant’s case.
(A)The statement, or any information procured therefrom, made by the defendant to a drug addiction expert or drug treatment worker during the course of any investigation conducted by the drug addiction expert or treatment program pursuant to this paragraph, and prior to the reporting of the drug addiction expert’s findings and recommendations to the court, shall be inadmissible in any action or proceeding brought subsequent to the investigation.
(B)The statement, or any information procured therefrom, with respect to the specific offense with which the defendant is charged, that is made to any drug addiction expert or drug program worker subsequent to the granting of treatment described in paragraph (1) shall be inadmissible in any action or proceeding.
(4)Concurrent with the order for a substance abuse and mental health evaluation of the defendant, and with the defendant’s consent, the court shall also order that a qualified individual determine whether the defendant is eligible to receive Medi-Cal, Medicare, or any other relevant benefits for any programs or public social services. If the defendant did not previously consent to an eligibility determination at arraignment, the court shall order the eligibility determination upon and as a condition of the defendant’s agreement to participate in and complete a treatment program as described in this subdivision.
(5)A treatment program, for the purposes of this subdivision, may include, but is not limited to, drug treatment, mental health treatment, job training, and any other conditions related to treatment or a successful outcome for the defendant that the court finds appropriate. The court shall hold regular hearings to review the progress of the defendant. The court shall make referrals to programs that provide services at no cost to the participant and have been deemed by the court, the drug addiction expert, and the parties to be credible and effective. A defendant may also choose to pay for a program that is approved by the court.
(6)If available and applicable, the court may refer a defendant to programs and services that use contingency management services with incentive structures, including, but not limited to, scaling rewards for continued evidence of specified behaviors or adherence to treatment goals, or rewards to participants for specified behaviors, such as negative urinalysis.
(7)Upon the defendant’s successful completion of the treatment program as specified in paragraph (1), the positive recommendation of the treatment program, and the motion of the defendant, prosecuting attorney, the court, or the probation department, the court shall dismiss this charge against the defendant and the provisions of Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code, as it read on the effective date of the act that added this section, shall apply, including the provision that the arrest upon which the defendant was deferred shall be deemed to have never occurred. A dismissal based on the successful completion of treatment shall not count as a conviction for any purpose.
(8)(A)If at any time it appears that the defendant is performing unsatisfactorily in the program, is not benefiting from treatment, is not amenable to treatment, has refused treatment, or has been convicted of a crime that was committed since starting treatment, the prosecuting attorney, the court on its own, or the probation department shall make a motion for entry of judgment and sentencing. After notice to the defendant, the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether judgment should be entered and the defendant sentenced. Judgment shall be imposed and the defendant sentenced if the court finds true one or more for the foregoing circumstances.
(B)Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) and except when the defendant has been found to have been convicted of a crime that was committed since starting treatment, the court may rerefer the defendant to treatment if the court finds that it is in the interest of justice to do so, that the defendant is currently amenable to treatment, and if the defendant agrees to participate in, and complete, a treatment program as described in this section.
(9)For time spent in residential treatment, a defendant may earn only actual credits pursuant to Section 2900.5 of the Penal Code and shall not earn conduct credits pursuant to Section 4019 of the Penal Code or any other provision. Time spent in any other type of program or counseling is not eligible for any credits.