Bill Text: TX HB498 | 2017-2018 | 85th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child relationship in this state.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2017-02-16 - Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence [HB498 Detail]
Download: Texas-2017-HB498-Introduced.html
85R3424 KSD-F | ||
By: Fallon | H.B. No. 498 |
|
||
|
||
relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum | ||
selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for | ||
dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child | ||
relationship in this state. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. Subtitle A, Title 1, Family Code, is amended by | ||
adding Chapter 1A to read as follows: | ||
CHAPTER 1A. APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAWS; SELECTION OF FOREIGN | ||
FORUM | ||
Sec. 1A.001. DEFINITIONS; PUBLIC POLICY. (a) In this | ||
chapter: | ||
(1) "Foreign court" means any court, tribunal, | ||
administrative adjudicator, or arbitrator outside of the states and | ||
territories of the United States. | ||
(2) "Foreign judgment" means a judgment issued by a | ||
foreign court. | ||
(3) "Foreign law" means a law, rule, or legal code of a | ||
jurisdiction outside of the states and territories of the United | ||
States. | ||
(b) For purposes of this chapter, the application of a law | ||
is contrary to the public policy of this state if application of the | ||
law would: | ||
(1) violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the | ||
United States Constitution; | ||
(2) violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the | ||
constitution of this state; | ||
(3) violate good morals or natural justice; or | ||
(4) be prejudicial to the general interests of the | ||
citizens of this state. | ||
Sec. 1A.002. PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN | ||
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS. A court of this state may not enforce a foreign | ||
judgment involving the marriage relationship if the court finds | ||
that the foreign court's application of foreign law to the dispute | ||
was contrary to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 1A.003. PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN | ||
ARBITRATION DECISIONS. A court of this state may not enforce an | ||
arbitration decision involving the marriage relationship if the | ||
court finds that the arbitrator's application of foreign law to the | ||
dispute was contrary to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 1A.004. CONFLICTS OF LAW. A court of this state may | ||
not apply foreign law to a dispute involving the marriage | ||
relationship if the court finds that application of the foreign law | ||
to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 1A.005. CHOICE OF FOREIGN LAW OR FORUM IN CONTRACT. | ||
(a) A contract provision involving the marriage relationship | ||
providing that a foreign law is to govern a dispute arising under | ||
the contract is void to the extent that the application of the | ||
foreign law to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of | ||
this state. | ||
(b) A contract provision involving the marriage | ||
relationship providing that the forum to resolve a dispute arising | ||
under the contract is located outside the states and territories of | ||
the United States is void if the foreign law that would be applied | ||
to the dispute in that forum would, as applied, be contrary to the | ||
public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 1A.006. FORUM NON CONVENIENS. A court of this state | ||
that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit affecting the marriage | ||
relationship may not decline jurisdiction because a foreign court | ||
is a more convenient forum if the foreign court would apply foreign | ||
law to the dispute that, as applied, would be contrary to the public | ||
policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 1A.007. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER. This chapter does not | ||
apply to a corporation or other legal entity that contracts to | ||
subject the entity to foreign law. | ||
SECTION 2. Subtitle A, Title 5, Family Code, is amended by | ||
adding Chapter 112 to read as follows: | ||
CHAPTER 112. APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAWS; SELECTION OF FOREIGN | ||
FORUM | ||
Sec. 112.001. DEFINITIONS; PUBLIC POLICY. (a) In this | ||
chapter: | ||
(1) "Foreign court" means any court, tribunal, | ||
administrative adjudicator, or arbitrator outside of the states and | ||
territories of the United States. | ||
(2) "Foreign judgment" means a judgment issued by a | ||
foreign court. | ||
(3) "Foreign law" means a law, rule, or legal code of a | ||
jurisdiction outside of the states and territories of the United | ||
States. | ||
(b) For purposes of this chapter, the application of a law | ||
is contrary to the public policy of this state if application of the | ||
law would: | ||
(1) violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the | ||
United States Constitution; | ||
(2) violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the | ||
constitution of this state; | ||
(3) violate good morals or natural justice; or | ||
(4) be prejudicial to the general interests of the | ||
citizens of this state. | ||
Sec. 112.002. PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN | ||
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS. A court of this state may not enforce a foreign | ||
judgment involving the parent-child relationship if the court finds | ||
that the foreign court's application of foreign law to the dispute | ||
was contrary to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 112.003. PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN | ||
ARBITRATION DECISIONS. A court of this state may not enforce an | ||
arbitration decision involving the parent-child relationship if | ||
the court finds that the arbitrator's application of foreign law to | ||
the dispute was contrary to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 112.004. CONFLICTS OF LAW. A court of this state may | ||
not apply foreign law to a dispute involving the parent-child | ||
relationship if the court finds that application of the foreign law | ||
to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 112.005. CHOICE OF FOREIGN LAW OR FORUM IN CONTRACT. | ||
(a) A contract provision involving the parent-child relationship | ||
providing that a foreign law is to govern a dispute arising under | ||
the contract is void to the extent that the application of the | ||
foreign law to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of | ||
this state. | ||
(b) A contract provision involving the parent-child | ||
relationship providing that the forum to resolve a dispute arising | ||
under the contract is located outside the states and territories of | ||
the United States is void if the foreign law that would be applied | ||
to the dispute in that forum would, as applied, be contrary to the | ||
public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 112.006. FORUM NON CONVENIENS. A court of this state | ||
that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit affecting the | ||
parent-child relationship may not decline jurisdiction because a | ||
foreign court is a more convenient forum if the foreign court would | ||
apply foreign law to the dispute that, as applied, would be contrary | ||
to the public policy of this state. | ||
Sec. 112.007. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER. This chapter does | ||
not apply to a corporation or other legal entity that contracts to | ||
subject the entity to foreign law. | ||
SECTION 3. Sections 1A.005 and 112.005, Family Code, as | ||
added by this Act, apply only to a contract entered into on or after | ||
the effective date of this Act. A contract entered into before the | ||
effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect | ||
immediately before that date, and that law is continued in effect | ||
for that purpose. | ||
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2017. |