Bill Text: TX HB3821 | 2015-2016 | 84th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to the procedure for action by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on an application for a water right.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2015-03-23 - Referred to Natural Resources [HB3821 Detail]
Download: Texas-2015-HB3821-Introduced.html
By: Ashby | H.B. No. 3821 |
|
||
|
||
re | ||
lating to the procedure for action by the Texas Commission on | ||
Environmental Quality on an application for a water right. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. Section 11.129, Water Code, is amended to read as | ||
follows: | ||
Sec. 11.129. REVIEW OF APPLICATION[ |
||
this section: | ||
(1) "Administratively complete" means an application | ||
includes the information and fees required under Sections 11.124, | ||
11.125, 11.1271, and 11.128 and, if applicable, Sections 11.126, | ||
11.127, and 11.1272. | ||
(2) "Technical review" means the part of the process | ||
of reviewing an application after the executive director has | ||
determined the application is administratively complete in which | ||
technical material is analyzed and reviewed in order to prepare a | ||
draft permit and draft notice. | ||
(b) Not later than the 30th working day after the date the | ||
executive director receives an application, the executive director | ||
shall review the application and provide to the applicant: | ||
(1) written notice that the application is | ||
administratively complete; or | ||
(2) a written request for information that describes | ||
in detail the information that the applicant must provide in order | ||
for the application to be considered administratively complete. | ||
(c) Not later than the 30th day after the date an applicant | ||
receives a request under Subsection (b)(2), the applicant must | ||
submit a response to the request. Not later than the 30th working | ||
day after the date the executive director receives a timely | ||
response, the executive director shall review the response and | ||
provide to the applicant: | ||
(1) written notice that the application is | ||
administratively complete; or | ||
(2) a written request for information that describes | ||
in detail the information that the applicant must provide in order | ||
for the application to be considered administratively complete. | ||
(d) The applicant may request an extension of the time to | ||
submit a response to a request under Subsection (b)(2) or (c)(2). | ||
The executive director shall grant the request if the applicant | ||
demonstrates good cause for the extension. An extension under this | ||
subsection extends the deadline provided by Subsection (e) by the | ||
same amount of time as the amount of the extension. | ||
(e) Not later than the 180th day after the date the | ||
executive director receives the application, the executive | ||
director shall: | ||
(1) provide the applicant written notice that the | ||
application is administratively complete; or | ||
(2) return the application and the entire filing fee | ||
to the applicant and provide the applicant with a list of the | ||
deficiencies in the application. | ||
(f) The applicant is entitled to appeal the return of the | ||
application and dispute an application deficiency in a hearing | ||
before the commission. The commission shall expedite an | ||
applicant's appeal of such a decision, review the application and | ||
related documents, rule on the issues presented at the hearing, and | ||
issue an order: | ||
(1) directing the executive director to return the | ||
application to the applicant; | ||
(2) requesting additional information as required by | ||
the executive director to render the application administratively | ||
complete; or | ||
(3) declaring that the application is | ||
administratively complete and scheduling the technical review of | ||
the application. | ||
(g) If the commission requests additional information from | ||
the applicant under Subsection (f)(2), the applicant must provide | ||
the information to the commission not later than the 30th day after | ||
the date the commission issues the request. The commission shall | ||
review the material and issue an order described by Subsection | ||
(f)(1) or (3), as applicable. | ||
(h) Once the executive director determines that an | ||
application is administratively complete: | ||
(1) the commission may not revoke the determination | ||
that the application is administratively complete; | ||
(2) the executive director may request additional | ||
information from the applicant only if the information is necessary | ||
to clarify, modify, or supplement previously submitted | ||
information; and | ||
(3) a request for additional information does not | ||
render the application incomplete. | ||
(i) After the executive director or the commission | ||
determines that the application is administratively complete, the | ||
executive director shall conduct a technical review of the | ||
application. As part of the review, the executive director shall | ||
determine whether the applicable water conservation, drought | ||
contingency, and water management plans under Sections 11.1271, | ||
11.1272, and 11.1273 are adequate. | ||
(j) Not later than the 180th day after the date on which the | ||
technical review begins, the executive director shall provide the | ||
applicant with: | ||
(1) written notice that the technical review is | ||
complete, a draft permit, a draft notice, and technical memoranda | ||
associated with the application; or | ||
(2) a written request for technical information as | ||
determined by the executive director to be necessary for the | ||
completion of the technical review. | ||
(k) With notice to the applicant, the executive director may | ||
extend the deadline provided by Subsection (j) for a period of 30 | ||
days. The executive director may not extend the deadline more than | ||
three times. | ||
(l) Not later than the 60th day after the date the applicant | ||
receives a request under Subsection (j)(2), the applicant must | ||
provide the requested information to the executive director. | ||
(m) The applicant may request an extension of the time to | ||
submit a response to a request under Subsection (j)(2). The | ||
executive director shall grant the request if the applicant | ||
demonstrates good cause for the extension. An extension under this | ||
subsection extends the deadline provided by Subsection (o) by the | ||
same amount of time as the amount of the extension. | ||
(n) Not later than the 60th day after the date the executive | ||
director receives a timely response to a request under Subsection | ||
(j)(2), the executive director shall review the response and | ||
provide the applicant with: | ||
(1) written notice that the technical review is | ||
complete, a draft permit, a draft notice, and technical memoranda | ||
associated with the application; or | ||
(2) written notice that the response to the request | ||
for technical information is deficient. | ||
(o) If the executive director provides notice under | ||
Subsection (n)(2), the executive director and the applicant must | ||
collaborate in a good faith effort to resolve the deficiency. Not | ||
later than the 180th day after the date the executive director | ||
provides such notice, the executive director shall: | ||
(1) provide the applicant with written notice that the | ||
technical review is complete, a draft permit, a draft notice, and | ||
technical memoranda associated with the application; or | ||
(2) return the application and the use fee and the | ||
unused portion of the notice fee as prescribed by commission rule to | ||
the applicant and provide the applicant with a list of the | ||
deficiencies with the application. | ||
(p) The applicant is entitled to appeal the return of the | ||
application and dispute an application deficiency in a hearing | ||
before the commission. The commission shall expedite an | ||
applicant's appeal of such a decision, review the application and | ||
related documents, rule on the issues presented at the hearing, and | ||
issue an order: | ||
(1) directing the executive director to return the | ||
application to the applicant; | ||
(2) requesting additional information as required by | ||
the commission; or | ||
(3) requiring the executive director to prepare the | ||
draft permit, draft notice, and technical memoranda associated with | ||
the application and written notice that the technical review is | ||
complete. | ||
(q) If the commission requests additional information from | ||
the applicant under Subsection (p)(2), the applicant must provide | ||
the information to the commission not later than the 30th day after | ||
the date the commission issues the request. The commission shall | ||
review the material and issue an order described by Subsection | ||
(p)(1) or (3), as applicable. | ||
(r) The applicant may request an extension of the time to | ||
submit a response to a request under Subsection (p)(2). The | ||
commission shall grant the request if the applicant demonstrates | ||
good cause for the extension. An extension under this subsection | ||
extends the deadline provided by Subsection (q) by the same amount | ||
of time as the amount of the extension. | ||
(s) Not later than the 14th day after the date the applicant | ||
receives the draft permit, draft notice, and technical memoranda | ||
associated with the application, the applicant must provide the | ||
executive director with: | ||
(1) the applicant's comments on the draft permit, | ||
draft notice, and technical memoranda; or | ||
(2) a statement that the applicant has no comment on | ||
the draft permit, draft notice, or technical memoranda. | ||
(t) The applicant may request an extension of the time to | ||
submit comments under Subsection (s)(1). The commission shall | ||
grant the request if the applicant demonstrates good cause for the | ||
extension. An extension under this subsection extends the deadline | ||
provided by Subsection (s) by the same amount of time as the amount | ||
of the extension. | ||
(u) The executive director shall file the draft permit, | ||
draft notice, and technical memoranda associated with the | ||
application with the chief clerk of the commission: | ||
(1) not later than the 14th day after the date the | ||
executive director receives comments under Subsection (s)(1), | ||
during which time the executive director and the applicant must | ||
collaborate to address the comments; or | ||
(2) immediately on receipt of a statement described by | ||
Subsection (s)(2). | ||
(v) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, if | ||
the executive director makes a written determination that notice is | ||
not required for an application, the executive director shall grant | ||
or deny the permit for which the application is filed not later than | ||
the 300th day after the date the executive director receives the | ||
application. This period shall be extended by the same amount of | ||
time as the amount of any extension of time granted to the applicant | ||
for the provision of information [ |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
SECTION 2. Subchapter D, Chapter 11, Water Code, is amended | ||
by adding Section 11.1291 to read as follows: | ||
Sec. 11.1291. TECHNICAL REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS | ||
(a) Within 30 days of the written request of an applicant, | ||
and following the declaration that an application is | ||
administratively complete, the executive director may delegate | ||
responsibilities for the technical review of the application to a | ||
third-party contractor who will: | ||
(1) follow the direction of the executive director in | ||
conducting the technical review of the application and preparing | ||
all technical memoranda required by the executive director to | ||
reflect the analyses and conclusions developed as part of the | ||
technical review; and | ||
(2) be responsible for successfully completing the | ||
technical review on behalf of the executive director. | ||
(b) The executive director shall evaluate the principals | ||
and all subcontractors to be involved in a technical review | ||
conducted under this section for their experience in the areas to be | ||
addressed during and as part of the technical review, and shall | ||
secure the applicant's written consent before technical review may | ||
commence if such review will not be conducted by the executive | ||
director. | ||
(c) If the executive director chooses to utilize a | ||
third-party contractor to complete the technical review of an | ||
application, the executive director shall: | ||
(1) take all necessary measures to ensure that the | ||
third-party contractor, its principals, and its subcontractors | ||
have no financial or economic interest in the outcome of the | ||
application that is to be the subject of the technical review; and | ||
(2) provide the applicant with a written statement of | ||
the basis for the executive director's selection of the third-party | ||
contractor for the technical review, including a description of the | ||
third-party contractor's demonstrated competency in the fields of | ||
expertise required for the technical review. | ||
(d) The technical review of an application under this | ||
section shall be completed so that the executive director issues a | ||
draft permit or a draft permit amendment and associated technical | ||
memoranda within 180 days following the date the executive director | ||
determines that the applicant may complete the technical review or | ||
the applicant contracts with the third-party contractor. | ||
(e) The period of technical review provided in this | ||
subsection is exclusive of the time provided for an applicant's | ||
responses to requests for information. | ||
(f) For good cause demonstrated to the executive director, | ||
an applicant may be granted no more than 90 days to respond to any | ||
request for information. | ||
(g) If an applicant requires additional time to respond to a | ||
request for information during technical review beyond 30 days from | ||
the date of applicant's receipt of the request, the time provided to | ||
the executive director in this subsection to issue a draft permit or | ||
draft permit amendment and associated technical memoranda shall be | ||
extended by the number of days beyond 30 days that the applicant | ||
requires to respond to the request. | ||
(h) Upon receipt of the applicant's consent to the use of a | ||
third-party contractor to conduct the technical review of an | ||
application, the executive director shall require the applicant to: | ||
(1) enter into a contract with the third-party | ||
contractor that is consistent with this section and that expresses | ||
the scope of work to be undertaken by the third-party contractor | ||
during the technical review; and | ||
(2) pay the third-party contractor for all services | ||
rendered under the contract as and when they are performed. | ||
(i) If the applicant does not consent to the use of the | ||
third-party contractor under subsection (b), then the application | ||
shall be reviewed by the executive director. | ||
SECTION 3. Section 11.133, Water Code, is amended to read as | ||
follows: | ||
Sec. 11.133. HEARING. (a) At the time and place stated in | ||
the notice, the commission shall hold a hearing on the application. | ||
Any person may appear at the hearing in person or by attorney or may | ||
enter an [ |
||
present objection to the issuance of the permit. The commission may | ||
receive evidence, orally or by affidavit, in support of or in | ||
opposition to the issuance of the permit, and it may hear arguments. | ||
(b) The commission may not refer an application filed under | ||
this chapter to the State Office of Administrative Hearings for | ||
consideration unless the commission first determines that: | ||
(1) an issue relating to the commission's jurisdiction | ||
has been specifically identified in a timely filed request for a | ||
contested case hearing on the application; | ||
(2) such request includes supporting documentation | ||
and evidence reflecting the interest the requestor asserts is | ||
justiciable by the commission at the time of the request; and | ||
(3) the identified issue is one the commission has the | ||
authority to address under the statutes that govern the | ||
commission's consideration of the application. | ||
(c) If the commission grants a request for a contested case | ||
hearing on an application submitted under this chapter, the | ||
commission shall: | ||
(1) issue an order identifying the number and scope of | ||
issues to be referred to the State Office of Administrative | ||
Hearings for a hearing; and | ||
(2) specify the maximum expected duration of the | ||
hearing, which may not exceed a period of 270 days from the date of | ||
the issuance of the commission's order under this subsection until | ||
the issuance of the proposal for decision. | ||
(d) If the commission refers an issue regarding an | ||
application to the State Office of Administrative Hearings for a | ||
contested case hearing, the administrative law judge who conducts | ||
the hearing may not grant party status to a person who failed to | ||
timely seek party status from the commission before the issue was | ||
referred or to any person who was considered by the commission but | ||
was not determined to be a person affected by the commission's | ||
action on the application. | ||
(e) In the event of a conflict between this section and any | ||
other law, this section prevails. | ||
SECTION 4. Subchapter D, Chapter 11, Water Code, is amended | ||
by adding Section 11.1331 to read as follows: | ||
Sec. 11.1331. PARTICIPATION BY PUBLIC INTEREST COUNSEL. | ||
(a) The public interest counsel may be named a party to a hearing on | ||
an application submitted under this chapter only if: | ||
(1) during the period the commission may receive and | ||
consider requests for a contested case hearing on the application, | ||
the office of public interest counsel files with the commission a | ||
description of each public interest as established by Section 5.276 | ||
that the office of public interest counsel believes: | ||
(A) is affected by the application; and | ||
(B) has not been adequately addressed by the | ||
executive director or the applicant during technical review; | ||
(2) the commission in its discretion determines that | ||
the office of public interest counsel has described a public | ||
interest affected by the application that warrants participation by | ||
the public interest counsel as a party, and that will not be | ||
adequately addressed by any other party to the contested case | ||
hearing; and | ||
(3) the commission includes in an order issued | ||
pursuant to section 11.133(c) one or more specified public interest | ||
issues described by the public interest counsel pursuant to | ||
subsection (a). | ||
(b) If the commission names the office of public interest | ||
counsel as a party to a contested case hearing on an application | ||
submitted under this chapter, the public interest counsel's | ||
participation shall be limited to examining only those public | ||
interest issues identified in the commission's order issued under | ||
section 11.133(c). | ||
(c) The office of public interest counsel may not: | ||
(1) submit responses to any requests for a contested | ||
case hearing on an application submitted under this chapter; or | ||
(2) provide assistance to any party to a contested | ||
case hearing. | ||
(d) A filing made by the public interest counsel under | ||
subsection (a) of this section is insufficient to refer any issue of | ||
an application to the State Office of Administrative Hearings for a | ||
contested case hearing. | ||
(e) Subsection (d) does not limit any authority of the | ||
commission or executive director provided by other law to refer an | ||
application to the State Office of Administrative Hearings for a | ||
contested case hearing. | ||
SECTION 5. (a) As soon as practicable after the effective | ||
date of this Act, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||
shall adopt rules to implement the changes in law made by this Act. | ||
(b) The changes made to Section 11.133 and 11.1331 shall be | ||
effective for any notice of an application considered by the | ||
commission following the effective date of this Act. The changes | ||
made to Sections 11.129 and 11.1291 shall be effective to any | ||
application filed after the effective date of this Act. | ||
(c) On notice to the applicant, beginning on the effective | ||
date of the rules adopted under Subsection (a) of this section, the | ||
executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||
may extend the period for technical review of an application for a | ||
new or amended water right under Section 11.129, Water Code, as | ||
amended by this Act, by a period not to exceed 18 months from the | ||
date the rules take effect if: | ||
(1) on the effective date of the rules there are | ||
applications for new or amended water rights pending before the | ||
commission the technical review of which has not been completed; | ||
and | ||
(2) the applications described by Subdivision (1) | ||
affect the same river basin as the application for which the | ||
technical review period is extended. | ||
(d) During an extension under Subsection (c) of this | ||
section, the executive director shall take all practicable measures | ||
to substantially meet all other applicable deadlines in Section | ||
11.129, Water Code, as amended by this Act, related to the technical | ||
review of an application. | ||
SECTION 6. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives | ||
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as | ||
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this | ||
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this | ||
Act takes effect September 1, 2015. |