Bill Text: NY A02942 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly | Introduced


Bill Title: Enacts the "community notification and empowerment act"; requires state agencies proposing an opening, expansion or reduction of a state facility in a city with a population of one million or more to submit a written proposal of such to the community planning board, the city planning commission, the city council member representing the area, the state senator and assemblyperson representing the area and the borough president.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-06-03 - reported referred to rules [A02942 Detail]

Download: New_York-2013-A02942-Introduced.html
                           S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
       ________________________________________________________________________
                                         2942
                              2013-2014 Regular Sessions
                                 I N  A S S E M B L Y
                                   January 22, 2013
                                      ___________
       Introduced by M. of A. WRIGHT -- read once and referred to the Committee
         on Cities
       AN  ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to establishing criteria
         for the location of state facilities in cities with  a  population  of
         one million or more
         THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
       BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
    1    Section 1. The executive law is amended by adding a new  article  41-A
    2  to read as follows:
    3                                ARTICLE 41-A
    4                   LOCATION OF STATE FACILITIES IN CITIES
    5                  WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE
    6  SECTION 908-A. SHORT TITLE.
    7          908-B. DEFINITIONS.
    8          908-C. PROCESS  FOR  SITING  STATE  FACILITIES  IN A CITY WITH A
    9                   POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE.
   10          908-D. CRITERIA FOR SITING STATE FACILITIES IN  A  CITY  WITH  A
   11                   POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE.
   12          908-E. STATE RESPONSE.
   13    S  908-A. SHORT TITLE. THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE KNOWN AND MAY BE CITED AS
   14  THE "COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION AND EMPOWERMENT ACT".
   15    S 908-B. DEFINITIONS. WHEN USED IN THIS ARTICLE  THE  FOLLOWING  TERMS
   16  SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   17    1. "STATE FACILITY" SHALL MEAN ANY FACILITY, EXCEPT FACILITIES SUBJECT
   18  TO  REAL  PROPERTY  TAX  EXEMPTION  OR TAX ABATEMENTS UNDER SECTION FOUR
   19  HUNDRED EIGHTY-NINE OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW, THAT MEETS THE FOLLOW-
   20  ING CRITERIA:
   21    (A) THE FACILITY PROVIDES STATE SERVICES; AND
   22    (B) THE FACILITY CONSISTS OF PROPERTY CONTAINING TWENTY-FIVE  THOUSAND
   23  SQUARE FEET OR MORE; AND
   24    (C) (1) THE PROPERTY IS OWNED OR LEASED BY THE STATE; OR
        EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                             [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                  LBD00659-01-3
       A. 2942                             2
    1    (2) THE FACILITY RECEIVES AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT OF ITS ANNUAL REVENUE
    2  FROM THE STATE; AND
    3    (3)  THE  FACILITY TO BE SITED RECEIVES THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
    4  OR MORE FROM THE STATE PER ANNUM.
    5    HOWEVER, THE DEFINITIONS OF "STATE FACILITY" SET FORTH IN THIS  SUBDI-
    6  VISION  SHALL  NOT  INCLUDE  SPACE USED OR TO BE USED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
    7  OFFICES OR DATA PROCESSING OR CLASS ROOM INSTRUCTION OR CHILD  DAY  CARE
    8  CENTERS OR CASE MANAGEMENT OR OUTPATIENT HEALTH CARE SERVICES OR NON-RE-
    9  SIDENTIAL  SOCIAL SERVICES OR FACILITIES SUBJECT PURSUANT TO TAX CREDITS
   10  IN SECTION 42 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OR THE USE  OR  USES  CONTEM-
   11  PLATED  BY  SECTION  41.34  OF THE MENTAL HYGIENE LAW OR THE USE OR USES
   12  CONTEMPLATED BY ARTICLE SIX-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW OR THE  USE  OR
   13  USES  GOVERNED  BY THE LAND USE REVIEW SECTIONS OF THE CHARTER OF A CITY
   14  WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE SO THAT THE PROVISIONS OF  THIS
   15  ARTICLE  SHALL  NOT  BE  DEEMED TO SUPERSEDE OTHERWISE APPLICABLE SITING
   16  PROCEDURES EXISTING BY LAW, RULE OR REGULATION.
   17    2. "EXPANSION OF A STATE FACILITY" SHALL MEAN  THE  ADDITION  OF  REAL
   18  PROPERTY  BY  PURCHASE,  LEASE  OR  OTHERWISE, OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
   19  ENLARGEMENT, WHICH WOULD EXPAND THE LOT AREA OR FLOOR AREA  OF  A  STATE
   20  FACILITY  BY  TWENTY-FIVE  PERCENT  OR MORE AND BY AT LEAST FIVE HUNDRED
   21  SQUARE FEET.
   22    S 908-C. PROCESS FOR SITING STATE FACILITIES IN A CITY  WITH  A  POPU-
   23  LATION  OF  ONE MILLION OR MORE. NOT LESS THAN THIRTY-FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO
   24  SIGNING A LEASE FOR AN OPENING OR THE EXPANSION OF A STATE FACILITY IN A
   25  CITY WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE, OR NOT LESS THAN  FIFTEEN
   26  DAYS  PRIOR  TO  CONSTRUCTION  FOR  THE  OPENING OR EXPANSION OF A STATE
   27  FACILITY IN A CITY WITH A POPULATION OR ONE MILLION OR MORE, THE  ENTITY
   28  PROPOSING  SUCH  SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN NOTICE, NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES,
   29  REGARDING SUCH PROPOSED ACTION, CONSIDERING AND SETTING FORTH THE AVAIL-
   30  ABILITY OF OTHER LOCATIONS FOR SUCH FACILITY  TO  THE  COMMUNITY  BOARD,
   31  THE  CITY  PLANNING COMMISSION, THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBER REPRESENTING THE
   32  AREA WITHIN WHICH THE FACILITY IS PROPOSED TO BE OPENED OR EXPANDED, THE
   33  PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGH WITHIN WHICH THE FACILITY  IS  PROPOSED  TO  BE
   34  OPENED  OR EXPANDED, AND THE STATE SENATOR AND ASSEMBLYPERSON REPRESENT-
   35  ING THE AREA WITHIN WHICH THE FACILITY  IS  PROPOSED  TO  BE  OPENED  OR
   36  EXPANDED.    FURTHER,  SUCH  WRITTEN  NOTICE SHALL SET FORTH INFORMATION
   37  AVAILABLE TO THE STATE AGENCY OR STATE FACILITY THAT DESCRIBES: (A)  THE
   38  PURPOSE  OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY; (B) THE LOCATIONS BEING CONSIDERED AS
   39  SITES FOR THE FACILITY; (C) THE SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED AT THE FACILITY;
   40  (D) THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION OF THE FACILITY;  (E)  THE  EXPECTED
   41  IMPACT  OF SUCH FACILITY ON THE AREA SURROUNDING THE FACILITY, INCLUDING
   42  BUT NOT LIMITED TO  NOISE,  TRAFFIC,  PARKING,  AND  NUMBER  OF  PERSONS
   43  EXPECTED  TO BE EMPLOYED OR HOUSED AT THE SITE OF THE FACILITY; AND SUCH
   44  OTHER INFORMATION MAY INCLUDE FOR THE  CITY  PLANNING  COMMISSION,  CITY
   45  COUNCIL  MEMBER,  STATE  SENATOR, ASSEMBLYPERSON, BOROUGH PRESIDENT, AND
   46  COMMUNITY BOARD TO CONDUCT A REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY PURSUANT TO
   47  THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION NINE HUNDRED EIGHT-D OF THIS  ARTICLE.
   48  SUCH  COMMUNITY  BOARD,  CITY  COUNCIL MEMBER, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION,
   49  STATE SENATOR, ASSEMBLYPERSON, AND BOROUGH PRESIDENT MAY REVIEW AND MAKE
   50  RECOMMENDATIONS NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES, BASED UPON SUCH WRITTEN  NOTICE
   51  BY  THE  ENTITY PROPOSING THE OPENING, EXPANSION OR REDUCTION OF A STATE
   52  FACILITY WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIPT THEREOF.   ANY  RECOMMENDATION  BY
   53  SUCH  COMMUNITY  BOARD, CITY COUNCIL MEMBER, STATE SENATOR, ASSEMBLYPER-
   54  SON, BOROUGH PRESIDENT, OR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF SUCH CITY MAY  BE
   55  SUBMITTED TO THE ENTITY PROPOSING THE OPENING, EXPANSION OR REDUCTION OF
   56  A STATE FACILITY.
       A. 2942                             3
    1    S  908-D.  CRITERIA FOR SITING STATE FACILITIES IN A CITY WITH A POPU-
    2  LATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE. IN ADDITION TO ANY CRITERIA  REQUIRED  OR
    3  PERMITTED  BY  ANY OTHER LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
    4  MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE COMMUNITY BOARD,  CITY  COUNCIL  MEMBER,  STATE
    5  SENATOR, ASSEMBLYPERSON, BOROUGH PRESIDENT, AND CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
    6  IN REVIEWING NOTICES FOR THE SITING OF A STATE FACILITY IN A CITY WITH A
    7  POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE:
    8    1. THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY WITH EXISTING FACILITIES
    9  AND PROGRAMS, BOTH STATE AND NON-STATE, IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE
   10  PROPOSED SITE;
   11    2.  THE  EXTENT  TO  WHICH  NEIGHBORHOOD  CHARACTER WOULD BE ADVERSELY
   12  AFFECTED BY A CONCENTRATION OF STATE AND/OR NON-STATE FACILITIES;
   13    3. THE SUITABILITY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE COST-EFFECTIVE  DELIVERY  OF
   14  THE  INTENDED  SERVICES,  INCLUDING THE CONVENIENCE OF THE PROPOSED SITE
   15  FOR THE POPULATION INTENDED TO BE SERVED BY THE PROPOSED SERVICE; AND
   16    4. CONSISTENCY WITH ANY LAND USE PLANS ADOPTED FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
   17    S 908-E. STATE RESPONSE. IF THE ENTITY PROPOSING THE OPENING OR EXPAN-
   18  SION OF A STATE FACILITY IN A CITY WITH A POPULATION OF ONE  MILLION  OR
   19  MORE  CHOOSES  TO  ACT  IN  A MANNER INCONSISTENT WITH ANY OR ALL OF THE
   20  RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN PURSUANT TO SECTION NINE HUNDRED EIGHT-C  OF  THIS
   21  ARTICLE BY ANY OF THE PERSONS OR ENTITIES AUTHORIZED TO MAKE RECOMMENDA-
   22  TIONS BY SUCH SECTION, SUCH ENTITY PROPOSING THE OPENING OR EXPANSION OF
   23  A  STATE  FACILITY  SHALL ISSUE A WRITTEN REPORT EXPLAINING SUCH ACTIONS
   24  AND THE REASONS WHY THE ACTIONS WERE TAKEN INSTEAD OF THE ACTIONS RECOM-
   25  MENDED PURSUANT TO SECTION NINE HUNDRED EIGHT-C OF THIS ARTICLE.
   26    S 2. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after
   27  it shall have become a law.
feedback