Bill Text: TX HB1170 | 2025-2026 | 89th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to analysis and mitigation of transportation security threats in this state.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2024-11-12 - Filed [HB1170 Detail]
Download: Texas-2025-HB1170-Introduced.html
89R190 SCP-D | ||
By: Raymond | H.B. No. 1170 |
|
||
|
||
relating to analysis and mitigation of transportation security | ||
threats in this state. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: | ||
(1) "Commission" means the Public Safety Commission. | ||
(2) "Department" means the Department of Public Safety | ||
of the State of Texas. | ||
(3) "Director" means the public safety director. | ||
(4) "Division" means the Intelligence and | ||
Counterterrorism division of the department. | ||
SECTION 2. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY THREAT ANALYSIS. (a) | ||
The division shall conduct an analysis of emerging and potential | ||
future threats to transportation security in this state. The | ||
analysis must include threats posed by the following: | ||
(1) evolving tactics by terrorist organizations that | ||
may pose a catastrophic risk to an aviation or surface | ||
transportation entity; | ||
(2) explosive devices or attacks involving the use of | ||
explosives that may cause catastrophic damage to an aviation or | ||
surface transportation system; | ||
(3) the release of chemical or biological agents in | ||
either aviation or surface transportation systems; | ||
(4) cyberthreat actors seeking to undermine | ||
confidence in transportation systems or cause service disruptions | ||
that jeopardize transportation security; | ||
(5) unmanned aerial systems with the capability of | ||
inflicting harm on transportation targets; | ||
(6) individuals or groups seeking to attack soft | ||
targets, public areas, or crowded spaces of transportation systems, | ||
including attacks against transportation security personnel; | ||
(7) foreign actors seeking to exploit vulnerabilities | ||
posed by inconsistent or inadequate security screening protocols at | ||
last point of departure airports with direct flights to this state; | ||
(8) information-sharing challenges within state | ||
government and between state government and private and | ||
governmental entities; and | ||
(9) growth in passenger volume in both the aviation | ||
and surface transportation sectors in this state. | ||
(b) In conducting the analysis required under Subsection | ||
(a) of this section, the division shall engage transportation | ||
stakeholders and account for security concerns of transportation | ||
operators by: | ||
(1) convening at least three industry day events for | ||
stakeholders to hear from relevant public and private sector | ||
security partners and provide feedback on emerging threats | ||
identified by the stakeholders; | ||
(2) developing strategies to solicit consistent | ||
feedback from stakeholders across all modes of transportation and | ||
providing consistent responses to stakeholder concerns; | ||
(3) improving the quality, timeliness, and relevancy | ||
of information-sharing products disseminated by the division to | ||
stakeholders, including classified information-sharing products; | ||
(4) coordinating security incident response and | ||
communications drills, including tabletop exercises, to improve | ||
incident preparedness and response capabilities across | ||
transportation modes and among transportation systems; | ||
(5) encouraging regular communication between | ||
governmental entities responsible for transportation security and | ||
stakeholders; and | ||
(6) establishing regular opportunities for senior | ||
department leadership to engage with stakeholders regarding | ||
changes in the threat environment and ways the department can offer | ||
security support to address those changes. | ||
(c) Not later than June 1, 2026, the division shall submit | ||
the analysis required under Subsection (a) of this section to the | ||
commission and director. | ||
SECTION 3. MITIGATION. Not later than October 1, 2026, the | ||
director shall: | ||
(1) develop, as appropriate, a threat mitigation | ||
strategy for each of the threats examined in the analysis; and | ||
(2) assign appropriate department resources to | ||
address those threats based on the calculated risk or provide | ||
recommendations to the appropriate governmental entity responsible | ||
for addressing those threats. | ||
SECTION 4. REPORT. (a) Not later than November 1, 2026, the | ||
director shall: | ||
(1) prepare a report on the results of the analysis | ||
required under Section 2 of this Act and relevant mitigation | ||
strategies developed in accordance with Section 3 of this Act; and | ||
(2) notify each standing committee of the legislature | ||
with primary jurisdiction over transportation of the completion of | ||
the report and inform those committees of any relevant findings in | ||
the report as the director determines necessary. | ||
(b) Except as provided by Subsection (a) of this section, | ||
the information in the report is confidential and not subject to | ||
disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code. | ||
SECTION 5. EXPIRATION. This Act expires December 31, 2026. | ||
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act takes effect September | ||
1, 2025. |