Bill Text: AZ SB1233 | 2011 | Fiftieth Legislature 1st Regular | Introduced
Bill Title: Peace officers; at will employment
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Passed) 2011-04-19 - Governor Signed [SB1233 Detail]
Download: Arizona-2011-SB1233-Introduced.html
|
REFERENCE TITLE: peace officers; at will employment |
|
State of Arizona Senate Fiftieth Legislature First Regular Session 2011
|
|
SB 1233 |
|
|
|
Introduced by Senator Gray
|
AN ACT
amending section 38‑1104, Arizona Revised Statutes; relating to law enforcement officer discipline.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Section 38-1104, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
38-1104. Discipline of law enforcement officers; exceptions; definitions
A. A law enforcement officer shall not be subject to disciplinary action except for just cause.
B. Subsection A of this section does not apply to any law enforcement officer who has not completed an initial probationary period if a probationary period is required by the employer or to a dismissal that is for administrative purposes, including a reduction in force.
C. This section does not preempt agreements that supplant, revise or otherwise alter the provisions of this section, including preexisting agreements, between the employer and the law enforcement officer's lawful representative association.
D. This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer who is employed as an at will employee in a executive or managerial position in a law enforcement agency.
D. E. For the purposes of this section:
1. "At will employee" means a person who is employed as an employee who may be terminated on the will of either the employee or employer, at any time, with or without cause.
1. 2. "Disciplinary action" has the same meaning prescribed in section 38‑1101.
2. 3. "Just cause" means:
(a) The employer informed the officer of the possible disciplinary action resulting from the officer's conduct through agency manuals, employee handbooks, the employer's rules and regulations or other communications to the officer or the conduct was such that the officer should have reasonably known disciplinary action could occur.
(b) The disciplinary action is reasonably related to the standards of conduct for a professional law enforcement officer, the mission of the agency, the orderly, efficient or safe operation of the agency or the officer's fitness for duty.
(c) The discipline is supported by a preponderance of evidence that the conduct occurred.
(d) The discipline is not excessive and is reasonably related to the seriousness of the offense and the officer's service record.
3. 4. "Law enforcement officer" means:
(a) An individual who is certified by the Arizona peace officer standards and training board, other than a person employed by a multi-county water conservation district, a reserve police officer, a volunteer or a person who is otherwise exempted by an existing merit system.
(b) A correction officer or detention officer, excluding a juvenile detention officer, who is employed by this state or a political subdivision of this state.
(c) A regularly appointed and paid deputy sheriff of a county.
(d) A regularly employed police officer in a city or town.
