Bill Text: CA AB1824 | 2011-2012 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Bail.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 2-0)
Status: (Passed) 2012-09-30 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 812, Statutes of 2012. [AB1824 Detail]
Download: California-2011-AB1824-Amended.html
Bill Title: Bail.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 2-0)
Status: (Passed) 2012-09-30 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 812, Statutes of 2012. [AB1824 Detail]
Download: California-2011-AB1824-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: AB 1824 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 29, 2012 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Hagman FEBRUARY 21, 2012 An act to amendSection 3455 ofSections 1166, 1196, 1305, and 1306 of the Penal Code, relating topostrelease community supervisionbail . LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1824, as amended, Hagman.Postrelease community supervision.Bail. Existing law specifies the procedures for the forfeiture and exoneration of a bail bond, including requiring a court to direct the order of forfeiture to be vacated and the bond exonerated if the defendant appears in court within 180 days of the date of forfeiture or within 180 days of the date of mailing of a specified notice, if required. This bill would require the bond to be exonerated if the defendant appears in court, is surrendered to custody by the bail, or is arrested in the underlying case within 180 days after forfeiture and would allow 30 days from the mailing of the notice of entry of judgment to file a motion for exoneration if the defendant is surrendered by the bail outside the county where the court is located. Under existing law, where a defendant is detained beyond the jurisdiction of the court and the prosecuting agency elects not to seek extradition, the court is required to vacate the forfeiture and exonerate the bond. This bill would require exoneration of the bond if the prosecution elects not to seek extradition or transfer from a jurisdiction outside the county. The bill would also require the court, if the prosecuting agency elects to extradite the defendant, to toll the 180-day period for the time required by the prosecuting agency to obtain an extradition warrant for the defendant plus a reasonable time for the service of the warrant. Under existing law, if a general verdict is rendered against the defendant or a special verdict is given, the defendant is required to be remanded or, if on bail, committed to the county to await judgment. The bill would require remand or commitment to the county after a defendant enters a plea of guilty or is found guilty after entering a plea of nolo contendre. Existing law requires county agencies to enter each bench warrant issued on a private surety-bonded felony case into the national warrant system. If the county agency fails to do this and that failure prevents the surety or bond agent from surrendering the fugitive into custody, prevents the fugitive from being arrested or taken into custody, or results in the fugitive's subsequent release from custody, then the bail is exonerated. This bill would require the warrants in the national warrant system to be entered as fully extraditable warrants. By increasing the duties of county agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires the district attorney or county counsel, when a bond is forfeited after the 180-day period, to take specified actions, including demanding immediate payment of the judgment within 30 days after summary judgment becomes final. This bill would also make these requirements applicable to other applicable prosecuting agencies and would authorize the named agencies to enter into a court-approved resolution of the judgment of forfeiture if the motion to vacate for forfeiture or judgment is made. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.Existing law, the Postrelease Community Supervision Act of 2011, requires certain inmates released from state prison to be subject to 3 years supervision by a county agency. The act provides that if the supervising county agency has determined, following application of its assessment processes, that authorized intermediate sanctions are not appropriate, the supervising county agency is required to petition the revocation hearing officer to revoke and terminate postrelease supervision of the inmate.This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee:noyes . State-mandated local program:noyes . THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 1166 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 1166. If a general verdict is rendered against the defendant,ora special verdict is given, the defendant enters a plea of guilty, or the defendant is found guilty after entering a plea of nolo contendre he or shemustshall be remanded, if in custody, or , if on bail , he or she shall be committed to the proper officer of the county to await the judgment of the court upon the verdict, unless, upon considering the protection of the public, the seriousness of the offense charged and proven, the previous criminal record of the defendant, the probability of the defendant failing to appear for the judgment of the court upon the verdict, and public safety, the court concludes the evidence supports its decision to allow the defendant to remain out on bail. When committed, his or her bailisshall be exonerated,or , if money is deposited instead of bail , itmustshall be refunded to the defendant or to the person or persons found by the court to have depositedsaidthe money on behalf ofsaidthe defendant. SEC. 2. Section 1196 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 1196. (a) The clerkmustshall , at any time after the order, issue a bench warrant into one or more counties. (b) The clerk shall require the appropriate agency to enter each bench warrant issued on a private surety-bonded felony case into the national warrant system (National Crime Information Center (NCIC)). If the appropriate agency fails to enter the bench warrant into the national warrant system (NCIC) as a fully extraditable warrant , and the court finds that this failure prevented the surety or bond agent from surrendering the fugitive into custody, prevented the fugitive from being arrested or taken into custody, or resulted in the fugitive's subsequent release from custody, the court having jurisdiction over the bail shall, upon petition, set aside the forfeiture of the bond and declare all liability on the bail bond to be exonerated. SEC. 3. Section 1305 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 1305. (a) A court shall in open court declare forfeited the undertaking of bail or the money or property deposited as bail if, without sufficient excuse, a defendant fails to appear for any of the following: (1) Arraignment. (2) Trial. (3) Judgment. (4) Any other occasion prior to the pronouncement of judgment if the defendant's presence in court is lawfully required. (5) To surrender himself or herself in execution of the judgment after appeal. However, the court shall not have jurisdiction to declare a forfeiture and the bail shall be released of all obligations under the bond if the case is dismissed or if no complaint is filed within 15 days from the date of arraignment. (b) (1) If the amount of the bond or money or property deposited exceeds four hundred dollars ($400), the clerk of the court shall, within 30 days of the forfeiture, mail notice of the forfeiture to the surety or the depositor of money posted instead of bail. At the same time, the court shall mail a copy of the forfeiture notice to the bail agent whose name appears on the bond. The clerk shall also execute a certificate of mailing of the forfeiture notice and shall place the certificate in the court's file. If the notice of forfeiture is required to be mailed pursuant to this section, the 180-day period provided for in this section shall be extended by a period of five days to allow for the mailing.If(2) If the surety is an authorized corporate surety, and if the bond plainly displays the mailing address of the corporate surety and the bail agent, then notice of the forfeiture shall be mailed to the surety at that address and to the bail agent, and mailing alone to the surety or the bail agent shall not constitute compliance with this section.The(3) The surety or depositor shall be released of all obligations under the bond if any of the following conditions apply:(1)(A) The clerk fails to mail the notice of forfeiture in accordance with this section within 30 days after the entry of the forfeiture.(2)(B) The clerk fails to mail the notice of forfeiture to the surety at the address printed on the bond.(3)(C) The clerk fails to mail a copy of the notice of forfeiture to the bail agent at the address shown on the bond. (c) (1)If the defendant appears either voluntarily or in custody after surrender or arrest in court within 180 days of the date of forfeiture or within 180 days of the date of mailing of the notice if the notice is required under subdivision (b),If, within the county where the case is located, the defendant appears in court, is surrendered to custody by the bail, or is arrested in the underlying case within 180 days of the date of forfeiture, the court shall, on its own motion at the time the defendant first appears in court on the case in which the forfeiture was entered, direct the order of forfeiture to be vacated and the bond exonerated. If the court fails to so act on its own motion, then the surety's or depositor's obligations under the bond shall be immediately vacated and the bond exonerated. An order vacating the forfeiture and exonerating the bond may be made on terms that are just and do not exceed the terms imposed in similar situations with respect to other forms of pretrial release. (2) If, within the county where the case is located, the defendant is surrendered to custody by the bail or is arrested in the underlying case within the 180-day period, and is subsequently released from custody prior to an appearance in court, the court shall, on its own motion, direct the order of forfeiture to be vacated and the bond exonerated. If the court fails to so act on its own motion, then the surety's or depositor's obligations under the bond shall be immediately vacated and the bond exonerated. An order vacating the forfeiture and exonerating the bond may be made on terms that are just and do not exceed the terms imposed in similar situations with respect to other forms of pretrial release. (3) If, outside the county where the case is located, either foreign or domestic, the defendant is surrendered to custody by the bail or is arrested in the underlying case within the 180-day period, the court shall vacate the forfeiture and exonerate the bail. Notwithstanding subdivision (i), a motion for exoneration brought under this paragraph may be filed within 30 days of the mailing of the notice of entry of judgment pursuant to Section 1306. (4) In lieu of exonerating the bond, the court may order the bail reinstated and the defendant released on the same bond if both of the following conditions are met: (A) The bail is given prior notice of the reinstatement. (B) The bail has not surrendered the defendant. (d) In the case of a permanent disability, the court shall direct the order of forfeiture to be vacated and the bail or money or property deposited as bail exonerated if, within 180 days of the date of forfeiture or within 180 days of the date of mailing of the notice if notice is required under subdivision (b), it is made apparent to the satisfaction of the court that both of the following conditions are met: (1) The defendant is deceased or otherwise permanently unable to appear in the court due to illness, insanity, or detention by military or civil authorities. (2) The absence of the defendant is without the connivance of the bail. (e) In the case of a temporary disability, the court shall order the tolling of the 180-day period provided in this section during the period of temporary disability, provided that it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the following conditions are met: (1) The defendant is temporarily disabled by reason of illness, insanity, or detention by military or civil authorities. (2) Based upon the temporary disability, the defendant is unable to appear in court during the remainder of the 180-day period. (3) The absence of the defendant is without the connivance of the bail. The period of the tolling shall be extended for a reasonable period of time, at the discretion of the court, after the cessation of the disability to allow for the return of the defendant to the jurisdiction of the court. (f) In all cases where a defendant is in custodybeyond the jurisdiction of the court that ordered the bail forfeitedoutside the county where the case is located , and the prosecuting agency elects not to seek extradition or transfer after being informed of the location of the defendant, the court shall vacate the forfeiture and exonerate the bond on terms that are just and do not exceed the terms imposed in similar situations with respect to other forms of pretrial release. If the prosecuting agency elects to extradite the defendant, the court shall toll the 180-day time period for the time required by the prosecuting agency to obtain an extradition warrant for the defendant plus a reasonable time for the service of t he warrant. (g) In all cases of forfeiture where a defendant is not in custody and is beyond the jurisdiction of the state, is temporarily detained, by the bail agent, in the presence of a local law enforcement officer of the jurisdiction in which the defendant is located, and is positively identified by that law enforcement officer as the wanted defendant in an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury, and the prosecuting agency elects not to seek extradition after being informed of the location of the defendant, the court shall vacate the forfeiture and exonerate the bond on terms that are just and do not exceed the terms imposed in similar situations with respect to other forms of pretrial release. If the prosecuting agency elects to extradite the defendant, the court shall toll the 180-day time period for the time required by the prosecuting agency to obtain an extradition warrant for the defendant plus a reasonable time for the service of the warrant. (h) As used in this section, "arrest" includes a hold placed on the defendant in the underlying case while he or she is in custody on other charges. (i) A motion filed in a timely manner within the 180-day period may be heard within 30 days of the expiration of the 180-day period. The court may extend the 30-day period upon a showing of good cause. The motion may be made by the surety insurer, the bail agent, the surety, or the depositor of money or property, any of whom may appear in person or through an attorney. The court, in its discretion, may require that the moving party provide 10 days prior notice to the applicable prosecuting agency, as a condition precedent to granting the motion. SEC. 4. Section 1306 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 1306. (a) Whenanya bond is forfeited and the period of time specified in Section 1305 has elapsed without the forfeiture having been set aside, the courtwhichthat has declared the forfeiture, regardless of the amount of the bail, shall enter a summary judgment against each bondsman named in the bond in the amount for which the bondsman is bound. The judgment shall be the amount of the bond plus costs, and notwithstanding any other law, no penalty assessments shall be levied or added to the judgment. (b) If a court grants relief from bail forfeiture, it shall impose a monetary payment as a condition of relief to compensate the people for the costs of returning a defendant to custody pursuant to Section 1305, except for cases where the court determines that in the best interest of justice no costs should be imposed. The amount imposed shall reflect the actual costs of returning the defendant to custody. Failure to act within the required time to make the payment imposed pursuant to this subdivision shall not be the basis for a summary judgment against any or all of the underlying amount of the bail. A summary judgment entered for failure to make the payment imposed under this subdivision is subject to the provisions of Section 1308, and shall apply only to the amount of the costs owing at the time the summary judgment is entered, plus administrative costs and interests. (c) If, because of the failure ofanya court to promptly perform the duties enjoined upon it pursuant to this section, summary judgment is not entered within 90 days after the date upon which it may first be entered, the right to do so expires and the bail is exonerated. (d) A dismissal of the complaint, indictment, or information after the default of the defendant shall not release or affect the obligation of the bail bond or undertaking. (e) The district attorneyor, county counsel , or applicable prosecuting agency shall: (1) Demand immediate payment of the judgment within 30 days after the summary judgment becomes final. (2) If the judgment remains unpaid for a period of 20 days after demand has been made, shall forthwith enforce the judgment in the manner provided for enforcement of money judgments generally. If the judgment is appealed by the surety or bondsman, the undertaking required to be given in these cases shall be provided by a surety other than the one filing the appeal. The undertaking shall comply with the enforcement requirements of Section 917.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (3) If a motion to vacate forfeiture or judgment is made, be authorized to enter into a court-approved resolution of the judgment or forfeiture. (f) The right to enforce a summary judgment entered against a bondsman pursuant to this section shall expire two years after the entry of the judgment. SEC. 5. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.SECTION 1.Section 3455 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 3455. (a) If the supervising county agency has determined, following application of its assessment processes, that intermediate sanctions as authorized in subdivision (b) of Section 3454 are not appropriate, the supervising county agency shall petition the revocation hearing officer appointed pursuant to Section 71622.5 of the Government Code to revoke and terminate postrelease supervision. At any point during the process initiated pursuant to this section, a person may waive, in writing, his or her right to counsel, admit the violation of his or her postrelease supervision, waive a court hearing, and accept the proposed modification of his or her postrelease supervision. The petition shall include a written report that contains additional information regarding the petition, including the relevant terms and conditions of postrelease supervision, the circumstances of the alleged underlying violation, the history and background of the violator, and any recommendations. The Judicial Council shall adopt forms and rules of court to establish uniform statewide procedures to implement this subdivision, including the minimum contents of supervision agency reports. Upon a finding that the person has violated the conditions of postrelease supervision, the revocation hearing officer shall have authority to do all of the following: (1) Return the person to postrelease supervision with modifications of conditions, if appropriate, including a period of incarceration in county jail. (2) Revoke postrelease supervision and order the person to confinement in the county jail. (3) Refer the person to a reentry court pursuant to Section 3015 or other evidence-based program in the court's discretion. (4) At any time during the period of postrelease supervision, if a peace officer has probable cause to believe a person subject to postrelease community supervision is violating any term or condition of his or her release, the officer may, without a warrant or other process, arrest the person and bring him or her before the supervising county agency established by the county board of supervisors pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 3451. Additionally, an officer employed by the supervising county agency may seek a warrant and a court or its designated hearing officer appointed pursuant to Section 71622.5 of the Government Code shall have the authority to issue a warrant for that person's arrest. (5) The court or its designated hearing officer shall have the authority to issue a warrant for a person who is the subject of a petition filed under this section who has failed to appear for a hearing on the petition or for any reason in the interests of justice, or to remand to custody a person who does appear at a hearing on the petition for any reason in the interests of justice. (b) The revocation hearing shall be held within a reasonable time after the filing of the revocation petition. Based upon a showing of a preponderance of the evidence that a person under supervision poses an unreasonable risk to public safety, or that the person may not appear if released from custody, or for any reason in the interests of justice, the supervising county agency shall have the authority to make a determination whether the person should remain in custody pending a revocation hearing, and upon that determination, may order the person confined pending a revocation hearing. (c) Confinement pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (a) shall not exceed a period of 180 days in a county jail. (d) A person shall not remain under supervision or in custody pursuant to this title on or after three years from the date of the person's initial entry onto postrelease supervision, except when a bench or arrest warrant has been issued by a court or its designated hearing officer and the person has not appeared. During the time the warrant is outstanding the supervision period shall be tolled and when the person appears before the court or its designated hearing officer the supervision period may be extended for a period equivalent to the time tolled.