Bill Text: TX HB180 | 2017-2018 | 85th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to the review of groundwater conservation districts by the state auditor.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2017-05-03 - Referred to Agriculture, Water, & Rural Affairs [HB180 Detail]
Download: Texas-2017-HB180-Introduced.html
85R217 TSR-F | ||
By: Lucio III | H.B. No. 180 |
|
||
|
||
relating to the review of groundwater conservation districts by the | ||
state auditor. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. Section 35.018(b), Water Code, is amended to | ||
read as follows: | ||
(b) The report must include: | ||
(1) the names and locations of all priority | ||
groundwater management areas and districts created or attempted to | ||
be created on or after November 5, 1985, the effective date of | ||
Chapter 133 (H.B. No. 2), Acts of the 69th Legislature, Regular | ||
Session, 1985; | ||
(2) the authority under which each priority | ||
groundwater management area and district was proposed for creation; | ||
(3) a detailed analysis of each election held to | ||
confirm the creation of a district, including analysis of election | ||
results, possible reasons for the success or failure to confirm the | ||
creation of a district, and the possibility for future voter | ||
approval of districts in areas in which attempts to create | ||
districts failed; | ||
(4) a detailed analysis of the activities of each | ||
district created, including those districts which are implementing | ||
management plans certified under Section 36.1072; | ||
(5) a report on [ |
||
|
||
(6) recommendations for changes in this chapter and | ||
Chapter 36 that will facilitate the creation of priority | ||
groundwater management areas and the creation and operation of | ||
districts; | ||
(7) a report on educational efforts in newly | ||
designated priority groundwater management areas; and | ||
(8) any other information and recommendations that the | ||
commission considers relevant. | ||
SECTION 2. Section 36.061(b), Water Code, is amended to | ||
read as follows: | ||
(b) The state auditor may conduct a financial audit [ |
||
|
||
audit is necessary. | ||
SECTION 3. Section 36.1072(f), Water Code, is amended to | ||
read as follows: | ||
(f) If the executive administrator does not approve the | ||
district's management plan, the executive administrator shall | ||
provide to the district, in writing, the reasons for the | ||
action. Not later than the 180th day after the date a district | ||
receives notice that its management plan has not been approved, the | ||
district may submit a revised management plan for review and | ||
approval. The executive administrator's decision may be appealed | ||
to the development board. If the development board decides not to | ||
approve the district's management plan on appeal, the district may | ||
request that the conflict be mediated. The district and the board | ||
may seek the assistance of the Center for Public Policy Dispute | ||
Resolution at The University of Texas School of Law or an | ||
alternative dispute resolution system established under Chapter | ||
152, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, in obtaining a qualified | ||
impartial third party to mediate the conflict. The cost of the | ||
mediation services must be specified in the agreement between the | ||
parties and the Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolution or the | ||
alternative dispute resolution system. If the parties do not | ||
resolve the conflict through mediation, the decision of the | ||
development board not to approve the district's management plan may | ||
be appealed to a district court in Travis County. Costs for the | ||
appeal shall be set by the court hearing the appeal. An appeal | ||
under this subsection is by trial de novo. The commission shall | ||
not take enforcement action against a district under Subchapter I | ||
until the latest of the expiration of the 180-day period, the date | ||
the development board has taken final action withholding approval | ||
of a revised management plan, the date the mediation is completed, | ||
or the date a final judgment upholding the board's decision is | ||
entered by a district court. An enforcement action may not be | ||
taken against a district by the commission [ |
||
under Subchapter I because the district's management plan and the | ||
approved regional water plan are in conflict while the parties are | ||
attempting to resolve the conflict before the development board, in | ||
mediation, or in court. Rules of the district continue in full | ||
force and effect until all appeals under this subsection have been | ||
exhausted and the final judgment is adverse to the district. | ||
SECTION 4. Section 36.303(a), Water Code, is amended to | ||
read as follows: | ||
(a) If Section 36.301 or [ |
||
applies, the commission, after notice and hearing in accordance | ||
with Chapter 2001, Government Code, shall take action the | ||
commission considers appropriate, including: | ||
(1) issuing an order requiring the district to take | ||
certain actions or to refrain from taking certain actions; | ||
(2) dissolving the board in accordance with Sections | ||
36.305 and 36.307 and calling an election for the purpose of | ||
electing a new board; | ||
(3) requesting the attorney general to bring suit for | ||
the appointment of a receiver to collect the assets and carry on the | ||
business of the groundwater conservation district; or | ||
(4) dissolving the district in accordance with | ||
Sections 36.304, 36.305, and 36.308. | ||
SECTION 5. Section 36.302, Water Code, is repealed. | ||
SECTION 6. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives | ||
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as | ||
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this | ||
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this | ||
Act takes effect September 1, 2017. |