Bill Text: FL S1382 | 2017 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Expert Witnesses
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2017-05-05 - Died in Judiciary [S1382 Detail]
Download: Florida-2017-S1382-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2017 SB 1382 By Senator Perry 8-01132-17 20171382__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to expert witnesses; amending s. 3 393.11, F.S.; requiring the court to pay reasonable 4 fees to members of the examining committee for their 5 evaluation and testimony regarding persons with 6 disabilities; deleting a provision specifying the 7 source of the fees to be paid; amending s. 744.331, 8 F.S.; requiring a court, rather than the state, to pay 9 certain fees if a ward is indigent; amending s. 10 916.115, F.S.; authorizing a court to initially 11 appoint one expert under certain circumstances; 12 authorizing a court to take less restrictive action 13 than commitment if an expert finds a defendant 14 incompetent; requiring that a defendant be evaluated 15 by no fewer than two experts before a court commits 16 the defendant; providing an exception; authorizing a 17 court to pay for up to two additional experts 18 appointed by the court under certain circumstances; 19 authorizing a party disputing a determination of 20 competence to request two additional expert 21 evaluations at that party’s expense; providing for 22 payments to experts for their testimony under certain 23 circumstances; amending s. 916.12, F.S.; deleting 24 provisions relating to the evaluation and commitment 25 of a defendant under certain circumstances; amending 26 s. 916.17, F.S.; requiring the court to pay for the 27 evaluation and testimony of an expert for a defendant 28 on conditional release under certain circumstances; 29 amending s. 916.301, F.S.; authorizing, rather than 30 requiring, a court to appoint up to two additional 31 experts to evaluate a defendant suspected of having an 32 intellectual disability or autism under certain 33 circumstances; providing for the payment of additional 34 experts under certain circumstances; amending s. 35 916.304, F.S.; requiring the court to pay for the 36 evaluation and testimony of an expert for a defendant 37 on conditional release under certain circumstances; 38 amending s. 921.09, F.S.; authorizing a defendant who 39 has alleged insanity to retain, at the defendant’s 40 expense rather than the county’s, one or more 41 physicians; deleting a provision requiring fees to be 42 paid by the county; amending s. 921.12, F.S.; 43 authorizing a defendant who has an alleged pregnancy 44 to retain, at the defendant’s expense rather than the 45 county’s, one or more physicians; amending s. 921.137, 46 F.S.; requiring the court to pay for the evaluation 47 and testimony of an expert for a defendant who raises 48 intellectual disability as a bar to a death sentence 49 under certain circumstances; amending s. 985.19, F.S.; 50 authorizing a court to initially appoint one expert to 51 evaluate a child’s mental condition, pending certain 52 determinations; authorizing a court to take less 53 restrictive action than commitment if an expert finds 54 a child incompetent; requiring that a child be 55 evaluated by no fewer than two experts before a court 56 commits the child; providing an exception; authorizing 57 a court to appoint up to two additional experts under 58 certain circumstances; authorizing a court to require 59 a hearing with certain testimony before ordering the 60 commitment of a child; requiring the court to pay 61 reasonable fees to the experts for their evaluations 62 and testimony; requiring a court to order the Agency 63 for Persons with Disabilities to select an expert to 64 examine a child for intellectual disability or autism; 65 deleting a provision requiring a specific 66 appropriation before the implementation of specified 67 provisions; amending ss. 29.006 and 29.007, F.S; 68 conforming cross-references; providing an effective 69 date. 70 71 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 72 73 Section 1. Paragraph (g) of subsection (5) of section 74 393.11, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 75 393.11 Involuntary admission to residential services.— 76 (5) EXAMINING COMMITTEE.— 77 (g) The courtMembers of the examining committeeshall pay 78receive areasonable fees, asfee to bedetermined by the court, 79 for the evaluation and testimony by members of the examining 80 committee.The fees shall be paid from the general revenue fund81of the county in which the person who has the intellectual82disability or autism resided when the petition was filed.83 Section 2. Paragraph (b) of subsection (7) of section 84 744.331, Florida Statutes, is amended, and paragraph (a) of that 85 subsection is republished, to read: 86 744.331 Procedures to determine incapacity.— 87 (7) FEES.— 88 (a) The examining committee and any attorney appointed 89 under subsection (2) are entitled to reasonable fees to be 90 determined by the court. 91 (b) The fees awarded under paragraph (a) shall be paid by 92 the guardian from the property of the ward or, if the ward is 93 indigent, by the courtstate. The state shall have a creditor’s 94 claim against the guardianship property for any amounts paid 95 under this section. The state may file its claim within 90 days 96 after the entry of an order awarding attorney ad litem fees. If 97 the state does not file its claim within the 90-day period, the 98 state is thereafter barred from asserting the claim. Upon 99 petition by the state for payment of the claim, the court shall 100 enter an order authorizing immediate payment out of the property 101 of the ward. The state shall keep a record of the payments. 102 Section 3. Section 916.115, Florida Statutes, is amended to 103 read: 104 916.115 Appointment of experts.— 105 (1) The court shall appoint no more than three experts to 106 determine the mental condition of a defendant in a criminal 107 case, including competency to proceed, insanity, involuntary 108 placement, and treatment. The court may initially appoint one 109 expert for the evaluation, pending a determination of the 110 defendant’s competency and the parties’ positions on stipulating 111 to the findings. The experts may evaluate the defendant in jail 112 or in another appropriate local facility or in a facility of the 113 Department of Corrections. 114 (a) To the extent possible, the appointed experts shall 115 have completed forensic evaluator training approved by the 116 department, and each shall be a psychiatrist, licensed 117 psychologist, or physician. 118 (b) The department shall maintain and annually provide the 119 courts with a list of available mental health professionals who 120 have completed the approved training as experts. 121 (2) The court may take less restrictive action than 122 commitment authorized by this chapter or the Florida Rules of 123 Criminal Procedure based on the determination by one expert that 124 the defendant is incompetent to proceed. A defendant must be 125 evaluated by no fewer than two experts before the court commits 126 the defendant; however, the court may commit the defendant 127 without further evaluation or hearing if one expert finds that 128 the defendant is incompetent to proceed and the parties 129 stipulate to that finding. If the parties do not stipulate to 130 the finding of the expert that the defendant is incompetent, the 131 court may appoint no more than two additional experts to 132 evaluate the defendant. Notwithstanding any stipulation by the 133 parties, the court may require a hearing with testimony from the 134 experts before ordering the commitment of a defendant. 135 (3)(a)(2)The court shall pay for any expert that it 136 appoints by court order, upon motion of counsel for the 137 defendant or the state or upon its own motion, and up to two 138 additional experts appointed by the court when the defendant is 139 found incompetent and the parties do not stipulate to the 140 findings. 141 (b) If the defense or the state retains an expert and 142 waives the confidentiality of the expert’s report, the court may 143 pay for no more than two additional experts appointed by court 144 order. 145 (c) If a first evaluation determines the defendant is 146 competent to proceed and a party disputes the findings, the 147 party disputing the determination may request up to two 148 additional experts to perform evaluations at the party’s 149 expense. 150 (d) If an expert appointed by the court upon motion of 151 counsel for the defendant specifically to evaluate the 152 competence of the defendant to proceed also addresses issues 153 related to sanity as an affirmative defense, the court shall pay 154 only for that portion of the expert’s fees relating to the 155 evaluation on competency to proceed, and the balance of the fees 156 shall be chargeable to the defense. 157 (e) If testimony from the expert is ordered by the court, 158 the court shall pay reasonable fees, as determined by the court, 159 to the expert. Testimony requested by the state or the defendant 160 shall be paid by the requesting party. 161 (f)(a)Pursuant to s. 29.006, the office of the public 162 defender shall pay for any expert retained by the office. 163 (g)(b)Pursuant to s. 29.005, the office of the state 164 attorney shall pay for any expert retained by the office and for 165 any expert whom the office retains and whom the office moves the 166 court to appoint in order to ensure that the expert has access 167 to the defendant. 168 (h)(c)An expert retained by the defendant who is 169 represented by private counsel appointed under s. 27.5303 shall 170 be paid by the Justice Administrative Commission. 171 (i)(d)An expert retained by a defendant who is indigent 172 for costs as determined by the court and who is represented by 173 private counsel, other than private counsel appointed under s. 174 27.5303, on a fee or pro bono basis, or who is representing 175 himself or herself, shall be paid by the Justice Administrative 176 Commission from funds specifically appropriated for these 177 expenses. 178 (j)(e)State employees shall be reimbursed for expenses 179 pursuant to s. 112.061. 180 (k)(f)The fees shall be taxed as costs in the case. 181 (l)(g)In order for an expert to be paid for the services 182 rendered, the expert’s report and testimony must explicitly 183 address each of the factors and follow the procedures set out in 184 this chapter and in the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. 185 Section 4. Subsection (2) of section 916.12, Florida 186 Statutes, is amended, and subsection (1) of that section is 187 republished, to read: 188 916.12 Mental competence to proceed.— 189 (1) A defendant is incompetent to proceed within the 190 meaning of this chapter if the defendant does not have 191 sufficient present ability to consult with her or his lawyer 192 with a reasonable degree of rational understanding or if the 193 defendant has no rational, as well as factual, understanding of 194 the proceedings against her or him. 195 (2) Mental health experts appointed pursuant to s. 916.115 196 shall first determine whether the defendant has a mental illness 197 and, if so, consider the factors related to the issue of whether 198 the defendant meets the criteria for competence to proceed as 199 described in subsection (1).A defendant must be evaluated by no200fewer than two experts before the court commits the defendant or201takes other action authorized by this chapter or the Florida202Rules of Criminal Procedure, except if one expert finds that the203defendant is incompetent to proceed and the parties stipulate to204that finding, the court may commit the defendant or take other205action authorized by this chapter or the rules without further206evaluation or hearing, or the court may appoint no more than two207additional experts to evaluate the defendant. Notwithstanding208any stipulation by the state and the defendant, the court may209require a hearing with testimony from the expert or experts210before ordering the commitment of a defendant.211 Section 5. Subsection (2) of section 916.17, Florida 212 Statutes, is amended to read: 213 916.17 Conditional release.— 214 (2) Upon the filing of an affidavit or statement under oath 215 by any person that the defendant has failed to comply with the 216 conditions of release, that the defendant’s condition has 217 deteriorated to the point that inpatient care is required, or 218 that the release conditions should be modified, the court shall 219 hold a hearing within 7 days after receipt of the affidavit or 220 statement under oath. After the hearing, the court may modify 221 the release conditions. The court may also order that the 222 defendant be returned to the department if it is found, after 223 the appointment and report of experts, that the person meets the 224 criteria for involuntary commitment under s. 916.13 or s. 225 916.15. The court shall pay reasonable fees, as determined by 226 the court, for the evaluation and testimony of the expert. 227 Section 6. Subsection (2) of section 916.301, Florida 228 Statutes, is amended to read: 229 916.301 Appointment of experts.— 230 (2) If a defendant’s suspected mental condition is 231 intellectual disability or autism, the courtshall appointthe232following: 233 (a)At least one, or at the request of any party, two234experts to evaluate whether the defendant meets the definition235of intellectual disability or autism and, if so, whether the236defendant is competent to proceed; and237(b)Shall appoint a psychologist selected by the agency who 238 is licensed or authorized by law to practice in this state, with 239 experience in evaluating persons suspected of having an 240 intellectual disability or autism, and a social service 241 professional, with experience in working with persons who have 242 an intellectual disability or autism. 243 1. The psychologist shall evaluate whether the defendant 244 meets the definition of intellectual disability or autism and, 245 if so, whether the defendant is incompetent to proceed due to 246 intellectual disability or autism. 247 2. The social service professional shall provide a social 248 and developmental history of the defendant; and 249 (b) May, at the request of any party that does not 250 stipulate to findings of incompetence, appoint up to two 251 additional experts to evaluate whether the defendant meets the 252 definition of intellectual disability or autism and, if so, 253 whether the defendant is competent to proceed. The first 254 additional expert shall be paid by the court and the second 255 additional expert shall be paid by the requesting party. 256 However, if the first evaluation determines the defendant is 257 competent to proceed and a party disputes the findings, that 258 party may request up to two additional experts to perform 259 evaluations at the party’s expense. 260 Section 7. Subsection (2) of section 916.304, Florida 261 Statutes, is amended to read: 262 916.304 Conditional release.— 263 (2) Upon the filing of an affidavit or statement under oath 264 by any person that the defendant has failed to comply with the 265 conditions of release, that the defendant’s condition has 266 deteriorated, or that the release conditions should be modified, 267 the court shall hold a hearing within 7 days after receipt of 268 the affidavit or statement under oath. With notice to the court 269 and all parties, the agency may detain a defendant in a forensic 270 facility until the hearing occurs. After the hearing, the court 271 may modify the release conditions. The court may also order that 272 the defendant be placed into more appropriate programs for 273 further training or may order the defendant to be committed to a 274 forensic facility if it is found, after the appointment and 275 report of experts, that the defendant meets the criteria for 276 placement in a forensic facility. The court shall pay reasonable 277 fees, as determined by the court, for the evaluation and 278 testimony of the expert. 279 Section 8. Section 921.09, Florida Statutes, is amended to 280 read: 281 921.09 Fees of physicians who determine sanity at time of 282 sentence.—The court shall allow reasonable fees to physicians283appointed by the court to determine the mental condition ofA 284 defendant who has alleged insanity as a cause for not 285 pronouncing sentence may, at the defense’s expense, retain one 286 or more physicians to determine the mental condition of the 287 defendant.The fees shall be paid by the county in which the288indictment was found or the information or affidavit filed.289 Section 9. Section 921.12, Florida Statutes, is amended to 290 read: 291 921.12 Fees of physicians when pregnancy is alleged as 292 cause for not pronouncing sentence.—The court shall allow293reasonable fees to the physicians appointed to examineA 294 defendant who has alleged her pregnancy as a cause for not 295 pronouncing sentence may, at the defense’s expense, retain one 296 or more physicians to examine the defendant.The fees shall be297paid by the county in which the indictment was found or the298information or affidavit filed.299 Section 10. Subsection (4) of section 921.137, Florida 300 Statutes, is amended to read: 301 921.137 Imposition of the death sentence upon an 302 intellectually disabled defendant prohibited.— 303 (4) After a defendant who has given notice of his or her 304 intention to raise intellectual disability as a bar to the death 305 sentence is convicted of a capital felony and an advisory jury 306 has returned a recommended sentence of death, the defendant may 307 file a motion to determine whether the defendant is 308 intellectually disabled. Upon receipt of the motion, the court 309 shall appoint two experts in the field of intellectual 310 disabilities who shall evaluate the defendant and report their 311 findings to the court and all interested parties beforeprior to312 the final sentencing hearing. The court shall pay reasonable 313 fees, as determined by the court, for the evaluation and 314 testimony of the expert regardless of whether the defendant is 315 indigent. Notwithstanding s. 921.141 or s. 921.142, the final 316 sentencing hearing shall be held without a jury. At the final 317 sentencing hearing, the court shall consider the findings of the 318 court-appointed experts and consider the findings of any other 319 expert which is offered by the state or the defense on the issue 320 of whether the defendant has an intellectual disability. If the 321 court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the 322 defendant has an intellectual disability as defined in 323 subsection (1), the court may not impose a sentence of death and 324 shall enter a written order that sets forth with specificity the 325 findings in support of the determination. 326 Section 11. Paragraphs (b) and (e) of subsection (1) and 327 subsection (7) of section 985.19, Florida Statutes, are amended 328 to read: 329 985.19 Incompetency in juvenile delinquency cases.— 330 (1) If, at any time prior to or during a delinquency case, 331 the court has reason to believe that the child named in the 332 petition may be incompetent to proceed with the hearing, the 333 court on its own motion may, or on the motion of the child’s 334 attorney or state attorney must, stay all proceedings and order 335 an evaluation of the child’s mental condition. 336 (b) All determinations of competency shall be made at a 337 hearing, with findings of fact based on an evaluation of the 338 child’s mental condition made by nonot less than two normore 339 than three experts appointed by the court. The court may 340 initially appoint one expert for the evaluation, pending a 341 determination of the child’s competency and the parties’ 342 positions on stipulating to the findings. The basis for the 343 determination of incompetency must be specifically stated in the 344 evaluation. In addition, a recommendation as to whether 345 residential or nonresidential treatment or training is required 346 must be included in the evaluation. The court may take less 347 restrictive action than commitment authorized by this chapter or 348 the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure based on the 349 determination by one expert that the child is incompetent to 350 proceed. A child must be evaluated by no fewer than two experts 351 before the court commits the child; however, the court may 352 commit the child without further evaluation or hearing if one 353 expert finds that the child is incompetent to proceed and the 354 parties stipulate to that finding. If the parties do not 355 stipulate to the finding of the expert that the child is 356 incompetent, the court may appoint no more than two additional 357 experts to evaluate the child. Notwithstanding any stipulation 358 by the parties, the court may require a hearing with testimony 359 from one or more experts before ordering the commitment of a 360 child.Experts appointed byThe courtto determine the mental361condition of a childshall paybe allowedreasonable fees, as 362 determined by the court, for the evaluation and testimony of the 363 expertsservices rendered. State employees may be paid expenses 364 pursuant to s. 112.061. The fees shall be taxed as costs in the 365 case. 366 (e) For incompetency evaluations related to intellectual 367 disability or autism, the court shall order the Agency for 368 Persons with Disabilities to select the expert to examine the 369 child to determine if the child meets the definition of 370 “intellectual disability” or “autism” in s. 393.063 and, if so, 371 whether the child is competent to proceed with delinquency 372 proceedings. 373(7) The provisions of this section shall be implemented374only subject to specific appropriation.375 Section 12. Subsection (4) of section 29.006, Florida 376 Statutes, is amended to read: 377 29.006 Indigent defense costs.—For purposes of implementing 378 s. 14, Art. V of the State Constitution, the elements of the 379 public defenders’ offices and criminal conflict and civil 380 regional counsel offices to be provided from state revenues 381 appropriated by general law are as follows: 382 (4) Mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s. 383 394.473 and required in a court hearing involving an indigent, 384 and mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s. 385 916.115(3)s. 916.115(2)and required in a court hearing 386 involving an indigent. 387 Section 13. Subsection (5) of section 29.007, Florida 388 Statutes, is amended to read: 389 29.007 Court-appointed counsel.—For purposes of 390 implementing s. 14, Art. V of the State Constitution, the 391 elements of court-appointed counsel to be provided from state 392 revenues appropriated by general law are as follows: 393 (5) Mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s. 394 394.473 and required in a court hearing involving an indigent, 395 mental health professionals appointed pursuant to s. 916.115(3) 396s. 916.115(2)and required in a court hearing involving an 397 indigent, and any other mental health professionals required by 398 law for the full adjudication of any civil case involving an 399 indigent person. 400 401 Subsections (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) apply when court 402 appointed counsel is appointed; when the court determines that 403 the litigant is indigent for costs; or when the litigant is 404 acting pro se and the court determines that the litigant is 405 indigent for costs at the trial or appellate level. This section 406 applies in any situation in which the court appoints counsel to 407 protect a litigant’s due process rights. The Justice 408 Administrative Commission shall approve uniform contract forms 409 for use in processing payments for due process services under 410 this section. In each case in which a private attorney 411 represents a person determined by the court to be indigent for 412 costs, the attorney shall execute the commission’s contract for 413 private attorneys representing persons determined to be indigent 414 for costs. 415 Section 14. This act shall take effect July 1, 2017.