Bill Text: FL S1120 | 2018 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Expert Witnesses
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 2-0)
Status: (Failed) 2018-03-10 - Died in Judiciary [S1120 Detail]
Download: Florida-2018-S1120-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2018 SB 1120
By Senator Perry
8-01041A-18 20181120__
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act relating to expert witnesses; amending s.
3 393.11, F.S.; requiring a court to pay reasonable fees
4 to members of an examining committee for their
5 evaluation and testimony regarding persons with
6 disabilities; deleting a provision specifying the
7 source of the fees to be paid; amending s. 744.331,
8 F.S.; requiring a court, rather than the state, to pay
9 certain fees if a ward is indigent; amending s.
10 916.115, F.S.; authorizing a court to initially
11 appoint one expert under certain circumstances;
12 authorizing a court to take less restrictive action
13 than commitment if an expert finds a defendant
14 incompetent; requiring that a defendant be evaluated
15 by no fewer than two experts before a court commits
16 the defendant; providing an exception; authorizing a
17 court to pay for up to two additional experts
18 appointed by the court under certain circumstances;
19 requiring a court to pay for the first, rather than
20 any, expert that it appoints under certain
21 circumstances; authorizing a party disputing a
22 determination of competence to request up to two
23 additional expert evaluations at that party’s expense;
24 providing for payments to experts for their testimony
25 under certain circumstances; amending s. 916.12, F.S.;
26 deleting provisions relating to the evaluation and
27 commitment of a defendant under certain circumstances;
28 amending s. 916.17, F.S.; requiring the court to pay
29 for the evaluation and testimony of an expert for a
30 defendant on conditional release under certain
31 circumstances; amending s. 916.301, F.S.; authorizing,
32 rather than requiring, a court to appoint up to two
33 additional experts to evaluate a defendant suspected
34 of having an intellectual disability or autism under
35 certain circumstances; providing for the payment of
36 additional experts under certain circumstances;
37 amending s. 916.304, F.S.; requiring the court to pay
38 for the evaluation and testimony of an expert for a
39 defendant on conditional release under certain
40 circumstances; amending s. 921.09, F.S.; authorizing a
41 defendant who has alleged insanity to retain, at the
42 defense’s expense rather than the county’s, one or
43 more physicians for certain purposes; deleting a
44 provision requiring fees to be paid by the county;
45 amending s. 921.12, F.S.; authorizing a defendant who
46 has an alleged pregnancy to retain, at the defense’s
47 expense rather than the county’s, one or more
48 physicians for certain purposes; amending s. 921.137,
49 F.S.; requiring the court to pay for the evaluation
50 and testimony of an expert for a defendant who raises
51 intellectual disability as a bar to a death sentence
52 under certain circumstances; amending s. 985.19, F.S.;
53 authorizing a court to initially appoint one expert to
54 evaluate a child’s mental condition, pending certain
55 determinations; authorizing a court to take less
56 restrictive action than commitment if an expert finds
57 a child incompetent; requiring that a child be
58 evaluated by no fewer than two experts before a court
59 commits the child; providing an exception; authorizing
60 a court to appoint up to two additional experts under
61 certain circumstances; authorizing a court to require
62 a hearing with certain testimony before ordering the
63 commitment of a child; requiring the court to pay
64 reasonable fees to the experts for their evaluations
65 and testimony; requiring a court to order the Agency
66 for Persons with Disabilities to select an expert to
67 examine a child for intellectual disability or autism;
68 deleting a provision requiring a specific
69 appropriation before the implementation of specified
70 provisions; amending ss. 29.006 and 29.007, F.S.;
71 conforming cross-references; providing an effective
72 date.
73
74 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
75
76 Section 1. Paragraph (g) of subsection (5) of section
77 393.11, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
78 393.11 Involuntary admission to residential services.—
79 (5) EXAMINING COMMITTEE.—
80 (g) The court Members of the examining committee shall pay
81 receive a reasonable fees, as fee to be determined by the court,
82 for the evaluation and testimony by members of the examining
83 committee. The fees shall be paid from the general revenue fund
84 of the county in which the person who has the intellectual
85 disability or autism resided when the petition was filed.
86 Section 2. Paragraph (b) of subsection (7) of section
87 744.331, Florida Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (a) of that
88 subsection is republished, to read:
89 744.331 Procedures to determine incapacity.—
90 (7) FEES.—
91 (a) The examining committee and any attorney appointed
92 under subsection (2) are entitled to reasonable fees to be
93 determined by the court.
94 (b) The fees awarded under paragraph (a) shall be paid by
95 the guardian from the property of the ward or, if the ward is
96 indigent, by the court state. The state shall have a creditor’s
97 claim against the guardianship property for any amounts paid
98 under this section. The state may file its claim within 90 days
99 after the entry of an order awarding attorney ad litem fees. If
100 the state does not file its claim within the 90-day period, the
101 state is thereafter barred from asserting the claim. Upon
102 petition by the state for payment of the claim, the court shall
103 enter an order authorizing immediate payment out of the property
104 of the ward. The state shall keep a record of the payments.
105 Section 3. Section 916.115, Florida Statutes, is amended to
106 read:
107 916.115 Appointment of experts.—
108 (1) The court shall appoint no more than three experts to
109 determine the mental condition of a defendant in a criminal
110 case, including competency to proceed, insanity, involuntary
111 placement, and treatment. The court may initially appoint one
112 expert for the evaluation, pending a determination of the
113 defendant’s competency and the parties’ positions on stipulating
114 to the findings. The experts may evaluate the defendant in jail
115 or in another appropriate local facility or in a facility of the
116 Department of Corrections.
117 (a) To the extent possible, the appointed experts shall
118 have completed forensic evaluator training approved by the
119 department, and each shall be a psychiatrist, licensed
120 psychologist, or physician.
121 (b) The department shall maintain and annually provide the
122 courts with a list of available mental health professionals who
123 have completed the approved training as experts.
124 (2) The court may take less restrictive action than
125 commitment authorized by this chapter or the Florida Rules of
126 Criminal Procedure if an expert determines that the defendant is
127 incompetent to proceed. A defendant must be evaluated by no
128 fewer than two experts before the court commits the defendant;
129 however, the court may commit the defendant without further
130 evaluation or hearing if one expert finds that the defendant is
131 incompetent to proceed and the parties stipulate to that
132 finding. If the parties do not stipulate to the finding of the
133 expert that the defendant is incompetent, the court may appoint
134 no more than two additional experts to evaluate the defendant.
135 Notwithstanding any stipulation by the parties, the court may
136 require a hearing with testimony from the experts before
137 ordering the commitment of a defendant.
138 (3)(a)(2) The court shall pay for the first any expert that
139 it appoints by court order, upon motion of counsel for the
140 defendant or the state or upon its own motion, and up to two
141 additional experts appointed by the court when the defendant is
142 found incompetent and the parties do not stipulate to the
143 findings.
144 (b) If the defense or the state retains an expert and
145 waives the confidentiality of the expert’s report, the court may
146 pay for no more than two additional experts appointed by court
147 order.
148 (c) If a first evaluation determines the defendant is
149 competent to proceed and a party disputes the findings, the
150 party disputing the determination may request up to two
151 additional experts to perform evaluations at the party’s
152 expense.
153 (d) If an expert appointed by the court upon motion of
154 counsel for the defendant specifically to evaluate the
155 competence of the defendant to proceed also addresses issues
156 related to sanity as an affirmative defense, the court shall pay
157 only for that portion of the expert’s fees relating to the
158 evaluation on competency to proceed, and the balance of the fees
159 shall be chargeable to the defense.
160 (e) If testimony from an expert is ordered by the court,
161 the court shall pay reasonable fees, as determined by the court,
162 to the expert. Testimony requested by the state or the defendant
163 shall be paid by the requesting party.
164 (f)(a) Pursuant to s. 29.006, the office of the public
165 defender shall pay for any expert retained by the office.
166 (g)(b) Pursuant to s. 29.005, the office of the state
167 attorney shall pay for any expert retained by the office and for
168 any expert whom the office retains and whom the office moves the
169 court to appoint in order to ensure that the expert has access
170 to the defendant.
171 (h)(c) An expert retained by the defendant who is
172 represented by private counsel appointed under s. 27.5303 shall
173 be paid by the Justice Administrative Commission.
174 (i)(d) An expert retained by a defendant who is indigent
175 for costs as determined by the court and who is represented by
176 private counsel, other than private counsel appointed under s.
177 27.5303, on a fee or pro bono basis, or who is representing
178 himself or herself, shall be paid by the Justice Administrative
179 Commission from funds specifically appropriated for these
180 expenses.
181 (j)(e) State employees shall be reimbursed for expenses
182 pursuant to s. 112.061.
183 (k)(f) The fees shall be taxed as costs in the case.
184 (l)(g) In order for an expert to be paid for the services
185 rendered, the expert’s report and testimony must explicitly
186 address each of the factors and follow the procedures set out in
187 this chapter and in the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
188 Section 4. Subsection (2) of section 916.12, Florida
189 Statutes, is amended, and subsection (1) of that section is
190 republished, to read:
191 916.12 Mental competence to proceed.—
192 (1) A defendant is incompetent to proceed within the
193 meaning of this chapter if the defendant does not have
194 sufficient present ability to consult with her or his lawyer
195 with a reasonable degree of rational understanding or if the
196 defendant has no rational, as well as factual, understanding of
197 the proceedings against her or him.
198 (2) Mental health experts appointed pursuant to s. 916.115
199 shall first determine whether the defendant has a mental illness
200 and, if so, consider the factors related to the issue of whether
201 the defendant meets the criteria for competence to proceed as
202 described in subsection (1). A defendant must be evaluated by no
203 fewer than two experts before the court commits the defendant or
204 takes other action authorized by this chapter or the Florida
205 Rules of Criminal Procedure, except if one expert finds that the
206 defendant is incompetent to proceed and the parties stipulate to
207 that finding, the court may commit the defendant or take other
208 action authorized by this chapter or the rules without further
209 evaluation or hearing, or the court may appoint no more than two
210 additional experts to evaluate the defendant. Notwithstanding
211 any stipulation by the state and the defendant, the court may
212 require a hearing with testimony from the expert or experts
213 before ordering the commitment of a defendant.
214 Section 5. Subsection (2) of section 916.17, Florida
215 Statutes, is amended to read:
216 916.17 Conditional release.—
217 (2) Upon the filing of an affidavit or statement under oath
218 by any person that the defendant has failed to comply with the
219 conditions of release, that the defendant’s condition has
220 deteriorated to the point that inpatient care is required, or
221 that the release conditions should be modified, the court shall
222 hold a hearing within 7 days after receipt of the affidavit or
223 statement under oath. After the hearing, the court may modify
224 the release conditions. The court may also order that the
225 defendant be returned to the department if it is found, after
226 the appointment and report of experts, that the person meets the
227 criteria for involuntary commitment under s. 916.13 or s.
228 916.15. The court shall pay reasonable fees, as determined by
229 the court, for the evaluation and testimony of the expert.
230 Section 6. Subsection (2) of section 916.301, Florida
231 Statutes, is amended to read:
232 916.301 Appointment of experts.—
233 (2) If a defendant’s suspected mental condition is
234 intellectual disability or autism, the court shall appoint the
235 following:
236 (a) At least one, or at the request of any party, two
237 experts to evaluate whether the defendant meets the definition
238 of intellectual disability or autism and, if so, whether the
239 defendant is competent to proceed; and
240 (b) Shall appoint a psychologist selected by the agency who
241 is licensed or authorized by law to practice in this state, with
242 experience in evaluating persons suspected of having an
243 intellectual disability or autism, and a social service
244 professional, with experience in working with persons who have
245 an intellectual disability or autism.
246 1. The psychologist shall evaluate whether the defendant
247 meets the definition of intellectual disability or autism and,
248 if so, whether the defendant is incompetent to proceed due to
249 intellectual disability or autism.
250 2. The social service professional shall provide a social
251 and developmental history of the defendant; and
252 (b) May, at the request of any party that does not
253 stipulate to findings of incompetence, appoint up to two
254 additional experts to evaluate whether the defendant meets the
255 definition of intellectual disability or autism and, if so,
256 whether the defendant is competent to proceed. The first
257 additional expert shall be paid by the court and the second
258 additional expert shall be paid by the requesting party.
259 However, if the first evaluation determines the defendant is
260 competent to proceed and a party disputes the findings, that
261 party may request up to two additional experts to perform
262 evaluations at the party’s expense.
263 Section 7. Subsection (2) of section 916.304, Florida
264 Statutes, is amended to read:
265 916.304 Conditional release.—
266 (2) Upon the filing of an affidavit or statement under oath
267 by any person that the defendant has failed to comply with the
268 conditions of release, that the defendant’s condition has
269 deteriorated, or that the release conditions should be modified,
270 the court shall hold a hearing within 7 days after receipt of
271 the affidavit or statement under oath. With notice to the court
272 and all parties, the agency may detain a defendant in a forensic
273 facility until the hearing occurs. After the hearing, the court
274 may modify the release conditions. The court may also order that
275 the defendant be placed into more appropriate programs for
276 further training or may order the defendant to be committed to a
277 forensic facility if it is found, after the appointment and
278 report of experts, that the defendant meets the criteria for
279 placement in a forensic facility. The court shall pay reasonable
280 fees, as determined by the court, for the evaluation and
281 testimony of the expert.
282 Section 8. Section 921.09, Florida Statutes, is amended to
283 read:
284 921.09 Fees of physicians who determine sanity at time of
285 sentence.—The court shall allow reasonable fees to physicians
286 appointed by the court to determine the mental condition of A
287 defendant who has alleged insanity as a cause for not
288 pronouncing sentence may, at the defense’s expense, retain one
289 or more physicians to determine the mental condition of the
290 defendant. The fees shall be paid by the county in which the
291 indictment was found or the information or affidavit filed.
292 Section 9. Section 921.12, Florida Statutes, is amended to
293 read:
294 921.12 Fees of physicians when pregnancy is alleged as
295 cause for not pronouncing sentence.—The court shall allow
296 reasonable fees to the physicians appointed to examine A
297 defendant who has alleged her pregnancy as a cause for not
298 pronouncing sentence may, at the defense’s expense, retain one
299 or more physicians to examine the defendant. The fees shall be
300 paid by the county in which the indictment was found or the
301 information or affidavit filed.
302 Section 10. Subsection (4) of section 921.137, Florida
303 Statutes, is amended to read:
304 921.137 Imposition of the death sentence upon an
305 intellectually disabled defendant prohibited.—
306 (4) After a defendant who has given notice of his or her
307 intention to raise intellectual disability as a bar to the death
308 sentence is convicted of a capital felony and an advisory jury
309 has returned a recommended sentence of death, the defendant may
310 file a motion to determine whether the defendant is
311 intellectually disabled. Upon receipt of the motion, the court
312 shall appoint two experts in the field of intellectual
313 disabilities who shall evaluate the defendant and report their
314 findings to the court and all interested parties before prior to
315 the final sentencing hearing. The court shall pay reasonable
316 fees, as determined by the court, for the evaluation and
317 testimony of the expert regardless of whether the defendant is
318 indigent. Notwithstanding s. 921.141 or s. 921.142, the final
319 sentencing hearing shall be held without a jury. At the final
320 sentencing hearing, the court shall consider the findings of the
321 court-appointed experts and consider the findings of any other
322 expert which is offered by the state or the defense on the issue
323 of whether the defendant has an intellectual disability. If the
324 court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
325 defendant has an intellectual disability as defined in
326 subsection (1), the court may not impose a sentence of death and
327 shall enter a written order that sets forth with specificity the
328 findings in support of the determination.
329 Section 11. Paragraphs (b) and (e) of subsection (1) and
330 subsection (7) of section 985.19, Florida Statutes, are amended
331 to read:
332 985.19 Incompetency in juvenile delinquency cases.—
333 (1) If, at any time prior to or during a delinquency case,
334 the court has reason to believe that the child named in the
335 petition may be incompetent to proceed with the hearing, the
336 court on its own motion may, or on the motion of the child’s
337 attorney or state attorney must, stay all proceedings and order
338 an evaluation of the child’s mental condition.
339 (b) All determinations of competency shall be made at a
340 hearing, with findings of fact based on an evaluation of the
341 child’s mental condition made by no not less than two nor more
342 than three experts appointed by the court. The court may
343 initially appoint one expert for the evaluation, pending a
344 determination of the child’s competency and the parties’
345 positions on stipulating to the findings. The basis for the
346 determination of incompetency must be specifically stated in the
347 evaluation. In addition, a recommendation as to whether
348 residential or nonresidential treatment or training is required
349 must be included in the evaluation. The court may take less
350 restrictive action than commitment authorized by this chapter or
351 the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure based on the
352 determination by one expert that the child is incompetent to
353 proceed. A child must be evaluated by no fewer than two experts
354 before the court commits the child; however, the court may
355 commit the child without further evaluation or hearing if one
356 expert finds that the child is incompetent to proceed and the
357 parties stipulate to that finding. If the parties do not
358 stipulate to the finding of the expert that the child is
359 incompetent, the court may appoint no more than two additional
360 experts to evaluate the child. Notwithstanding any stipulation
361 by the parties, the court may require a hearing with testimony
362 from one or more experts before ordering the commitment of a
363 child. Experts appointed by The court to determine the mental
364 condition of a child shall pay be allowed reasonable fees, as
365 determined by the court, for the evaluation and testimony
366 provided by the experts services rendered. State employees may
367 be paid expenses pursuant to s. 112.061. The fees shall be taxed
368 as costs in the case.
369 (e) For incompetency evaluations related to intellectual
370 disability or autism, the court shall order the Agency for
371 Persons with Disabilities to select the expert to examine the
372 child to determine if the child meets the definition of
373 “intellectual disability” or “autism” in s. 393.063 and, if so,
374 whether the child is competent to proceed with delinquency
375 proceedings.
376 (7) The provisions of this section shall be implemented
377 only subject to specific appropriation.
378 Section 12. Subsection (4) of section 29.006, Florida
379 Statutes, is amended to read:
380 29.006 Indigent defense costs.—For purposes of implementing
381 s. 14, Art. V of the State Constitution, the elements of the
382 public defenders’ offices and criminal conflict and civil
383 regional counsel offices to be provided from state revenues
384 appropriated by general law are as follows:
385 (4) Mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s.
386 394.473 and required in a court hearing involving an indigent,
387 and mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s.
388 916.115(3) s. 916.115(2) and required in a court hearing
389 involving an indigent.
390 Section 13. Subsection (5) of section 29.007, Florida
391 Statutes, is amended to read:
392 29.007 Court-appointed counsel.—For purposes of
393 implementing s. 14, Art. V of the State Constitution, the
394 elements of court-appointed counsel to be provided from state
395 revenues appropriated by general law are as follows:
396 (5) Mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s.
397 394.473 and required in a court hearing involving an indigent,
398 mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s. 916.115(3)
399 s. 916.115(2) and required in a court hearing involving an
400 indigent, and any other mental health professionals required by
401 law for the full adjudication of any civil case involving an
402 indigent person.
403
404 Subsections (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) apply when court
405 appointed counsel is appointed; when the court determines that
406 the litigant is indigent for costs; or when the litigant is
407 acting pro se and the court determines that the litigant is
408 indigent for costs at the trial or appellate level. This section
409 applies in any situation in which the court appoints counsel to
410 protect a litigant’s due process rights. The Justice
411 Administrative Commission shall approve uniform contract forms
412 for use in processing payments for due process services under
413 this section. In each case in which a private attorney
414 represents a person determined by the court to be indigent for
415 costs, the attorney shall execute the commission’s contract for
416 private attorneys representing persons determined to be indigent
417 for costs.
418 Section 14. This act shall take effect July 1, 2018.
