Bill Text: IL HB4768 | 2023-2024 | 103rd General Assembly | Chaptered


Bill Title: Creates the Landlord Retaliation Act. Declares that it is against the public policy of the State for a landlord to take retaliatory action against a tenant. Prohibits a landlord from knowingly terminating a tenancy, increasing rent, decreasing services, bringing or threatening to bring a lawsuit against a tenant for possessing or refusing to renew a lease or tenancy because the tenant has in good faith has taken certain actions, including but not limited to (i) complaining of code violations applicable to the premises to the relevant governmental agency responsible for enforcement of a building, housing, health, or similar code; (ii) complaining of a building, housing, health, or similar code violation, or an illegal landlord practice to a community organization or the news media; or (iii) complaining or requesting the landlord to make repairs to the premises as required by a building code, health ordinance, other regulation, or the residential rental agreement. Creates remedies for violation by a landlord including damages, punitive damages, or recovering possession of the premises. Creates an affirmative defense under the Code of Civil Procedure in eviction actions if a landlord violates the Landlord Retaliation Act. Repeals the Retaliatory Eviction Act. Makes other changes.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 22-0)

Status: (Passed) 2024-08-09 - Public Act . . . . . . . . . 103-0831 [HB4768 Detail]

Download: Illinois-2023-HB4768-Chaptered.html

Public Act 103-0831
HB4768 EnrolledLRB103 37572 JRC 67698 b
AN ACT concerning civil law.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the
Landlord Retaliation Act.
Section 5. Prohibition on retaliatory conduct by landlord.
It is declared to be against public policy of the State for a
landlord to take retaliatory action against a tenant. A
landlord may not knowingly terminate a tenancy, increase rent,
decrease services, bring or threaten to bring a lawsuit
against a tenant for possession or refuse to renew a lease or
tenancy because the tenant has in good faith done any of the
following:
(1) complained of code violations applicable to the
premises to the relevant governmental agency, elected
representative, or public official charged with
responsibility for enforcement of a building, housing,
health, or similar code;
(2) complained of a building, housing, health, or
similar code violation or an illegal landlord practice to
a community organization;
(3) sought the assistance of a community organization
to remedy a code violation or illegal landlord practice;
(4) complained or requested the landlord to make
repairs to the premises as required by a building code,
health ordinance, other regulation, or the residential
rental agreement;
(5) organized or become a member of a tenants' union
or similar organization;
(6) testified in any court or administrative
proceeding concerning the condition of the premises; or
(7) exercised any right or remedy provided by law.
Section 10. Remedies for violation of this Act. If the
landlord acts in violation of this Act, the tenant has a
defense in any retaliatory action against the tenant, and a
landlord shall be subject to a civil action for damages and
other appropriate relief, including, but not limited to, the
following remedies:
(1) terminate the rental agreement and, if the rental
agreement is terminated, the landlord shall return all
security and interest recoverable under the Security
Deposit Return Act and all prepaid rent;
(2) recover possession of the premises if the landlord
has dispossessed, threatened to dispossess, or is in the
process of dispossessing; and
(3) recovery of an amount equal to and not more than 2
months' rent or 2 times the damages sustained by the
tenant, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney's
fees.
Section 15. Non-retaliatory actions. An action is not
retaliatory if the landlord can prove a legitimate,
non-retaliatory basis for the action; or the landlord began
the action before the tenant engaged in the protected
activity.
Section 20. Rebuttable presumption. In an action by or
against the tenant, if within one year before the alleged act
of retaliation there is evidence that the retaliation was
against tenant's conduct that is protected under this Act,
that evidence creates a rebuttable presumption that the
landlord's conduct was retaliatory. The presumption does not
arise if the protected tenant activity was initiated after the
alleged act of retaliation.
feedback