Bill Text: FL S0914 | 2025 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Public Records and Meetings/Reports on Adversarial Threats
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2025-02-19 - Filed [S0914 Detail]
Download: Florida-2025-S0914-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 914 By Senator Collins 14-01900-25 2025914__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to public records and meetings; 3 amending s. 943.0315, F.S.; providing an exemption 4 from public record requirements for a certain report 5 on adversarial threats produced by the Chief of 6 Domestic Security; providing an exemption from public 7 record requirements for notifications provided to 8 owners and operators of critical infrastructure and 9 other assets; providing an exemption from public 10 meeting requirements for meetings of the Council on 11 Pacific Conflict in which such reports or 12 notifications are provided or discussed; providing for 13 future legislative review and repeal; providing 14 statements of public necessity; providing a contingent 15 effective date. 16 17 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 18 19 Section 1. Paragraphs (c) and (f) of subsection (7) of 20 section 943.0315, Florida Statutes, as created by SB 912 or 21 similar legislation, are amended, to read: 22 943.0315 Pacific Conflict Stress Test.— 23 (7) REPORT ON ADVERSARIAL THREATS TO STATE ASSETS, CRITICAL 24 INFRASTRUCTURE, AND MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.— 25 (c)1. No later than July 1, 2026, the Chief of Domestic 26 Security shall produce a report on adversarial threats to state 27 assets and critical infrastructure and military installations 28 which must be available to the Governor and the members of the 29 Council on Pacific Conflict. The report must include all of the 30 following: 31 a.1.Critical and other assets identified under paragraph 32 (b), including the specific risks posed to each infrastructure 33 system or asset in the event of a Pacific conflict. 34 b.2.Mitigation strategies and recommendations to limit or 35 eliminate the risk posed to the critical infrastructure, 36 military installations, or other assets in the event of a 37 Pacific conflict; and mitigation strategies and recommendations 38 that limit or eliminate the risk posed to the safety and 39 security of this state or nation in the event of a Pacific 40 conflict. 41 c.3.A risk-based list of critical infrastructure, military 42 installations, and other assets identified under paragraph (b), 43 the order of which must be determined by the degree to which: 44 (I)a.Each critical infrastructure system, military 45 installations, or other assets is in need of protective action; 46 and 47 (II)b.The debilitation of each critical infrastructure 48 system, military installations, or other assets would threaten 49 the safety and security of this state and the nation. 50 2. The report produced pursuant to this paragraph is 51 confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I 52 of the State Constitution. This subparagraph is subject to the 53 Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15 54 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2030, unless reviewed and 55 saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature. 56 (f) The Chief of Domestic Security, in coordination with 57 state agencies, shall notify owners and operators of critical 58 infrastructure and other assets identified under paragraph (b) 59 as having been identified as a potential target of malicious 60 actions by adversarial nations in the event of a Pacific 61 conflict. Such notification must ensure that owners and 62 operators are provided the basis for the determination made 63 under paragraph (b). Such notification is confidential and 64 exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State 65 Constitution. Any portion of a meeting of the Council on Pacific 66 Conflict during which such notifications are discussed or the 67 report produced under paragraph (c) is provided or discussed or 68 any other information is disclosed that is confidential or 69 exempt from public disclosure is exempt from s. 286.011 and s. 70 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. This paragraph is 71 subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance 72 with s. 119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2030, 73 unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the 74 Legislature. 75 Section 2. (1) The Legislature finds that it is a public 76 necessity that the report on adversarial threats to state assets 77 and critical infrastructure, military installations, and other 78 assets be made confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1), 79 Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Article I of the State 80 Constitution. Such report may contain information identifying 81 vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, state assets, and 82 military installations, the disclosure of which could lead to 83 malicious acts by bad actors. 84 (2) The Legislature further finds that it is a public 85 necessity that the notifications sent to owners or operators of 86 critical infrastructure and other assets that have been 87 identified as a potential target of malicious actions by 88 adversarial nations in the event of a Pacific conflict be exempt 89 from s. 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Article I of 90 the State Constitution. Such notifications may contain national 91 or state security information that, if made publicly available, 92 could increase the potential threats to the owners and operators 93 of critical infrastructure or other assets. 94 (3) The Legislature further finds that it is a public 95 necessity that any portion of a meeting of the Council on 96 Pacific Conflict during which confidential or confidential and 97 exempt information is discussed be exempt from s. 286.011, 98 Florida Statutes, and s. 24(b), Article I of the State 99 Constitution. Public discussion of vulnerabilities in critical 100 infrastructure, state assets, or military installations and 101 identification of the owners and operators of such critical 102 infrastructure would defeat the purpose of such information 103 being protected from disclosure. The ability of the council to 104 discuss matters of state and national security is beneficial in 105 the formulation of policy to protect critical infrastructure, 106 state assets, and military installations. 107 Section 3. This act shall take effect on the same day that 108 SB 912 or similar legislation takes effect, if such legislation 109 is adopted in the same legislative session or an extension 110 thereof and becomes a law.