Bill Text: MA H1519 | 2009-2010 | 186th General Court | Introduced


Bill Title: Liability for malpractice, negligence, error, omission, mistake or unauthorized rendering of professional services by a provider of health care

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2009-01-20 - Public Hearing date 1/28 at 1:00 PM in Hearing Room A1 [H1519 Detail]

Download: Massachusetts-2009-H1519-Introduced.html

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_______________

PRESENTED BY:

Elizabeth A. Malia

_______________

To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
                Court assembled:

                The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the passage of the accompanying bill:

An Act relative to causation in professional liability.

_______________

PETITION OF:

 

Name:

District/Address:

Elizabeth A. Malia

11th Suffolk


 

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

_______________

In the Year Two Thousand and Nine

_______________




An Act relative to causation in professional liability.



                Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

            SECTION 1.  Section 60K of Chapter 231 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2006 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after the end therof the following new section:

Section 60L:

In any action for malpractice, negligence, error, omission, mistake or unauthorized rendering of professional services, against a provider of health care, the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving the following:

 (1) The recognized standard of acceptable professional practice in the profession and the specialty thereof, if any, that the defendant practices in the community in which he practices or in a similar community at the time the alleged injury or wrongful action occurred;

(2)  That the defendant acted with less than or failed to act with ordinary and reasonable care in accordance with such standard; and

(3) As a direct and proximate result of the defendant's negligent act or omission, the plaintiff suffered injuries which would not otherwise have occurred.

(4) The plaintiff was a patient of the defendant and had a professional relationship to the defendant which created a duty of care on the defendant’s part or where the plaintiff is a reasonably identifiable victim of the patient of a defendant psychotherapist to whom the patient communicated a serious threat of physical violence against the plaintiff.

feedback