Bill Amendment: FL S0328 | 2024 | Regular Session
NOTE: For additional amemendments please see the Bill Drafting List
Bill Title: Affordable Housing
Status: 2024-05-17 - Chapter No. 2024-188, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 7073 (Ch. 2024-158) [S0328 Detail]
Download: Florida-2024-S0328-Senate_Committee_Amendment_371658_to_Amendment_477146_.html
Bill Title: Affordable Housing
Status: 2024-05-17 - Chapter No. 2024-188, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 7073 (Ch. 2024-158) [S0328 Detail]
Download: Florida-2024-S0328-Senate_Committee_Amendment_371658_to_Amendment_477146_.html
Florida Senate - 2024 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. SB 328 Ì371658JÎ371658 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House . . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Community Affairs (Osgood) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment to Amendment (477146) (with title 2 amendment) 3 4 Delete lines 6 - 183 5 and insert: 6 Section 1. Subsection (7) of section 125.01055, Florida 7 Statutes, is amended, and subsection (8) is added to that 8 section, to read: 9 125.01055 Affordable housing.— 10 (7)(a) A county must authorize multifamily and mixed-use 11 residential as allowable uses in any area zoned for commercial,12industrial,or mixed use if at least 40 percent of the 13 residential units in a proposed multifamilyrentaldevelopment 14 are rental units that, for a period of at least 30 years, are 15 affordable as defined in s. 420.0004. Notwithstanding any other 16 law, local ordinance, or regulation to the contrary, a county 17 may not require a proposed multifamily development to obtain a 18 zoning or land use change, special exception, conditional use 19 approval, variance, or comprehensive plan amendment for the 20 building height, zoning, and densities authorized under this 21 subsection. For mixed-use residential projects, at least 65 22 percent of the total square footage must be used for residential 23 purposes. 24 (b) A county may not restrict the density or floor area 25 ratio of a proposed development authorized under this subsection 26 below the highest currently allowed density or floor area ratio 27 on any unincorporated land in the county where residential 28 development is allowed under the county’s land development 29 regulations. The currently allowed density or floor area ratio 30 does not include the density or floor area ratio of any 31 development that meets the requirements of this subsection or 32 any bonus, variance, or other special exception for density or 33 floor area ratio provided in the county’s land development 34 regulations as an incentive for development. 35 (c) A county may not restrict the height of a proposed 36 development authorized under this subsection below the highest 37 currently allowed height for a commercial or residential 38 buildingdevelopmentlocated in its jurisdiction within one 39 quarter1mile of the proposed development or 3 stories, 40 whichever is higher. If the height of each building on property 41 adjacent to the proposed development is 3 stories or less, the 42 county may restrict the height of the proposed development to 43 135 percent of the tallest building on property adjacent to the 44 proposed development or 3 stories, whichever is higher. The 45 currently allowed height does not include the height of any 46 development that meets the requirements of this subsection or 47 any bonus, variance, or other special exception for height 48 provided in the county’s land development regulations as an 49 incentive for development. 50 (d) A proposed development authorized under this subsection 51 must be administratively approved and no further action by the 52 board of county commissioners is required if the development 53 satisfies the county’s land development regulations for 54 multifamily developments in areas zoned for such use and is 55 otherwise consistent with the comprehensive plan, with the 56 exception of provisions establishing allowable densities, 57 height, and land use. Such land development regulations include, 58 but are not limited to, regulations relating to setbacks and 59 parking requirements. A proposed development located within one 60 quarter mile of a military installation identified in s. 61 163.3175(2) may not be administratively approved. Each county 62 shall maintain on its website a policy containing procedures and 63 expectations for administrative approval pursuant to this 64 subsection. 65 (e)1. A county must consider reducing parking requirements 66 for a proposed development authorized under this subsection if 67 the development is located within one-quarterone-halfmile of a 68majortransit stop, as defined in the county’s land development 69 code, and themajortransit stop is accessible from the 70 development. 71 2. A county must reduce parking requirements for a proposed 72 development authorized under this subsection if the development 73 is located within one-half mile of a major transportation hub 74 that is accessible from the development by safe, pedestrian 75 friendly means, such as sidewalks, crosswalks, elevated 76 pedestrian or bike paths, or other multimodal design features. 77 3. A county must eliminate parking requirements for a 78 proposed mixed-use residential development authorized under this 79 subsection within an area recognized by the county as a transit 80 oriented development or area, as provided in paragraph (g). 81 4. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “major 82 transportation hub” means any transit station, whether bus, 83 train, or light rail, which is served by public transit with a 84 mix of other transportation options. 85 (f) For proposed multifamily developments in an 86 unincorporated area zoned for commercialor industrialuse which 87 is within the boundaries of a multicounty independent special 88 district that was created to provide municipal services and is 89 not authorized to levy ad valorem taxes, and less than 20 90 percent of the land area within such district is designated for 91 commercialor industrialuse, a county must authorize, as 92 provided in this subsection, such development only if the 93 development is mixed-use residential. 94 (g) A development authorized under this section which is 95 located within a transit-oriented development or area, as 96 recognized by the county, must be mixed-use residential and 97 otherwise comply with requirements of the county’s regulations 98 applicable to the transit-oriented development or area except 99 for use, height, density, and floor area ratio as provided in 100 this section or as otherwise agreed to by the county and the 101 applicant for the development. 102 (h) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a 103 development authorized under this subsection must comply with 104 all applicable state and local laws and regulations. 105 (i)(h)This subsection does not apply to airport-impacted 106 areas as provided in s. 333.03property defined as recreational107and commercial working waterfront in s. 342.201(2)(b) in any108area zoned as industrial. 109 (j)(i)This subsection expires October 1, 2033. 110 (8) Any development authorized under paragraph (7)(a) must 111 be treated as a conforming use even after the expiration of 112 subsection (7) and the development’s affordability period as 113 provided in paragraph (7)(a), notwithstanding the county’s 114 comprehensive plan, future land use designation, or zoning. If 115 at any point during the development’s affordability period the 116 development violates the affordability period requirement 117 provided in paragraph (7)(a), the development must be allowed a 118 reasonable time to cure such violation. If the violation is not 119 cured within a reasonable time, the development must be treated 120 as a nonconforming use. 121 Section 2. Subsection (7) of section 166.04151, Florida 122 Statutes, is amended, and subsection (8) is added to that 123 section, to read: 124 166.04151 Affordable housing.— 125 (7)(a) A municipality must authorize multifamily and mixed 126 use residential as allowable uses in any area zoned for 127 commercial, industrial,or mixed use if at least 40 percent of 128 the residential units in a proposed multifamilyrental129 development are rental units that, for a period of at least 30 130 years, are affordable as defined in s. 420.0004. Notwithstanding 131 any other law, local ordinance, or regulation to the contrary, a 132 municipality may not require a proposed multifamily development 133 to obtain a zoning or land use change, special exception, 134 conditional use approval, variance, or comprehensive plan 135 amendment for the building height, zoning, and densities 136 authorized under this subsection. For mixed-use residential 137 projects, at least 65 percent of the total square footage must 138 be used for residential purposes. 139 (b) A municipality may not restrict the density or floor 140 area ratio of a proposed development authorized under this 141 subsection below the highest currently allowed density or floor 142 area ratio on any land in the municipality where residential 143 development is allowed under the municipality’s land development 144 regulations. The currently allowed density or floor area ratio 145 does not include the density or floor area ratio of any 146 development that meets the requirements of this subsection or 147 any bonus, variance, or other special exception for density or 148 floor area ratio provided in the municipality’s land development 149 regulations as an incentive for development. 150 (c) A municipality may not restrict the height of a 151 proposed development authorized under this subsection below the 152 highest currently allowed height for a commercial or residential 153 buildingdevelopmentlocated in its jurisdiction within one 154 quarter1mile of the proposed development or 3 stories, 155 whichever is higher. If the height of each building on property 156 adjacent to the proposed development is 3 stories or less, the 157 municipality may restrict the height to 135 percent of the 158 tallest building on property adjacent to the proposed 159 development or 3 stories, whichever is higher. The currently 160 allowed height does not include the height of any development 161 that meets the requirements of this subsection or any bonus, 162 variance, or other special exception for height provided in the 163 municipality’s land development regulations as an incentive for 164 development. 165 (d) A proposed development authorized under this subsection 166 must be administratively approved and no further action by the 167 governing body of the municipality is required if the 168 development satisfies the municipality’s land development 169 regulations for multifamily developments in areas zoned for such 170 use and is otherwise consistent with the comprehensive plan, 171 with the exception of provisions establishing allowable 172 densities, height, and land use. Such land development 173 regulations include, but are not limited to, regulations 174 relating to setbacks and parking requirements. A proposed 175 development located within one-quarter mile of a military 176 installation identified in s. 163.3175(2) may not be 177 administratively approved. Each municipality shall maintain on 178 its website a policy containing procedures and expectations for 179 administrative approval pursuant to this subsection. 180 (e)1. A municipality must consider reducing parking 181 requirements for a proposed development authorized under this 182 subsection if the development is located within one-quarterone183halfmile of amajortransit stop, as defined in the 184 municipality’s land development code, and themajortransit stop 185 is accessible from the development. 186 2. A municipality must reduce parking requirements for a 187 proposed development authorized under this subsection if the 188 development is located within one-half mile of a major 189 transportation hub that is accessible from the development by 190 safe, pedestrian-friendly means, such as sidewalks, crosswalks, 191 elevated pedestrian or bike paths, or other multimodal design 192 features. 193 3. A municipality must eliminate parking requirements for a 194 proposed mixed-use residential development authorized under this 195 subsection within an area recognized by the municipality as a 196 transit-oriented development or area, as provided in paragraph 197 (g). 198 4. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “major 199 transportation hub” means any transit station, whether bus, 200 train, or light rail, which is served by public transit with a 201 mix of other transportation options. 202 (f) A municipality that designates less than 20 percent of 203 the land area within its jurisdiction for commercialor204industrialuse must authorize a proposed multifamily development 205 as provided in this subsection in areas zoned for commercialor206industrialuse only if the proposed multifamily development is 207 mixed-use residential. 208 (g) A development authorized under this section which is 209 located within a transit-oriented development or area, as 210 recognized by the municipality, must be mixed-use residential 211 and otherwise comply with requirements of the municipality’s 212 regulations applicable to the transit-oriented development or 213 area except for use, height, density, and floor area ratio as 214 provided in this section or as otherwise agreed to by the 215 municipality and the applicant for the development. 216 (h) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a 217 development authorized under this subsection must comply with 218 all applicable state and local laws and regulations. 219 (i)(h)This subsection does not apply to airport-impacted 220 areas as provided in s. 333.03property defined as recreational221and commercial working waterfront in s. 342.201(2)(b) in any222area zoned as industrial. 223 (j)(i)This subsection expires October 1, 2033. 224 225 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 226 And the title is amended as follows: 227 Delete line 539 228 and insert: 229 websites; requiring counties and municipalities, 230 respectively, to consider reducing parking 231 requirements under certain circumstances; requiring 232 counties and municipalities, respectively, to reduce 233 or eliminate parking requirements for certain proposed 234 mixed-use developments that meet certain requirements; 235 defining the term “major transportation hub”; 236 providing certain requirements for developments 237 located within a transit-oriented development or area; 238 making technical changes; providing