Bill Text: CA AB1521 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 5-0)
Status: (Passed) 2015-10-10 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 755, Statutes of 2015. [AB1521 Detail]
Download: California-2015-AB1521-Amended.html
Bill Title: Disability access: construction-related accessibility claims.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 5-0)
Status: (Passed) 2015-10-10 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 755, Statutes of 2015. [AB1521 Detail]
Download: California-2015-AB1521-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: AB 1521 AMENDED
BILL TEXT
AMENDED IN SENATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2015
AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 17, 2015
AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 16, 2015
AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 2, 2015
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 21, 2015
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 6, 2015
INTRODUCED BY Committee on Judiciary (Assembly Members Mark Stone
(Chair), Chau, Chiu, Cristina Garcia, and Holden)
MARCH 10, 2015
An act to amend Sections 55.3 55.3, 55.32,
and 55.54 of, and to add Section 54.35 to,
of the Civil Code, to amend Section 425.50 of, and to add
Section 425.55 to, the Code of Civil Procedure, and to add Sections
68085.35 and 70616.5 to the Government Code, relating to disability
access, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect
immediately.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1521, as amended, Committee on Judiciary. Disability access:
construction-related accessibility claims.
Existing law provides that individuals with disabilities or
medical conditions have the same right as the general public to the
full and free use of the streets, highways, sidewalks, walkways,
public buildings, medical facilities, public facilities, and other
public places, and allows a person who is aggrieved or potentially
aggrieved by a violation of specific provisions of law to bring an
action to enjoin the violation. Existing law requires an attorney to
provide a written advisory with each demand letter or complaint, as
defined, sent to or served upon a defendant or potential defendant
for any construction-related accessibility claim, as specified.
This bill would require the above-described advisory to include
additional information regarding the rights and obligations of
business owners and commercial tenants, as specified. In addition to
the written advisory, the bill would require an attorney to provide a
defendant or potential defendant of a construction-related
accessibility claim with an a verified
answer form developed by the Judicial Council, which would allow a
defendant to respond in the event a complaint is filed, as specified.
The bill would, on or before July 1, 2016, require the Judicial
Council to update the advisory form and adopt the answer form, as
specified.
Existing law authorizes commencement of an action for damages
against persons who interfere with these access rights, including,
but not limited to, actions against owners and tenants of property
for construction-related barriers.
This bill would, with certain exceptions, require the owner of
property to which the general public is invited to indemnify a
microbusiness tenant, as defined, from liability arising from any
construction-related accessibility claims, as specified.
Existing law requires a demand letter alleging a violation of a
construction-related accessibility standard or asserting a
construction-related accessibility claim to include specified
information and, among other things, until January 1, 2016, requires
an attorney who provides a demand letter to send a copy of the demand
letter to the State Bar of California.
This bill would extend that requirement until January 1, 2019.
Existing law requires an attorney who sends or serves a complaint
on the basis of a construction-related accessibility claim to also
send a copy of the complaint to the California Commission on
Disability Access.
This bill would additionally require the attorney to notify the
commission within 5 business days of judgment, settlement, or
dismissal of the claim or claims alleged in the complaint of
specified information, including, among others, whether or not the
construction-related accessibility violations alleged in the
complaint were remedied in whole or in part after the plaintiff filed
a complaint or provided a demand letter.
Existing law requires every pleading, petition, or other similar
paper to be signed by an attorney, or the party in cases where the
party is not represented by counsel, as specified. Existing law
further provides that an attorney or unrepresented party who presents
a pleading, petition, or other similar paper to the court is
certifying that specified conditions have been met, including, but
not limited to, that the action is not being presented primarily for
an improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay.
This bill would specify that those requirements and provisions
apply to a complaint alleging a construction-related accessibility
claim.
Existing law authorizes a defendant to file a request for a court
stay and an early evaluation conference in the proceedings under
certain circumstances, and tolls the period for responsive pleadings.
This bill would specify that these provisions also apply if a
defendant is a business that has been served with a complaint filed
by a high-frequency litigant, as defined, or is a business requesting
an early evaluation conference.
Existing law, upon the filing of an application for a court stay
and an early evaluation conference by a defendant, requires the court
to immediately issue an order that does certain things, including,
but not limited to, scheduling a mandatory early evaluation
conference for a date as soon as possible from the date of the order,
but in no event later than 70 days after the issuance of the order.
This bill would, if requested by the defendant, additionally
require the court order to direct the parties and their counsel to
meet at the premises, or other place as specified, no later than 30
days after issuance of the court order, to jointly inspect the
premises, and review any programmatic or policy issues, that are
claimed to constitute a violation of a construction-related
accessibility standard. The bill would authorize the court to allow a
plaintiff who is unable to meet in person at the premises to be
excused from participation, or participate by alternative means, for
good cause and would provide that a plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel
is not required to attend more than one in-person site meeting.
Existing law requires a complaint alleging a construction-related
accessibility claim to be verified by the plaintiff or be subject to
a motion to strike, and further requires that an allegation of a
construction-related accessibility claim in a complaint state facts
sufficient to allow a reasonable person to identify the basis of the
violation, including, but not limited to, a plain language
explanation of the specific access barrier or barriers the individual
encountered, or by which the individual alleges he or she was
deterred.
This bill would, for cases filed by or on behalf of a
high-frequency litigant, require the complaint to also state
that whether the complaint is filed by, or on
behalf of, a high-frequency litigant, the number of complaints
alleging a construction-related accessibility claim that the
high-frequency litigant has filed during the 12 months prior to
filing the complaint, and the reason why the individual visited the
place of public accommodation. By expanding the definition of the
crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local
program.
Existing law imposes a supplemental fee for filing first papers
in certain civil proceedings, including, but not limited to, certain
complex cases.
This bill would, in addition to the first paper filing fee,
require payment of a single high-frequency litigant fee of $1,000, at
the time of the filing of the first paper if the complaint alleges a
construction-related accessibility claim and the plaintiff is a
high-frequency litigant, and would make conforming changes related to
the distribution of those fees.
Existing constitutional provisions require a statute that limits
the right of public access to meeting or writings of public officials
to be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest to be
protected by that limitation and the need to protect that interest.
This bill would declare that it includes limitations on access,
that the interests to be protected are the privacy rights of the
litigants, and that the need to protect those interests is to prevent
a chilling effect on litigation.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as
an urgency statute.
Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 54.35 is added to the Civil
Code, immediately following Section 54.3, to read:
54.35. (a) Notwithstanding any law, the owner of property to
which the general public is invited, as set forth in Section 54.1,
shall indemnify a microbusiness tenant of that property for any
liability under this part arising from any construction-related
accessibility claims, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a)
of Section 55.3, if the owner of the property had knowledge or notice
that either of the following applied:
(1) The construction-related barrier existed prior to the
initiation, renewal, or extension of the lease which is the basis of
the microbusiness tenant's liability.
(2) The construction-related barrier was created by parties other
than the microbusiness tenant after the initiation, renewal, or
extension of the lease which is the basis of the microbusiness tenant'
s liability.
(b) The duty of the owner to indemnify a microbusiness tenant
pursuant to subdivision (a) may be modified through a written
agreement that may be included as a separate rider to the lease
agreement, setting forth the terms under which the microbusiness
tenant is accepting some or all of the potential liability for
construction-related claims, including, but not limited to, a grant
of the authority for the microbusiness tenant to modify the structure
in order to comply with this part, and a process for determining the
owner's share of the costs of those modifications.
(c) For the purposes of this section, "microbusiness" has the same
meaning as set forth in Section 14837 of the Government Code.
(d) This section shall apply only to construction-related
liability arising from leases entered into, amended, or extended, on
and after January 1, 2016.
SEC. 2. SECTION 1. Section 55.3 of
the Civil Code is amended to read:
55.3. (a) For purposes of this section, the following apply:
(1) "Complaint" means a civil complaint that is filed or is to be
filed with a court and is sent to or served upon a defendant on the
basis of one or more construction-related accessibility claims, as
defined in this section.
(2) "Construction-related accessibility claim" means any claim of
a violation of any construction-related accessibility standard, as
defined by paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.52, with
respect to a place of public accommodation. "Construction-related
accessibility claim" does not include a claim of interference with
housing within the meaning of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of
Section 54.1, or any claim of interference caused by something other
than the construction-related accessibility condition of the
property, including, but not limited to, the conduct of any person.
(3) "Demand for money" means a prelitigation written document or
oral statement that is provided or issued to a building owner or
tenant, or the owner's or tenant's agent or employee, that does all
of the following:
(A) Alleges that the site is in violation of one or more
construction-related accessibility standards, as defined in paragraph
(6) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.52, or alleges one or more
construction-related accessibility claims, as defined in paragraph
(2).
(B) Contains or makes a request or demand for money or an offer or
agreement to accept money.
(C) Is provided or issued whether or not the attorney intends to
file a complaint, or eventually files a complaint, in state or
federal court.
(4) "Demand letter" means a prelitigation written document that is
provided to a building owner or tenant, or the owner's or tenant's
agent or employee, that alleges the site is in violation of one or
more construction-related accessibility standards, as defined in
paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.52, or alleges one or
more construction-related accessibility claims, as defined in
paragraph (2), and is provided whether or not the attorney intends to
file a complaint, or eventually files a complaint, in state or
federal court.
(b) An attorney shall provide the following items with each demand
letter or complaint sent to or served upon a defendant or potential
defendant alleging a construction-related accessibility claim:
(1) A written advisory on the form described in subparagraph (B),
or, until that form is available, on a separate page or pages that
are clearly distinguishable from the demand letter or complaint. The
advisory shall not be required in subsequent communications following
the initial demand letter or initial complaint unless a new
construction-related accessibility claim is asserted in the
subsequent demand letter or amended complaint.
(A) The advisory shall state as follows:
STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT YOU GET THIS IMPORTANT ADVISORY
INFORMATION FOR BUILDING OWNERS AND TENANTS
This information is available in English, Spanish, Chinese,
Vietnamese, and Korean through the Judicial Council of California.
Persons with visual impairments can get assistance in viewing this
form through the Judicial Council Internet Web site at
www.courts.ca.gov.
California law requires that you receive this information because
the demand letter or court complaint you received with this document
claims that your building or property does not comply with one or
more existing construction-related accessibility laws or regulations
protecting the civil rights of persons with disabilities to access
public places.
YOU HAVE IMPORTANT LEGAL OBLIGATIONS. Compliance with disability
access laws is a serious and significant responsibility that applies
to all California building owners and tenants with buildings open for
business to the public. You may obtain information about your legal
obligations and how to comply with disability access laws through the
Division of the State Architect at www.dgs.ca.gov. Information is
also available from the California Commission on Disability Access at
www.ccda.ca.gov/guide.htm.
YOU HAVE IMPORTANT LEGAL RIGHTS. The allegations made in the
accompanying demand letter or court complaint do not mean that you
are required to pay any money unless and until a court finds you
liable. Moreover, RECEIPT OF A DEMAND LETTER OR COURT COMPLAINT AND
THIS ADVISORY DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN YOU WILL BE FOUND LIABLE FOR
ANYTHING. You will have the right if you are later sued to fully
present your explanation why you believe you have not in fact
violated disability access laws or have corrected the violation or
violations giving rise to the claim.
You have the right to seek assistance or advice about this demand
letter or court complaint from any person of your choice. If you have
insurance, you may also wish to contact your insurance provider.
Your best interest may be served by seeking legal advice or
representation from an attorney, but you may also represent yourself
and file the necessary court papers to protect your interests if you
are served with a court complaint. If you have hired an attorney to
represent you, you should immediately notify your attorney.
If a court complaint has been served on you, you will get a
separate advisory notice with the complaint advising you of special
options and procedures available to you under certain conditions.
ADDITIONAL THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW:
ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT. Except for limited circumstances, state law
generally requires that a prelitigation demand letter from an
attorney MAY NOT MAKE A REQUEST OR DEMAND FOR MONEY OR AN OFFER OR
AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT MONEY. Moreover, a demand letter from an attorney
MUST INCLUDE THE ATTORNEY'S STATE BAR LICENSE NUMBER.
If you believe the attorney who provided you with this notice and
prelitigation demand letter is not complying with state law, you may
send a copy of the demand letter you received from the attorney to
the State Bar of California by facsimile transmission to
1-415-538-2171, or by mail to the State Bar of California, 180 Howard
Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, Attention: Professional
Competence.
REDUCING YOUR DAMAGES. If you are a small business owner and
correct all of the construction-related violations that are the basis
of the complaint against you within 30 days of being served with the
complaint, you may qualify for reduced damages if the
matter results in a court judgment. If you believe you qualify for
reduced damages, you damages. You may wish to
consult an attorney to obtain legal advice, or
advice. You may also wish to contact the California
Commission on Disability Access for additional information about the
rights and obligations of business owners.
COMMERCIAL TENANT. If you are a commercial tenant, you may not be
responsible for ensuring that some or all portions of the premises
you lease for your business, including common areas such as parking
lots, are accessible to the public because those areas may be the
responsibility of your landlord. You may want to refer to your lease
agreement and consult with an attorney or contact your landlord, to
determine if your landlord is responsible under the terms of
your lease for maintaining and improving some or all of
the areas you lease to operate your business.
lease.
(B) On or before July 1, 2016, the Judicial Council shall update
the advisory form that may be used by an attorney to comply with the
requirements of subparagraph (A). The advisory form shall be in
substantially the same format and include all of the text set forth
in subparagraph (A). The advisory form shall be available in English,
Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean, and shall include a
statement that the advisory form is available in additional
languages, and the Judicial Council Internet Web site address where
the different versions of the advisory form are located. The advisory
form shall include Internet Web site information for the Division of
the State Architect and the California Commission on Disability
Access.
(2) An A verified answer form
developed by the Judicial Council, which allows a defendant to
respond to the complaint in the event a complaint is filed.
(A) The answer form shall be written in plain language and allow
the defendant to state any relevant information affecting the
defendant's liability or damages including, but not limited to, the
following:
(i) Specific denials of the allegations in the complaint,
including whether the plaintiff has demonstrated that he or she was
denied full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on
a particular occasion pursuant to Section 55.56.
(ii) Potential affirmative defenses available to the defendant,
including:
(I) An assertion that the defendant's landlord is responsible for
ensuring that some or all of the property leased by the defendant,
including the areas at issue in the complaint, are accessible to the
public. The defendant shall provide facts supporting that assertion,
and the name and contact information of the defendant's landlord.
(II) Any other affirmative defense the defendant wishes to assert.
(iii) A request to meet in person at the subject premises, if the
defendant qualifies for an early evaluation conference pursuant to
Section 55.54.
(iv) Any other information that the defendant believes is relevant
to his or her potential liability or damages, including that the
defendant qualifies for reduced damages pursuant to paragraph (1) or
(2) of subdivision (f) of Section 55.56, and, if so, any facts
supporting that assertion.
(B) The answer form shall provide instructions to a defendant who
wishes to file the form as an answer to the complaint. The form shall
also notify the defendant that he or she may use the completed form
as an informal response to a demand letter or for settlement
discussion purposes.
(C) On or before July 1, 2016, the Judicial Council shall adopt
the answer form that may be used by an attorney to comply with the
requirements of this paragraph, and shall post the answer form on the
Judicial Council Internet web Web
site.
(c) Subdivision (b) applies only to a demand letter or complaint
made by an attorney. This section does not affect the right to file a
civil complaint under any other law or regulation protecting the
physical access rights of persons with disabilities. Additionally,
this section does not require a party to provide or send a demand
letter to another party before proceeding against that party with a
civil complaint.
(d) This section does not apply to an action brought by the
Attorney General or any district attorney, city attorney, or county
counsel.
SEC. 2. Section 55.32 of the Civil Code
, as added by Section 5 of Chapter 383 of the Statutes of
2012, is amended to read:
55.32. (a) An attorney who provides a demand letter, as defined
in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall do all of the following:
(1) Include the attorney's State Bar license number in the demand
letter.
(2) Contemporaneously with providing the demand letter, send a
copy of the demand letter to the State Bar of California by facsimile
transmission at 1-415-538-2171, or by mail to 180 Howard Street, San
Francisco, CA, 94105, Attention: Professional Competence.
(3) Within five business days of providing the demand letter, send
a copy of the demand letter to the California Commission on
Disability Access.
(b) An attorney who sends or serves a complaint, as defined in
subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall send
do both of the following:
(1) Send a copy of the complaint
to the California Commission on Disability Access within five
business days of sending or serving the complaint.
(2) Notify the California Commission on Disability Access within
five business days of judgment, settlement, or dismissal of the claim
or claims alleged in the complaint of the following information in a
standard format specified by the commission:
(A) The date of the judgment, settlement, or dismissal.
(B) Whether or not the construction-related accessibility
violations alleged in the complaint were remedied in whole or in part
after the plaintiff filed a complaint or provided a demand letter,
as defined by Section 55.3.
(C) If the construction-related accessibility violations alleged
in the complaint were not remedied in whole or in part after the
plaintiff filed a complaint or provided a demand letter, as defined
by Section 55.3, whether or not another favorable result was achieved
after the plaintiff filed the complaint or provided the demand
letter.
(D) Whether or not the defendant submitted an application for an
early evaluation conference and stay pursuant to Section 55.54,
whether the defendant requested a site inspection, the date of any
early evaluation conference, and the date of any site inspection.
(c) A violation of paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) or
subdivision (b) shall constitute cause for the imposition of
discipline of an attorney where a copy of the complaint or
complaint, demand letter
letter, or notification of a case outcome is not sent to the
California Commission on Disability Access within five business days,
or a copy of the demand letter is not sent to the State Bar within
five business days. In the event the State Bar receives information
indicating that an attorney has failed to send a copy of the
complaint or complaint, demand letter
letter, or notification of a case outcome to the
California Commission on Disability Access within five business
days, the State Bar shall investigate to determine whether paragraph
(3) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) has been violated.
(d) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), an attorney is not
required to send to the State Bar of California or the California
Commission on Disability Access a copy of any subsequent demand
letter or amended complaint in the same dispute following the initial
demand letter or complaint, unless that subsequent demand letter or
amended complaint alleges a new construction-related accessibility
claim.
(e) A demand letter or complaint sent to the California Commission
on Disability Access shall be for the informational purposes of
Section 8299.08 of the Government Code. A demand letter received by
the State Bar from either the sender or recipient of the demand
letter shall be reviewed by the State Bar to determine whether
subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31 has been violated.
(f) (1) Commencing July 31, 2013, and annually each July 31
thereafter, the State Bar shall report to the Legislature and the
Chairs of the Senate and Assembly Committees on Judiciary, both of
the following with respect to demand letters received by the State
Bar:
(A) The number of investigations opened to date on a suspected
violation of subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31.
(B) Whether any disciplinary action resulted from the
investigation, and the results of that disciplinary action.
(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be
submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(g) The California Commission on Disability Access shall review
and report on the demand letters and complaints it receives as
provided in Section 8299.08 of the Government Code.
(h) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (a) and subdivision (b)
shall not apply to a demand letter or complaint sent or filed by an
attorney employed or retained by a qualified legal services project
or a qualified support center, as defined in Section 6213 of the
Business and Professions Code, when acting within the scope of
employment in asserting a construction-related accessibility claim.
The Legislature finds and declares that qualified legal services
projects and support centers are extensively regulated by the State
Bar of California, and that there is no evidence of any abusive use
of demand letters or complaints by these organizations. The
Legislature further finds that, in light of the evidence of the
extraordinarily small number of construction-related accessibility
cases brought by regulated legal services programs, and given the
resources of those programs, exempting regulated legal services
programs from the requirements of this section to report to the
California Commission on Disability Access will not affect the
purpose of the reporting to, and tabulation by, the commission of all
other construction-related accessibility claims.
(i) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2013.
(j) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,
2016, 2019, and as of that date is
repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted
before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date.
repealed.
SEC. 3. Section 55.32 of the Civil Code
, as added by Section 6 of Chapter 383 of the Statutes of
2012, is amended to read:
55.32. (a) An attorney who provides a demand letter, as defined
in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall do all of the following:
(1) Include the attorney's State Bar license number in the demand
letter.
(2) Within five business days of providing the demand letter, send
a copy of the demand letter to the California Commission on
Disability Access.
(b) An attorney who sends or serves a complaint, as defined in
subdivision (a) of Section 55.3, shall send
do both of the following:
(1) Send a copy of the complaint
to the California Commission on Disability Access within five
business days of sending or serving the complaint.
(2) Notify the California Commission on Disability Access within
five business days of judgment, settlement, or dismissal of the claim
or claims alleged in the complaint of the following information in a
standard format specified by the commission:
(A) The date of the judgment, settlement, or dismissal.
(B) Whether or not the construction-related accessibility
violations alleged in the complaint were remedied in whole or in part
after the plaintiff filed a complaint or provided a demand letter,
as defined by Section 55.3.
(C) If the construction-related accessibility violations alleged
in the complaint were not remedied in whole or in part after the
plaintiff filed a complaint or provided a demand letter, as defined
by Section 55.3, whether or not another favorable result was achieved
after the plaintiff filed the complaint or provided the demand
letter.
(D) Whether or not the defendant submitted an application for an
early evaluation conference and stay pursuant to Section 55.54,
whether the defendant requested a site inspection, the date of any
early evaluation conference, and the date of any site inspection.
(c) A violation of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) or subdivision
(b) shall constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of an
attorney if a copy of the demand letter or complaint
letter, complaint, or notification of a case outcome
is not sent to the California Commission on Disability Access
within five business days. In the event the State Bar receives
information indicating that an attorney has failed to send a copy of
the demand letter or complaint letter,
complaint, or notification of a case outcome to the California
Commission on Disability Access within five business days, the State
Bar shall investigate to determine whether paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) has been violated.
(d) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), an attorney is not
required to send to the California Commission on Disability Access a
copy of any subsequent demand letter or amended complaint in the same
dispute following the initial demand letter or complaint, unless
that subsequent demand letter or amended complaint alleges a new
construction-related accessibility claim.
(e) A demand letter sent to the California Commission on
Disability Access shall be for the informational purposes of Section
8299.08 of the Government Code. A demand letter received by the State
Bar from the recipient of the demand letter shall be reviewed by the
State Bar to determine whether subdivision (b) or (c) of Section
55.31 has been violated.
(f) (1) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government Code, on
or before July 31, 2016, 2019, and
annually thereafter, the State Bar shall report to the Legislature
and the Chairs of the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees, both
of the following with respect to demand letters received by the State
Bar:
(A) The number of investigations opened to date on a suspected
violation of subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31.
(B) Whether any disciplinary action resulted from the
investigation, and the results of that disciplinary action.
(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to this subdivision shall be
submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
(g) The California Commission on Disability Access shall review
and report on the demand letters and complaints it receives as
provided in Section 8299.08 of the Government Code.
(h) The expiration of any ground for discipline of an attorney
shall not affect the imposition of discipline for any act prior to
the expiration. An act or omission that constituted cause for
imposition of discipline of an attorney when committed or omitted
prior to January 1, 2016, 2019, shall
continue to constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of that
attorney on and after January 1, 2016. 2019.
(i) Paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) and subdivision (b) shall not
apply to a demand letter or complaint sent or filed by an attorney
employed or retained by a qualified legal services project or a
qualified support center, as defined in Section 6213 of the Business
and Professions Code, when acting within the scope of employment in
asserting a construction-related accessibility claim. The Legislature
finds and declares that qualified legal services projects and
support centers are extensively regulated by the State Bar of
California, and that there is no evidence of any abusive use of
demand letters or complaints by these organizations. The Legislature
further finds that, in light of the evidence of the extraordinarily
small number of construction-related accessibility cases brought by
regulated legal services programs, and given the resources of those
programs, exempting regulated legal services programs from the
requirements of this section to report to the California Commission
on Disability Access will not affect the purpose of the reporting to,
and tabulation by, the commission of all other construction-related
accessibility claims.
(j) This section shall become operative on January 1,
2016. 2019.
SEC. 3. SEC. 4. Section 55.54 of the
Civil Code is amended to read:
55.54. (a) (1) An attorney who causes a summons and complaint to
be served in an action that includes a construction-related
accessibility claim, including, but not limited to, a claim brought
under Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55, shall, at the same time, cause to
be served a copy of the application form specified in subdivision (c)
and a copy of the following notice, including, until January 1,
2013, the bracketed text, to the defendant on separate papers that
shall be served with the summons and complaint:
ADVISORY NOTICE TO DEFENDANT
YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO ASK FOR A COURT STAY (AN ORDER TEMPORARILY
STOPPING ANY LAWSUIT) AND EARLY EVALUATION CONFERENCE IN THIS LAWSUIT
AND MAY BE ASSESSED REDUCED STATUTORY DAMAGES IF YOU MEET CERTAIN
CONDITIONS.
If the construction-related accessibility claim pertains to a site
that has a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) inspection report for
that site, or to a site where new construction or improvement was
approved after January 1, 2008, by the local building permit and
inspection process, you may make an immediate request for a court
stay and early evaluation conference in the construction-related
accessibility claim by filing the attached application form with the
court. You may be entitled to the court stay and early evaluation
conference regarding the accessibility claim only if ALL
of the statements in the application
form applicable to you are true.
FURTHER, if you are a defendant described above (with a CASp
inspection report or with new construction after January 1, 2008),
and, to the best of your knowledge, there have been no modifications
or alterations completed or commenced since the CASp report or
building department approval of the new construction or improvement
that impacted compliance with construction-related accessibility
standards with respect to the plaintiff's claim, your liability for
minimum statutory damages may be reduced to $1,000 for each offense,
unless the violation was intentional, and if all construction-related
accessibility violations giving rise to the claim are corrected
within 60 days of being served with this complaint.
ALSO, if your business has been served with a complaint filed by a
high-frequency litigant, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section
425.55 of the Code of Civil Procedure, asserting a
construction-related accessibility claim, including, but not limited
to, a claim brought under Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55 of the Civil
Code, you may also be entitled to a court stay,
stay and an early evaluation conference, and a
site visit. conference. If you choose to request
a stay and early evaluation conference, you may also request to meet
in person with the plaintiff and counsel for both parties, as well
as experts if the parties so elect, at the subject premises no later
than 30 days after issuance of the court order to jointly inspect the
portions of the subject premises and review any conditions that are
claimed to constitute a violation of a construction-related
accessibility standard.
IN ADDITION, if your business is a small business that, over the
previous three years, or the existence of the business if less than
three years, employs 25 or fewer employees on average over that time
period and meets specified gross receipts criteria, you may also be
entitled to the court stay and early evaluation conference and your
minimum statutory damages for each claim may be reduced to $2,000 for
each offense, unless the violation was intentional, and if all the
alleged construction-related accessibility violations are corrected
within 30 days of being served with the complaint.
If you plan to correct the violations giving rise to the claim, you
should take pictures and measurements or similar action to document
the condition of the physical barrier asserted to be the basis for a
violation before undertaking any corrective action in case a court
needs to see the condition of a barrier before it was corrected.
The court will schedule the conference to be held within 70 days
after you file the attached application form.
If you are not a defendant with a CASp inspection report, until
a form is adopted by the Judicial Council, you may use the attached
form if you modify the form and supplement it with your declaration
stating any one of the following:
(1) Until January 1, 2018, that the site's new construction or
improvement on or after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2016,
was approved pursuant to the local building permit and inspection
process; that, to the best of your knowledge, there have been no
modifications or alterations completed or commenced since the
building department approval that impacted compliance with
construction-related accessibility standards with respect to the
plaintiff's claim; and that all violations giving rise to the claim
have been corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of the
complaint being served.
(2) That the site's new construction or improvement passed
inspection by a local building department inspector who is a
certified access specialist; that, to the best of your knowledge,
there have been no modifications or alterations completed or
commenced since that inspection approval that impacted compliance
with construction-related accessibility standards with respect to the
plaintiff's claim; and that all violations giving rise to the claim
have been corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of the
complaint being served.
(3) That your business is a small business with 25 or fewer
employees and meets the gross receipts criteria set out in Section
55.56 of the Civil Code, and that all violations giving rise to the
claim have been corrected, or will be corrected within 30 days of
being served with the complaint.]
The court will also issue an immediate stay of the proceedings
unless the plaintiff has obtained a temporary restraining order in
the construction-related accessibility claim. You may obtain a copy
of the application form, filing instructions, and additional
information about the stay and early evaluation conference through
the Judicial Council Internet Web site at
www.courts.ca.gov/selfhelp-start.htm.
You may file the application after you are served with a summons
and complaint, but no later than your first court pleading or
appearance in this case, which is due within 30 days after you
receive the summons and complaint. If you do not file the
application, you will still need to file your reply to the lawsuit
within 30 days after you receive the summons and complaint to contest
it. You may obtain more information about how to represent yourself
and how to file a reply without hiring an attorney at
www.courts.ca.gov/selfhelp-start.htm.
You may file the application without the assistance of an attorney,
but it may be in your best interest to immediately seek the
assistance of an attorney experienced in disability access laws when
you receive a summons and complaint. You may make an offer to settle
the case, and it may be in your interest to put that offer in writing
so that it may be considered under Section 55.55 of the Civil Code.
(2) An attorney who files a Notice of Substitution of Counsel to
appear as counsel for a plaintiff who, acting in propria persona, had
previously filed a complaint in an action that includes a
construction-related accessibility claim, including, but not limited
to, a claim brought under Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55, shall, at the
same time, cause to be served a copy of the application form
specified in subdivision (c) and a copy of the notice specified in
paragraph (1) upon the defendant on separate pages that shall be
attached to the Notice of Substitution of Counsel.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, upon being served with a
summons and complaint asserting a construction-related accessibility
claim, including, but not limited to, a claim brought under Section
51, 54, 54.1, or 55, a qualified defendant, or other defendant as
defined in paragraph (2), may file a request for a court stay and
early evaluation conference in the proceedings of that claim prior to
or simultaneous with that defendant's responsive pleading or other
initial appearance in the action that includes the claim. If that
defendant filed a timely request for stay and early evaluation
conference before a responsive pleading was due, the period for
filing a responsive pleading shall be tolled until the stay is
lifted. Any responsive pleading filed simultaneously with a request
for stay and early evaluation conference may be amended without
prejudice, and the period for filing that amendment shall be tolled
until the stay is lifted.
(2) This subdivision shall also apply to a defendant if any of the
following apply:
(A) Until January 1, 2018, the site's new construction or
improvement on or after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2016,
was approved pursuant to the local building permit and inspection
process, and the defendant declares with the application that, to the
best of the defendant's knowledge, there have been no modifications
or alterations completed or commenced since that approval that
impacted compliance with construction-related accessibility standards
with respect to the plaintiff's claim, and that all violations have
been corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of being served
with the complaint.
(B) The site's new construction or improvement was approved by a
local public building department inspector who is a certified access
specialist, and the defendant declares with the application that, to
the best of the defendant's knowledge, there have been no
modifications or alterations completed or commenced since that
approval that impacted compliance with construction-related
accessibility standards with respect to the plaintiff's claim, and
that all violations have been corrected, or will be corrected within
60 days of being served with the complaint.
(C) The defendant is a small business described in subdivision (f)
of Section 55.56, and the defendant declares with the application
that all violations have been corrected, or will be corrected within
30 days of being served with the complaint.
(D) The defendant is a business that has been served with a
complaint filed by a high-frequency litigant, as defined in
subdivision (b) of Section 425.55 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
asserting a construction-related accessibility claim, including, but
not limited to, a claim brought under Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55.
(3) Notwithstanding any other law, if the plaintiff had acted in
propria persona in filing a complaint that includes a
construction-related accessibility claim, including, but not limited
to, a claim brought under Section 51, 54, 54.1, or 55, a qualified
defendant, or a defendant described by paragraph (2), who is served
with a Notice of Substitution of Counsel shall have 30 days to file
an application for a stay and an early evaluation conference. The
application may be filed prior to or after the defendant's filing of
a responsive pleading or other initial appearance in the action that
includes the claim, except that an application may not be filed in a
claim in which an early evaluation conference or settlement
conference has already been held on the claim.
(c) (1) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay
by a qualified defendant shall include a signed declaration that
states both of the following:
(A) The site identified in the complaint has been CASp-inspected
or meets applicable standards, or is CASp determination pending or
has been inspected by a CASp, and if the site is CASp-inspected or
meets applicable standards, there have been no modifications
completed or commenced since the date of inspection that may impact
compliance with construction-related accessibility standards to the
best of the defendant's knowledge.
(B) An inspection report pertaining to the site has been issued by
a CASp. The inspection report shall be provided to the court and the
plaintiff at least 15 days prior to the court date set for the early
evaluation conference.
(2) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay by
a defendant described by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (b), which may be filed until January 1, 2018, shall
include a signed declaration that states all of the following:
(A) The site's new construction or improvement was approved
pursuant to the local building permit and inspection process on or
after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2016.
(B) To the best of the defendant's knowledge there have been no
modifications or alterations completed or commenced since that
approval that impacted compliance with construction-related
accessibility standards with respect to the plaintiff's claim.
(C) All construction-related violations giving rise to the claim
have been corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of the
complaint being served upon the defendant.
(3) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay by
a defendant described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (b) shall include a signed declaration that states all of
the following:
(A) The site's new construction or improvement was approved by a
local building department inspector who is a certified access
specialist.
(B) To the best of the defendant's knowledge there have been no
modifications or alterations completed or commenced since that
approval that impacted compliance with construction-related
accessibility standards with respect to the plaintiff's claim.
(C) All construction related violations giving rise to the claim
have been corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of the
complaint being served upon the defendant.
(4) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay by
a defendant described by subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (b) shall include the materials listed in paragraphs (5)
and (6) of this subdivision, and shall include a signed declaration
that states both of the following:
(A) The defendant is a small business that employs 25 or fewer
employees and meets the gross receipts eligibility criteria provided
in paragraph (2) of subdivision (f) of Section 55.56.
(B) All construction-related violations giving rise to the claim
have been corrected, or will be corrected within 30 days of the
complaint being served upon the defendant.
(5) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay by
a small business defendant under paragraph (4) shall include evidence
showing correction of all violations within 30 days of the service
of the complaint and served upon the plaintiff with the reply unless
the application is filed prior to completion of the corrections. In
that event, the evidence shall be provided to the court and served
upon the plaintiff within 10 days of the court order as provided in
paragraph (4) of subdivision (d). This paragraph shall not be
construed to extend the permissible time under subdivision (f) of
Section 55.56 to make the corrections.
(6) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay by
a small business defendant under paragraph (4) shall also include
both of the following, which shall be confidential documents filed
only with the court and not served upon or available to the
plaintiff:
(A) Proof of the defendant's number of employees, as shown by wage
report forms filed with the Employment Development Department.
(B) Proof of the defendant's average gross receipts for the
previous three years, or for the existence of the business if less
than three years, as shown by a federal or state tax document.
(7) An application for an early evaluation conference and stay by
a defendant described by subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (b) shall include a signed declaration that
the defendant was served with a complaint filed by a high-frequency
litigant, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 425.55 of the Code
of Civil Procedure, asserting a construction-related accessibility
claim, including, but not limited to, a claim brought under Section
51, 54, 54.1, or 55.
(8) The following provisional request and notice forms may be used
and filed by a qualified defendant until forms are adopted by the
Judicial Council for those purposes pursuant to subdivision ( l
): GRAPHIC INSERT HERE: SEE PRINTED VERSION OF THE BILL]
(9) The provisional forms and any replacement Judicial Council
forms shall include the defendant's declaration of proof of service
of the application, the notice of the court's order, and the court's
order pursuant to subdivision (d).
(d) Upon the filing of an application for stay and early
evaluation conference by a qualified defendant, or a defendant
described by paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), the court shall
immediately issue an order that does all of the following:
(1) Grants a 90-day stay of the proceedings with respect to the
construction-related accessibility claim, unless the plaintiff has
obtained temporary injunctive relief that is still in place for the
construction-related accessibility claim.
(2) Schedules a mandatory early evaluation conference for a date
as soon as possible from the date of the order, but in no event later
than 70 days after issuance of the order, and in no event earlier
than 50 days after the filing of the request.
(3) Directs the parties, and any other person whose authority is
required to negotiate and enter into settlement, to appear in person
at the time set for the conference. Appearance by counsel shall not
satisfy the requirement that the parties or those with negotiation
and settlement authority personally appear, provided, however, that
the court may allow a party who is unable to attend in person due to
his or her disability to participate in the hearing by telephone or
other alternative means or through a representative authorized to
settle the case.
(4) (A) Directs the qualified defendant to file with the court and
serve on the plaintiff a copy of any relevant CASp inspection report
at least 15 days before the date of the conference. The CASp
inspection report is confidential and is available only as set forth
in paragraph (5) of this subdivision and in paragraph (4) of
subdivision (e).
(B) Directs a defendant described by subparagraph (A) or (B) of
paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) who has filed a declaration stating
that the violation or violations have been corrected, or will be
corrected within 60 days of service of the complaint to file with the
court and serve on the plaintiff evidence showing correction of the
violation or violations within 10 calendar days after the completion
of the corrections.
(C) Directs a defendant described by subparagraph (C) of paragraph
(2) of subdivision (b) who has filed a declaration stating that the
violation or violations have been corrected, or will be corrected
within 30 days of service of the complaint to file with the court and
serve on the plaintiff within 10 days after issuance of the court
order evidence of correction of the violation or violations, if that
evidence showing correction was not filed previously with the
application and served on the plaintiff.
(5) Directs the parties that the CASp inspection report may be
disclosed only to the court, the parties to the action, the parties'
attorneys, those individuals employed or retained by the attorneys to
assist in the litigation, and insurance representatives or others
involved in the evaluation and settlement of the case.
(6) If the defendant so requests, directs the parties that no
later than 30 days after issuance of the court order the parties and
their counsel, accompanied by their experts if the parties so elect,
shall meet in person at the subject premises. They shall jointly
inspect the portions of the subject premises, and shall review any
programmatic or policy issues, that are claimed to constitute a
violation of a construction-related accessibility standard. The court
may allow a plaintiff who is unable to meet in person at the subject
premises to be excused from participating in a site visit or to
participate by telephone or other alternative means for good cause. A
plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel is not required, but may agree, to
attend more than one in-person site meeting. A site inspection
pursuant to this paragraph shall not affect the right of the parties
to conduct otherwise appropriate discovery.
(7) Directs the plaintiff to file with the court and serve on the
defendant at least 15 days before the date of the conference a
statement that includes, to the extent reasonably known, for use
solely for the purpose of the early evaluation conference, all of the
following:
(A) An itemized list of specific conditions on the subject
premises that are the basis of the claimed violations of
construction-related accessibility standards in the plaintiff's
complaint.
(B) The amount of damages claimed.
(C) The amount of attorney's fees and costs incurred to date, if
any, that are being claimed.
(D) Any demand for settlement of the case in its entirety.
(e) (1) A party failing to comply with any court order may be
subject to court sanction at the court's discretion.
(2) (A) The court shall lift the stay when the defendant has
failed to file and serve the CASp inspection report prior to the
early evaluation conference and has failed also to produce the report
at the time of the early evaluation conference, unless the defendant
shows good cause for that failure.
(B) The court shall lift the stay when a defendant described by
paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) has failed to file and serve the
evidence showing correction of the violation or violations as
required by law.
(3) The court may lift the stay at the conclusion of the early
evaluation conference upon a showing of good cause by the plaintiff.
Good cause may include the defendant's failure to make reasonably
timely progress toward completion of corrections noted by a CASp.
(4) The CASp inspection report filed and served pursuant to
subdivision (d) shall remain confidential throughout the stay and
shall continue to be confidential until the conclusion of the claim,
whether by dismissal, settlement, or final judgment, unless there is
a showing of good cause by any party. Good cause may include the
defendant's failure to make reasonably timely progress toward
completion of corrections noted by a CASp. The confidentiality of the
inspection report shall terminate upon the conclusion of the claim,
unless the owner of the report obtains a court order pursuant to the
California Rules of Court to seal the record.
(f) All discussions at the early evaluation conference shall be
subject to Section 1152 of the Evidence Code. It is the intent of the
Legislature that the purpose of the evaluation conference shall
include, but not be limited to, evaluation of all of the following,
as applicable:
(1) Whether the defendant is entitled to the 90-day stay for some
or all of the identified issues in the case, as a qualified
defendant.
(2) The current condition of the site and the status of any plan
of corrections, including whether the qualified defendant has
corrected or is willing to correct the alleged violations, and the
timeline for doing so.
(3) Whether subdivision (f) of Section 55.56 may be applicable to
the case, and whether all violations giving rise to the claim have
been corrected within the specified time periods.
(4) Whether the case, including any claim for damages or
injunctive relief, can be settled in whole or in part.
(5) Whether the parties should share other information that may
facilitate early evaluation and resolution of the dispute.
(g) Nothing in this section precludes any party from making an
offer to compromise pursuant to Section 998 of the Code of Civil
Procedure.
(h) For a claim involving a qualified defendant, as provided in
paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the court may schedule additional
conferences and may extend the 90-day stay for good cause shown, but
not to exceed one additional 90-day extension.
(i) Early evaluation conferences shall be conducted by a superior
court judge or commissioner, or a court early evaluation conference
officer. A commissioner shall not be qualified to conduct early
evaluation conferences pursuant to this subdivision unless he or she
has received training regarding disability access requirements
imposed by the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(Public Law 101-336; 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.), state laws that
govern access to public facilities, and federal and state regulations
adopted pursuant to those laws. For purposes of this subdivision, a
"court early evaluation conference officer" means an attorney
employed by the court who has received training regarding disability
access requirements imposed by the federal Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, state laws that govern access to public
facilities, and federal and state regulations adopted pursuant to
those laws. Attorneys serving in this capacity may also be utilized
by the court for other purposes not related to these proceedings.
(j) Nothing in this part shall be deemed to make any inspection
report, opinion, statement, or other finding or conclusion of a CASp
binding on the court, or to abrogate in any manner the ultimate
authority of the court to make all appropriate findings of fact and
law. The CASp inspection report and any opinion, statement, finding,
or conclusion therein shall be given the weight the trier of fact
finds that it deserves.
(k) Nothing in this part shall be construed to invalidate or limit
any California construction-related accessibility standard that
provides greater or equal protection for the rights of individuals
with disabilities than is afforded by the federal Americans with
Disabilities Act (Public Law 101-336; 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.)
and the federal regulations adopted pursuant to that act.
( l ) (1) The Judicial Council shall, by January 1,
2013, prepare and post on its Internet Web site instructions and a
form for use by a qualified defendant, or other defendant described
by paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), to file an application for stay
and early evaluation conference as provided in subdivisions (b) and
(c), a form for the court's notice of stay and early evaluation
conference, and any other forms appropriate to implement the
provisions relating to early evaluation conferences. Until those
forms are adopted, the Judicial Council shall post on its Internet
Web site the provisional forms set forth in subdivision (c).
(2) Until the adoption of the forms as provided in paragraph (1),
the provisional application form may be used by a defendant described
by paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
(3) In lieu of the provisions specified in number 3 of page 1 of
the application form set forth in paragraph (7) of subdivision (c),
the application shall include one of the following declarations of
the defendant as to the basis for the application, as follows:
(A) That all of the following apply to a defendant described by
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b):
(i) The site's new construction or improvement was approved
pursuant to the local building permit and inspection process on or
after January 1, 2008, and before January 1, 2016.
(ii) To the best of the defendant's knowledge there have been no
modifications or alterations completed or commenced since that
approval that impacted compliance with construction-related
accessibility standards with respect to the plaintiff's claim.
(iii) All the violations giving rise to the claim have been
corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of the complaint being
served.
(B) That all of the following apply to a defendant described by
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b):
(i) The site's new construction or improvement was approved by a
local public building department inspector who is a certified access
specialist.
(ii) To the best of the defendant's knowledge there have been no
modifications or alterations completed or commenced since that
approval that impacted
compliance with construction-related accessibility standards with
respect to the plaintiff's claim.
(iii) All the violations giving rise to the claim have been
corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days of the complaint being
served.
(C) That both of the following apply to a defendant described by
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b):
(i) The defendant is a small business described in paragraph (2)
of subdivision (f) of Section 55.56.
(ii) The violation or violations giving rise to the claim have
been corrected, or will be corrected within 30 days of the complaint
being served.
(4) In lieu of the provision specified in number 4(c) of page 1 of
the application form set forth in paragraph (7) of subdivision (c),
the application shall include a request that the court order the
defendant to do either of the following:
(A) For a defendant who has filed a declaration stating that all
violations have been corrected, or will be corrected within 60 days
of service of the complaint, file with the court and serve on the
plaintiff evidence showing correction of the violation or violations
within 10 calendar days of the completion of the corrections.
(B) For a defendant who is a small business that has filed a
declaration stating that all the violations have been corrected, or
will be corrected within 30 days of the service of the complaint,
file with the court and serve on the plaintiff evidence showing
correction of the violation or violations within 10 calendar days
after issuance of the court order, if that evidence showing
correction was not filed previously with the application and served
on the plaintiff.
(5) The Judicial Council shall also prepare and post on its
Internet Web site instructions and cover pages to assist plaintiffs
and defendants, respectively, to comply with their filing
responsibilities under subdivision (d). The cover pages shall also
provide for the party's declaration of proof of service of the
pertinent document served under the court order.
(m) The stay provisions shall not apply to any
construction-related accessibility claim in which the plaintiff has
been granted temporary injunctive relief that remains in place.
(n) This section shall not apply to any action brought by the
Attorney General, or by any district attorney, city attorney, or
county counsel.
(o) The amendments to this section made by Senate Bill 1186 of the
2011-12 Regular Session of the Legislature shall apply only to
claims filed on or after the operative date of that act. Nothing in
this part is intended to affect any complaint filed before that date.
(p) Nothing in this part is intended to affect existing law
regarding class action requirements.
SEC. 4. SEC. 5. Section 425.50 of
the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:
425.50. (a) An allegation of a construction-related accessibility
claim in a complaint, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 55.52
of the Civil Code, shall state facts sufficient to allow a
reasonable person to identify the basis of the violation or
violations supporting the claim, including all of the following:
(1) A plain language explanation of the specific access barrier or
barriers the individual encountered, or by which the individual
alleges he or she was deterred, with sufficient information about the
location of the alleged barrier to enable a reasonable person to
identify the access barrier.
(2) The way in which the barrier denied the individual full and
equal use or access, or in which it deterred the individual, on each
particular occasion.
(3) The date or dates of each particular occasion on which the
claimant encountered the specific access barrier, or on which he or
she was deterred.
(4) (A) Except in complaints that allege physical injury or damage
to property, a complaint filed by or on behalf of a high-frequency
litigant shall also state all of the following:
(i) That Whether the complaint is
filed by, or on behalf of, a high-frequency litigant.
(ii) In the case of a high-frequency litigant who is a plaintiff,
the number of complaints alleging a construction-related
accessibility claim that the high-frequency litigant has filed during
the 12 months prior to filing the complaint.
(iii) In the case of a high-frequency litigant who is a plaintiff,
the reason the individual was in the geographic area of the
defendant's business.
(iv) In the case of a high-frequency litigant who is a plaintiff,
the reason why the individual desired to access the defendant's
business, including the specific commercial, business, personal,
social, leisure, recreational, or other purpose.
(B) As used in this section "high-frequency litigant" has the same
meaning as set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 425.55.
(b) (1) A complaint alleging a
construction-related accessibility claim, as those terms are defined
in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3 of the Civil Code, shall be
verified by the plaintiff. A complaint filed without verification
shall be subject to a motion to strike.
(2) A complaint alleging a construction-related accessibility
claim filed by, or on behalf of, a high-frequency litigant shall
state in the caption "ACTION SUBJECT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL FEE IN
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 70616.5."
(c) A complaint alleging a construction-related accessibility
claim shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the
attorney's individual name, or, if the party is not represented by an
attorney, shall be signed by the party. By signing the complaint,
the attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that, to the best
of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an
inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, all of the following
conditions are met:
(1) It is not being presented primarily for an improper purpose,
such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase
in the cost of litigation.
(2) The claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are
warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the
extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the
establishment of new law.
(3) The allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary
support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have
evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further
investigation or discovery.
(4) The denials of factual contentions are warranted on the
evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a
lack of information or belief.
(d) A court may, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to
respond, determine whether subdivision (c) has been violated and, if
so, impose sanctions as provided in Section 128.7 for violations of
subdivision (b) of Section 128.7.
(e) Nothing in this section shall limit the right of a plaintiff
to amend a complaint under Section 472, or with leave of the court
under Section 473. However, an amended pleading alleging a
construction-related accessibility claim shall be pled as required by
subdivision (a).
(f) The determination whether an attorney is a high-frequency
litigant shall be made solely on the basis of the verified complaint
and any other publicly available documents. Notwithstanding any other
law, no party to the proceeding may conduct discovery with respect
to whether an attorney is a high-frequency litigant.
(f)
(g) This section shall become operative on January 1,
2013.
SEC. 5. SEC. 6. Section 425.55 is
added to the Code of Civil Procedure, to read:
425.55. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:
(1) Protection of the civil rights of persons with disabilities is
of the utmost importance to this state, and private enforcement is
the essential means of achieving that goal, as the law has been
designed.
(2) According to information from the California Commission on
Disability Access, more than one-half, or 54 percent, of all
construction-related accessibility complaints filed between 2012 and
2014 were filed by two law firms. Forty-six percent of all complaints
were filed by a total of 14 parties. Therefore, a very small number
of plaintiffs have filed a disproportionately large number of the
construction-related accessibility claims in the state, from 70 to
300 lawsuits each year. Moreover, these lawsuits are frequently filed
against small businesses on the basis of boilerplate complaints,
apparently seeking quick cash settlements rather than correction of
the accessibility violation. This practice unfairly taints the
reputation of other innocent disabled consumers who are merely trying
to go about their daily lives accessing public accommodations as
they are entitled to have full and equal access under the state's
Unruh Civil Rights Act (Section 51 of the Civil Code) and the federal
Americans with Disability Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336).
(3) Therefore, given these special and unique circumstances, the
provisions of this section are warranted for this limited group of
plaintiffs.
(b) For the purposes of this article, "high-frequency litigant"
means a person person, except as specified in
paragraph (3), who utilizes court resources in actions arising
from alleged construction-related access violations at such a high
level that it is appropriate that additional safeguards apply so as
to ensure that the claims are warranted and appropriate.
warranted. A "high-frequency litigant" means one
or more of the following:
(1) A plaintiff who has filed 10 or more complaints alleging a
construction-related accessibility violation within the 12-month
period immediately preceding the filing of the current complaint
alleging a construction-related accessibility violation.
(2) An attorney who has represented as attorney of record
10 or more high-frequency litigant plaintiffs
who were high-frequency litigants at the time when
complaints alleging construction-related accessibility violations
were filed on their behalf in actions that were
resolved within the 12-month period immediately preceding the
filing of the current complaint alleging a construction-related
accessibility violation. violation, excluding
all of the following actions:
(A) An action in which an early evaluation conference was held
pursuant to Section 55.54 of the Civil Code.
(B) An action in which judgment was entered in favor of the
plaintiff.
(C) An action in which the construction-related accessibility
violations alleged in the complaint were remedied in whole or in
part, or a favorable result was achieved, after the plaintiff filed a
complaint or provided a demand letter, as defined in Section 55.3 of
the Civil Code.
(3) This section does not apply to an attorney employed or
retained by a qualified legal services project or a qualified support
center, as defined in Section 6213 of the Business and Professions
Code, when acting within the scope of employment to represent a
client in asserting a construction-related accessibility claim, or
the client in such a case.
SEC. 6. SEC. 7. Section 68085.35 is
added to the Government Code, immediately following Section 68085.3,
to read:
68085.35. (a) Fees collected under Section 70616.5 shall be
deposited in a bank account established by the Administrative Office
of the Courts for deposit of fees collected by the courts.
(b) For each one-thousand-dollar ($1,000) fee listed in
subdivision (a), the Administrative Office of the Courts shall
distribute specified amounts as follows:
(1) Five hundred dollars ($500) to the General Fund for use, upon
appropriation by the Legislature, by the California Commission on
Disability Access.
(2) The remainder of the fee to the Trial Court Trust Fund.
(c) If any of the fees listed in subdivision (a) are reduced or
partially waived, the amount of the reduction or partial waiver shall
be deducted from the amount to be distributed to each fund in the
same proportion as the amount each distribution bears to the total
amount of the fee.
(d) No revenue collected pursuant to Section 70616.5 shall be used
to supplant existing program funding of the California Commission on
Disability Access.
SEC. 7. SEC. 8. Section 70616.5 is
added to the Government Code, to read:
70616.5. (a) In addition to the first paper filing fee required
by Section 70611 or 70613, a single high-frequency litigant fee shall
be paid to the clerk on behalf of a plaintiff who is a
high-frequency litigant, as that term is defined in Section 425.55 of
the Code of Civil Procedure, at the time of the filing of the first
paper if the complaint alleges a construction-related accessibility
claim, as those terms are defined in subdivision (a) of Section 55.3
of the Civil Code.
(b) The fee established by this section shall be one thousand
dollars ($1,000). The fee shall be transmitted as provided in Section
68085.35.
(c) Failure to pay the fees required by this section shall have
the same effect as the failure to pay a filing fee, and shall be
subject to the same enforcement and penalties.
SEC. 8. SEC. 9. The Legislature
finds and declares that Section 3 of this act limits the public's
right of access to public documents within the meaning of Section 3
of Article I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that
constitutional provision, the Legislature makes the following
findings to demonstrate the interest and the need for protecting that
interest:
(a) The interest protected by this limitation is the privacy
rights of litigants.
(b) The need for protecting those interests is to preclude the
chilling effect on litigation if public disclosure were required.
SEC. 9. SEC. 10. No reimbursement is
required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the
California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred
by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this
act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or
infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within
the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the
definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII
B of the California Constitution.
SEC. 10. SEC. 11. This act is an
urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the
public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of
the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts
constituting the necessity are:
In order to ensure that the courts are not overburdened and are
able to provide access to the judicial system for all persons seeking
redress of their construction-related accessibility claims, it is
necessary that these reasonable requirements placed on high-frequency
litigants take effect immediately.
