Bill Text: FL S1720 | 2019 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Property Rights
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Failed) 2019-05-03 - Died in Judiciary [S1720 Detail]
Download: Florida-2019-S1720-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2019 SB 1720
By Senator Lee
20-01708-19 20191720__
1 A bill to be entitled
2 An act relating to property rights; amending s.
3 70.001, F.S.; revising legislative findings; providing
4 applicability relating to claims that involve one or
5 more residential properties which are brought as a
6 result of certain regulations or ordinances;
7 authorizing a property owner to waive a jury and
8 request that the court make a determination of
9 compensation; revising the calculation for costs a
10 property owner is entitled to recover; authorizing a
11 property owner to bring a claim under certain
12 circumstances when he or she is not provided certain
13 notice; amending s. 70.45, F.S.; authorizing a
14 property owner to bring an action to declare a
15 prohibited exaction invalid; making clarifying
16 changes; providing an effective date.
17
18 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
19
20 Section 1. Present paragraph (d) of subsection (4) of
21 section 70.001, Florida Statutes, is redesignated as paragraph
22 (e), a new paragraph (d) is added to that subsection, and
23 subsections (1) and (6) and paragraph (a) of subsection (11) of
24 that section are amended, to read:
25 70.001 Private property rights protection.—
26 (1) This act may be cited as the “Bert J. Harris, Jr.,
27 Private Property Rights Protection Act.” The Legislature
28 recognizes that some laws, regulations, and ordinances of the
29 state and political entities in the state, as applied, may
30 inordinately burden, restrict, or limit private property rights
31 without amounting to a taking under the State Constitution or
32 the United States Constitution. The Legislature determines that
33 there is an important state interest in protecting the interests
34 of private property owners from such inordinate burdens. The
35 Legislature further recognizes that it is in the public interest
36 to ensure that similarly situated properties are subject to the
37 same rules and regulations. Therefore, it is the intent of the
38 Legislature that, as a separate and distinct cause of action
39 from the law of takings, the Legislature herein provides for
40 relief, or payment of compensation, when a new law, rule,
41 regulation, or ordinance of the state or a political entity in
42 the state, as applied, unfairly affects real property.
43 (4)
44 (d) When the claim involves one or more residential
45 properties and is brought as a result of the enactment of a
46 governmental entity’s regulation or ordinance that applies to
47 residential property, any settlement offer that includes a
48 modification or variance to such regulation or ordinance applies
49 to all similarly situated residential properties subject to
50 regulation by the governmental entity.
51 (6)(a) The circuit court shall determine whether an
52 existing use of the real property or a vested right to a
53 specific use of the real property existed and, if so, whether,
54 considering the settlement offer and statement of allowable
55 uses, the governmental entity or entities have inordinately
56 burdened the real property. If the actions of more than one
57 governmental entity, considering any settlement offers and
58 statement of allowable uses, are responsible for the action that
59 imposed the inordinate burden on the real property of the
60 property owner, the court shall determine the percentage of
61 responsibility each such governmental entity bears with respect
62 to the inordinate burden. A governmental entity may take an
63 interlocutory appeal of the court’s determination that the
64 action of the governmental entity has resulted in an inordinate
65 burden. An interlocutory appeal does not automatically stay the
66 proceedings; however, the court may stay the proceedings during
67 the pendency of the interlocutory appeal. If the governmental
68 entity does not prevail in the interlocutory appeal, the court
69 shall award to the prevailing property owner the costs and a
70 reasonable attorney fee incurred by the property owner in the
71 interlocutory appeal.
72 (b) Following its determination of the percentage of
73 responsibility of each governmental entity, and following the
74 resolution of any interlocutory appeal, the court shall impanel
75 a jury to determine the total amount of compensation to the
76 property owner for the loss in value due to the inordinate
77 burden to the real property. The property owner may waive a jury
78 and request that the court make such determination. The award of
79 compensation shall be determined by calculating the difference
80 in the fair market value of the real property, as it existed at
81 the time of the governmental action at issue, as though the
82 owner had the ability to attain the reasonable investment-backed
83 expectation or was not left with uses that are unreasonable,
84 whichever the case may be, and the fair market value of the real
85 property, as it existed at the time of the governmental action
86 at issue, as inordinately burdened, considering the settlement
87 offer together with the statement of allowable uses, of the
88 governmental entity or entities. In determining the award of
89 compensation, consideration may not be given to business damages
90 relative to any development, activity, or use that the action of
91 the governmental entity or entities, considering the settlement
92 offer together with the statement of allowable uses has
93 restricted, limited, or prohibited. The award of compensation
94 shall include a reasonable award of prejudgment interest from
95 the date the claim was presented to the governmental entity or
96 entities as provided in subsection (4).
97 (c)1. In any action filed pursuant to this section, the
98 property owner is entitled to recover reasonable costs and
99 attorney fees incurred by the property owner, from the
100 governmental entity or entities, according to their
101 proportionate share as determined by the court, from the date of
102 presenting the claim to the governmental entity pursuant to
103 paragraph (4)(a) the filing of the circuit court action, if the
104 property owner prevails in the action and the court determines
105 that the settlement offer, including the statement of allowable
106 uses, of the governmental entity or entities did not constitute
107 a bona fide offer to the property owner which reasonably would
108 have resolved the claim, based upon the knowledge available to
109 the governmental entity or entities and the property owner
110 during the 90-day-notice period or the 150-day-notice period.
111 2. In any action filed pursuant to this section, the
112 governmental entity or entities are entitled to recover
113 reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by the governmental
114 entity or entities from the date of the filing of the circuit
115 court action, if the governmental entity or entities prevail in
116 the action and the court determines that the property owner did
117 not accept a bona fide settlement offer, including the statement
118 of allowable uses, which reasonably would have resolved the
119 claim fairly to the property owner if the settlement offer had
120 been accepted by the property owner, based upon the knowledge
121 available to the governmental entity or entities and the
122 property owner during the 90-day-notice period or the 150-day
123 notice period.
124 3. The determination of total reasonable costs and attorney
125 fees pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the court and
126 not by the jury. Any proposed settlement offer or any proposed
127 decision, except for the final written settlement offer or the
128 final written statement of allowable uses, and any negotiations
129 or rejections in regard to the formulation either of the
130 settlement offer or the statement of allowable uses, are
131 inadmissible in the subsequent proceeding established by this
132 section except for the purposes of the determination pursuant to
133 this paragraph.
134 (d) Within 15 days after the execution of any settlement
135 pursuant to this section, or the issuance of any judgment
136 pursuant to this section, the governmental entity shall provide
137 a copy of the settlement or judgment to the Department of Legal
138 Affairs.
139 (11) A cause of action may not be commenced under this
140 section if the claim is presented more than 1 year after a law
141 or regulation is first applied by the governmental entity to the
142 property at issue.
143 (a) For purposes of determining when this 1-year claim
144 period accrues:
145 1.a. A law or regulation is first applied upon enactment
146 and notice as provided for in this sub-subparagraph subparagraph
147 if the impact of the law or regulation on the real property is
148 clear and unequivocal in its terms and notice is provided by
149 mail to the affected property owner or registered agent at the
150 address referenced in the jurisdiction’s most current ad valorem
151 tax records. The fact that the law or regulation could be
152 modified, varied, or altered under any other process or
153 procedure does not preclude the impact of the law or regulation
154 on a property from being clear or unequivocal pursuant to this
155 sub-subparagraph subparagraph. Any notice under this sub
156 subparagraph subparagraph shall be provided after the enactment
157 of the law or regulation and shall inform the property owner or
158 registered agent that the law or regulation may impact the
159 property owner’s existing property rights and that the property
160 owner may have only 1 year from receipt of the notice to pursue
161 any rights established under this section.
162 b. If a property owner is not provided notice pursuant to
163 sub-subparagraph a., the property owner may bring a claim
164 against the governmental entity after the enactment of the law
165 or regulation if the law or regulation’s effect on the real
166 property is clear and unequivocal in its terms. In such cases, a
167 property owner is not required to submit a formal application
168 for development or to proceed through any formal application
169 process if such action would be futile and a waste of resources.
170 2. Otherwise, the law or regulation is first applied to the
171 property when there is a formal denial of a written request for
172 development or variance.
173 Section 2. Subsections (2), (4), and (5) of section 70.45,
174 Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
175 70.45 Governmental exactions.—
176 (2) In addition to other remedies available in law or
177 equity, a property owner may bring an action in a court of
178 competent jurisdiction under this section to declare a
179 prohibited exaction invalid and to recover damages caused by a
180 prohibited exaction. Such action may not be brought until a
181 prohibited exaction is actually imposed or required in writing
182 as a final condition of approval for the requested use of real
183 property. The right to bring an action under this section may
184 not be waived. This section does not apply to impact fees
185 adopted under s. 163.31801 or non-ad valorem assessments as
186 defined in s. 197.3632.
187 (4) For each claim filed under this section, the
188 governmental entity has the burden of proving that the
189 challenged exaction has an essential nexus to a legitimate
190 public purpose and is roughly proportionate to the impacts of
191 the proposed use that the governmental entity is seeking to
192 avoid, minimize, or mitigate. The property owner has the burden
193 of proving damages that result from a prohibited exaction.
194 (5) The court may award attorney fees and costs to the
195 prevailing party; however, if the court determines that the
196 challenged exaction which is the subject of the claim lacks an
197 essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose, the court shall
198 award attorney fees and costs to the property owner.
199 Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2019.
