Bill Text: HI HB2241 | 2012 | Regular Session | Amended


Bill Title: Antique Gambling Devices; Slot Machines

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 6-0)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2012-03-08 - (S) Referred to JDL. [HB2241 Detail]

Download: Hawaii-2012-HB2241-Amended.html

 

 

STAND. COM. REP. NO.  678-12

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                , 2012

 

RE:   H.B. No. 2241

      H.D. 1

 

 

 

 

Honorable Calvin K.Y. Say

Speaker, House of Representatives

Twenty-Sixth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2012

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Judiciary, to which was referred H.B. No. 2241 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO ANTIQUE GAMBLING DEVICES,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose of this measure is to exempt antique slot machines from the offense of possession of a gambling device.

 

     Two concerned citizens testified in support of this measure.  Hawaii Coalition Against Legalized Gambling, Aupuni O Hawaii, and a concerned citizen provided testimony in opposition to this measure.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Replacing the term "antique slot machine" with "antique gambling device" to conform the exemption with existing law;

 

     (2)  Defining "antique gambling device" as any inoperable, non-electronic, mechanical gambling device that is at least 25 years old and is used for display purposes only;

 

     (3)  Changing the effective date to January 7, 2059, to encourage further discussion; and

 

     (4)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity, consistency, and style.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Judiciary that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 2241, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 2241, H.D. 1, and be placed on the calendar for Third Reading.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Judiciary,

 

 

 

 

____________________________

GILBERT KEITH-AGARAN, Chair

 

 

 

 

 

feedback