Bill Text: IL HB3420 | 2023-2024 | 103rd General Assembly | Introduced

---

Bill Title: Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original or derivative, may not be received into evidence against that defendant in a criminal proceeding unless the evidence is determined by the court to be relevant and admissible, after an offer of proof by the proponent of the evidence outside the hearing of the jury, or the hearing as the court may require, and an on-the-record statement by the court of the findings of fact essential to its determination. Provides that in order to overcome the presumption of inadmissibility of evidence of defendant's creative or artistic expression, the proffering party must affirmatively prove by clear and convincing evidence: (1) literal, rather than figurative or fictional, meaning and, where the work is derivative, that the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the work as the defendant's own thought or statement; (2) a strong factual nexus indicating that the creative or artistic expression refers to the specific facts of the crime alleged; (3) relevance to an issue of fact that is disputed; and (4) distinct probative value not provided by other admissible evidence. Provides that if the court admits creative or artistic expression as criminal evidence, the court has a duty to apply careful redactions, provide limiting instructions, and consider the least prejudicial means of presenting the creative or artistic expression to the fact finder.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2023-03-10 - Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee [HB3420 Detail]

Download: Illinois-2023-HB3420-Introduced.html

---

103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2023 and 2024 HB3420 Introduced , by Rep. Justin Slaughter SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
725 ILCS 5/115-7.5 new
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original or derivative, may not be received into evidence against that defendant in a criminal proceeding unless the evidence is determined by the court to be relevant and admissible, after an offer of proof by the proponent of the evidence outside the hearing of the jury, or the hearing as the court may require, and an on-the-record statement by the court of the findings of fact essential to its determination. Provides that in order to overcome the presumption of inadmissibility of evidence of defendant's creative or artistic expression, the proffering party must affirmatively prove by clear and convincing evidence: (1) literal, rather than figurative or fictional, meaning and, where the work is derivative, that the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the work as the defendant's own thought or statement; (2) a strong factual nexus indicating that the creative or artistic expression refers to the specific facts of the crime alleged; (3) relevance to an issue of fact that is disputed; and (4) distinct probative value not provided by other admissible evidence. Provides that if the court admits creative or artistic expression as criminal evidence, the court has a duty to apply careful redactions, provide limiting instructions, and consider the least prejudicial means of presenting the creative or artistic expression to the fact finder.
LRB103 30115 RLC 56539 b
A BILL FOR
HB3420 LRB103 30115 RLC 56539 b
AN ACT concerning criminal law.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 5. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
amended by adding Section 115-7.5 as follows:
(725 ILCS 5/115-7.5 new)
Sec. 115-7.5. Admissibility of evidence of defendant's
creative or artistic expression.
(a) In this Section, "creative or artistic expression"
means the expression or application of creativity or
imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, sounds,
words, movements, or symbols, including, but not limited to,
music, dance, performance art, visual art, poetry, literature,
film, and other such objects or media.
(b) Evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic
expression, whether original or derivative, may not be
received into evidence against that defendant in a criminal
proceeding unless the evidence is determined by the court to
be relevant and admissible, after an offer of proof by the
proponent of the evidence outside the hearing of the jury, or
the hearing as the court may require, and an on-the-record
statement by the court of the findings of fact essential to its
determination.

HB3420 - 2 - LRB103 30115 RLC 56539 b
(c) In order to overcome the presumption of
inadmissibility of evidence of defendant's creative or
artistic expression, the proffering party must affirmatively
prove by clear and convincing evidence:
(1) literal, rather than figurative or fictional,
meaning and, where the work is derivative, that the
defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the
work as the defendant's own thought or statement;
(2) a strong factual nexus indicating that the
creative or artistic expression refers to the specific
facts of the crime alleged;
(3) relevance to an issue of fact that is disputed;
and
(4) distinct probative value not provided by other
admissible evidence.
(d) If the court admits creative or artistic expression as
criminal evidence, the court has a duty to apply careful
redactions, provide limiting instructions, and consider the
least prejudicial means of presenting the creative or artistic
expression to the fact finder.