Bill Text: CA AB1168 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Emergency medical services (EMS): prehospital EMS.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Vetoed) 2024-09-28 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB1168 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB1168-Amended.html
1797.232.
Bill Title: Emergency medical services (EMS): prehospital EMS.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Vetoed) 2024-09-28 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB1168 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB1168-Amended.html
|
Amended
IN
Senate
July 03, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
May 26, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
May 01, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 19, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 13, 2023 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 16, 2023 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 1168
| Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett |
February 16, 2023 |
An act to add Sections 1797.11 and 1797.232 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to emergency medical services.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1168, as amended, Bennett.
Emergency medical services (EMS): prehospital EMS.
Existing law, the Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act, governs local emergency medical services (EMS) systems and authorizes each county to develop an EMS program and designate a local EMS agency. Existing law requires a county to enter into a written agreement with a city or fire district that contracted for or provided prehospital EMS as of June 1, 1980. Existing law requires, until that written agreement is reached, prehospital EMS to be continued at not less than the existing level and the administration of prehospital EMS by cities and fire districts contracting for or providing those services as of June 1, 1980, to be retained by those cities and fire districts.
This bill would require a city or fire district
to retain to be treated as if it had retained its authorities regarding, and the administration of, prehospital EMS if it provided, as of June 1, 1980, prehospital EMS through a joint powers agreement with a county and ceased to contract for, provide, or administer prehospital EMS as a result of a judicial finding, as specified, or if it is, as of January 1, 2024, providing prehospital EMS pursuant to statute and enters
a joint powers agreement with a county for joint exercise of powers regarding prehospital EMS. specified requirements are met. If a joint powers agreement regarding prehospital EMS was initially executed on or after January 1, 2024, the bill would ensure a city or fire district retains its existing authorities regarding, and the administration of, prehospital EMS. The bill would state the Legislature’s intent to clarify the effect of joint powers agreements regarding prehospital EMS on specified rights, obligations, and authorities, to reduce disruptions to EMS systems, and to abrogate contrary judicial holdings.
Existing law defines “exclusive operating area” as an EMS area or subarea defined by the emergency medical services plan for which a local EMS agency, upon the recommendation of a county, restricts operations to one or more emergency ambulance
services or providers, as specified. Existing law authorizes a local EMS agency to create one or more exclusive operating areas in the development of a local plan if a competitive process is utilized to select the provider or providers of the services pursuant to the plan.
This bill would require the local EMS agency, if a city’s or fire district’s
assertion of its authorities regarding, and administration of, the prehospital EMS causes a local EMS area to no longer satisfy the requirements for an exclusive operating area as mentioned above, to provide a right of first refusal to the exclusive operating area’s designated provider or providers to continue providing services in a new exclusive operating area comprised composed of the remainder of the local EMS area outside of the city or fire district, city, which would be deemed an exclusive operating area created without a competitive process. The bill would authorize the county to provide prehospital EMS, including
emergency ambulance services, as specified, in the remainder of the local EMS area on an exclusive basis if the designated provider or providers decline to continue services. The bill would require a specified city or fire district
to enter into an agreement with the county to provide prehospital EMS, including emergency ambulance services, within the remainder of the local EMS area on an exclusive basis, as specified, if the county determines that specified options are not economically viable, would reduce the level or quality of care in the remainder of the local EMS area, or are not in the county’s best interests. The bill would require the parties developing contracts pursuant to these provisions to collaborate on response time standards for the local EMS area, and would require those standards to meet or exceed the response time standards previously established by the local EMS agency for that area. By creating new duties for local EMS agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish
procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
The bill would become operative only if AB 716 of the 2023–24 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2024.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YESBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 1797.11 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1797.11.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Local governments’ provision, directly or by contract, administration, and regulation of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) is a matter of public safety and critical to the public peace, health, and safety of the State of California. Recognizing that the state’s communities have diverse needs and resources, local control over the types, levels, and availability of these services is a longstanding tradition in California that the Legislature intends to retain.
(b) This division is designed to encourage coordination and planning among local governments within
county or regional EMS systems in order to achieve the most effective prehospital EMS on a countywide or regionwide basis.
(c) One of the ways in which local governments coordinate, plan, and achieve the most effective countywide or regionwide EMS and leverage their combined resources to carry out their prescribed functions under this division is through agreements for the joint exercise of powers under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(d)Achievement of the foregoing policies and the policies set forth in Sections 1797.1, 1797.2, 1797.5, and 1797.6 of the Health and Safety Code has been hindered,
and the validity of existing and contemplated agreements for the joint exercise of powers regarding EMS has been called into question, by the holding of City of Oxnard v. County of Ventura (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1010, which states that a city was ineligible for, and could no longer exercise its statutory rights and obligations under, Section 1797.201 following the city’s entry into a written agreement with a county for the joint exercise of powers regarding prehospital EMS under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(d) City of Oxnard v. County of Ventura (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1010 has created confusion and concern among the state’s local governments regarding the
utility and desirability of entering into joint powers arrangements for EMS purposes because the decision held, in part, that a city was ineligible for, and did not have the right to administer emergency ambulance services within its territorial jurisdiction under, Section 1797.201 because the city delegated to a county the administration of those services through a joint exercise of powers agreement, which the parties had entered into nearly a decade before the enactment of this chapter.
(e) In enacting Section 1797.232 of the Health and Safety Code, it is the intent of the Legislature to clarify the effect of agreements for the joint exercise of powers regarding prehospital EMS under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code on the rights, obligations, and authorities of counties, local EMS agencies, cities, fire districts, and
EMS providers under the EMS act and to preserve the utility and desirability of those agreements for EMS purposes, to reduce resulting disruptions to existing county and regional EMS systems, and to abrogate any contrary
holdings in City of Oxnard v. County of Ventura (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1010. purposes.
(f) This section and Section 1797.232 of the Health and Safety Code do not authorize the substantial impairment of contractual obligations of an agreement to provide services within an exclusive operating area under Sections 1797.85 and 1797.224 of the Health and Safety Code.
SEC. 2.
Section 1797.232 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:(a)A city or fire district that contracted for or provided, as of June 1, 1980, prehospital EMS through a joint powers agreement with a county that ceased to contract for, provide, or administer prehospital EMS as a result of City of Oxnard v. County of Ventura (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1010, on or before December 31, 2022, shall retain its authorities regarding, and administration of, the prehospital EMS pursuant to Section 1797.201.
(b)A city or fire district that is providing
prehospital EMS as of January 1, 2024, pursuant to Section 1797.201 and enters a
1797.232.
(a) Notwithstanding City of Oxnard v. County of Ventura (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1010, a city shall be treated as if it had retained its authorities regarding, and administration of, prehospital EMS ambulance services within the city’s territorial jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1797.201, only if all of the following requirements are satisfied:(1) The city became a party to a joint powers agreement regarding ambulance services before the enactment of this chapter.(2) The joint powers
agreement provided a county with the sole authority to contract with ambulance service providers on behalf of the other parties to the joint powers agreement.(3) On December 17, 2020, the city provided notice of its withdrawal from the joint powers agreement, effective July 1, 2021.(4) The city ceased to contract for, provide, or administer prehospital EMS ambulance services on or before December 31, 2022.
(b) A joint powers agreement with a county regarding prehospital EMS initially executed on or after
January 1, 2024, between a county and a city or fire district, shall not be construed as a “written agreement with the city or fire district regarding the provision of prehospital emergency medical services for that city or fire district” within the meaning of Section 1797.201, and the city or fire district shall retain its
existing authorities regarding, and administration of, the prehospital EMS pursuant to Section 1797.201. 1797.201, if any, following entry into the joint powers agreement. The joint powers agreement shall provide terms to address the withdrawal of the city or fire district from the agreement and the effect of a withdrawal on the EMS system and exclusive operating areas, if any.
(c) If a city’s or fire district’s assertion of its authorities regarding, and administration of, the prehospital EMS pursuant to Section 1797.201 under subdivision (a) of this section causes a
local EMS area that is currently designated as an exclusive operating agency
area by the local EMS agency to no longer satisfy the requirements for an exclusive operating area under Sections 1797.85 or 1797.224, all of the following shall apply:
(1) The local EMS agency shall provide a right of first refusal to the exclusive operating area’s designated provider or providers to continue providing services in a new exclusive operating area comprised composed of the remainder of the local EMS area outside of the city or fire district, city,
which shall be deemed an exclusive operating area created without a competitive process under Sections 1797.85 or 1797.224.
(2) If the designated provider or providers decline to continue services under paragraph (1), the county may provide prehospital EMS, including emergency ambulance services, in the remainder of the local EMS area on an exclusive basis by doing one of the following:
(A) Assigning the duty of providing such services to the county fire department or a separate county department created for those purposes.
(B) Creating a new exclusive operating area, which shall encompass, at minimum, the remainder of the local EMS area, through a competitive process under Section 1797.224. The exclusive
operating area shall not include the city or fire district specified in subdivision (a), unless that city or fire district is selected to be the provider of the exclusive operating area pursuant to the competitive process.
(3) If the county determines that the options in paragraph (2) are not economically viable, would reduce the level or quality of care available in the remainder of the local EMS area, or are not in the county’s best interests, then the city or
fire district specified in subdivision (a) shall enter an agreement with the county to provide prehospital EMS, including emergency ambulance services, within the remainder of the local EMS area on an exclusive basis consistent with subdivision (e) of Section 14136 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(4) In developing contracts pursuant to this subdivision, the contracting parties shall collaborate on response time standards for the local EMS area, which shall meet or exceed the response time standards previously established by the local EMS agency for that area.
(5) Contracts developed pursuant to this subdivision shall include the local EMS agency’s EMS system requirements and the response time standards from paragraph (4).
(6) A contract, or subcontract for emergency ambulance services, developed pursuant to this subdivision shall comply with the requirements of subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 1797.230 and subdivisions (b), (c), and (d) of Section 1797.231.
(7) If the designated provider or providers decline to continue services under paragraph (1), the city or fire district specified in subdivision (a) shall provide services within the local EMS area until the time the county completes the requirements in paragraphs (2) to (5), inclusive, pursuant to the same contractual, permitting, or regulatory terms, conditions, and requirements of the county for that area, except as otherwise agreed to by the county and the city or fire district.
city.
(d) For purposes of this section, “joint powers agreement” means an agreement for the joint exercise of powers under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code.
(e) This section does not affect, modify, limit, or otherwise impair the medical control of the medical director of a local EMS agency granted under this division, including, but not limited to, Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1798).
(f) This section does not affect, modify, limit, or otherwise impair or enlarge the local EMS agency’s ability to set response time standards for all providers within a local EMS area.
