Bill Text: NY A00636 | 2025-2026 | General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Defines certain terms in standard form contracts as unconscionable.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2025-01-08 - referred to consumer affairs and protection [A00636 Detail]
Download: New_York-2025-A00636-Introduced.html
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 636 2025-2026 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY (Prefiled) January 8, 2025 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. STECK, SEAWRIGHT, WILLIAMS -- read once and referred to the Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to unconscionable terms in standard form contracts The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. The general business law is amended by adding a new section 2 349-h to read as follows: 3 § 349-h. Unconscionable terms in standard form contracts. 1. Find- 4 ings. The inclusion of unconscionable terms in standard form contracts 5 regarding dispute resolution is unfair not only because any resulting 6 dispute resolution proceeding is unfair to the party forced to agree to 7 the unconscionable terms, but also because the unconscionable terms 8 discourage valid claims. Furthermore, when the provisions are chal- 9 lenged, courts may simply strike the unconscionable terms but enforce 10 the remainder of the agreement regarding dispute resolution. As a 11 result, businesses have little incentive not to include these terms. 12 Furthermore, it is unlikely that there is any meeting of the minds over 13 a dispute-resolution agreement that does not include severed unconscion- 14 able terms. 15 2. Definition. For the purposes of this section, "standard form 16 contract" shall mean any contract to which only one of the parties is an 17 individual and that individual does not draft the contract. In order to 18 be a standard form contract, the document constituting the contract need 19 not be a preprinted form nor need it contain language completely identi- 20 cal to any other contract. 21 3. Unconscionable terms. There is a rebuttable presumption that the 22 following contractual terms are substantively unconscionable when 23 included in a standard form contract to which only one of the parties to EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD02175-01-5A. 636 2 1 the contract is an individual and that individual does not draft the 2 contract: 3 (a) a requirement that resolution of legal claims takes place in an 4 inconvenient venue. An "inconvenient venue" is, for purposes of state 5 law claims, a place other than the county where the individual resides 6 or the contract was consummated, and for purposes of federal law claims, 7 a place other than the federal judicial district where the individual 8 resides or the contract was consummated; 9 (b) a waiver of the individual's right to assert claims or seek reme- 10 dies provided by state or federal statute; 11 (c) a waiver of the individual's right to seek punitive damages as 12 provided by law; 13 (d) a requirement that the individual bring an action prior to the 14 expiration of the applicable statute of limitations; 15 (e) a requirement that the individual pay fees and costs to bring a 16 legal claim substantially in excess of the fees and costs that this 17 state's courts require to bring such a state law claim or that federal 18 courts require to bring such a federal law claim; and 19 (f) the contract does not advise the individual that it is a legal 20 document, that the individual should consult with counsel of such indi- 21 vidual's choosing concerning the meaning of its terms, and does not give 22 the individual a reasonable time in which to review the contract with 23 such individual's counsel. 24 4. Relation to common law and the uniform commercial code. In deter- 25 mining whether the terms described in subdivision three of this section 26 are unenforceable, a court shall consider the principles that normally 27 guide courts in this state in determining whether unconscionable terms 28 are enforceable. Additionally, the common law and the uniform commercial 29 code shall guide courts in determining the enforceability of unfair 30 terms not specifically identified in such subdivision. 31 5. Severability. There is a rebuttable presumption that a term in a 32 standard form contract that is found to be unconscionable is not severa- 33 ble from the agreement in which it is situated. In determining whether 34 this presumption has been rebutted courts should consider general state 35 law principles regarding the severability of unenforceable terms. 36 6. Unfair and deceptive act and practice. It is an unfair and decep- 37 tive practice in violation of section three hundred forty-nine of this 38 article to include one of the presumptively-unconscionable terms identi- 39 fied in subdivision three of this section in a standard form contract to 40 which only one of the parties to the contract is an individual and that 41 individual does not draft the contract. Notwithstanding any other 42 provision of law to the contrary, a party who prevails in a claim under 43 this section shall be entitled to one thousand dollars in statutory 44 damages per violation. Additionally, such an action may be maintained by 45 an employee against such employee's employer whether or not the labor 46 law otherwise allows for such claims. 47 § 2. This act shall take effect on the first of January next succeed- 48 ing the date on which it shall have become a law, and shall apply to 49 contracts entered into on or after such date.
