Bill Text: CA AB226 | 2009-2010 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: County employees retirement: compensation.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-0)
Status: (Vetoed) 2010-09-30 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB226 Detail]
Download: California-2009-AB226-Amended.html
Bill Title: County employees retirement: compensation.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-0)
Status: (Vetoed) 2010-09-30 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB226 Detail]
Download: California-2009-AB226-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: AB 226 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 20, 2010 AMENDED IN SENATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 23, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 26, 2009 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 16, 2009 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 6, 2009 INTRODUCED BY Assembly MemberRuskinTorrico(Coauthor:Assembly MemberSaldana)FEBRUARY 4, 2009An act to add Section 30821 to the Public Resources Code, relating to coastal resources.An act to add Sections 31485.18 and 31676.2 to the Government Code, relating to county employees' retirement. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 226, as amended,RuskinTorrico .Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: enforcement.County employees retirement: compensation. Under existing law, counties and districts may provide retirement benefits to their employees pursuant to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL). CERL specifies the minimum ages and years of service that are required in order to become eligible for retirement. That law generally permits the board of supervisors of a county or the governing board of a district, by resolution adopted by majority vote and pursuant to a memorandum of understanding, as specified, to make certain formulas for the calculation of benefits for its members based on their classification. The bill would provide that compensation paid to a retiring member to restore compensation the member would have been entitled to receive pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement fully executed on or before July 1, 2010, that was subsequently deferred or otherwise modified as a result of a concessionary amendment executed prior to September 1, 2010, shall be considered compensation earnable and not be deemed to have been paid for the purpose of enhancing a member's retirement benefit. This bill would authorize the board of supervisors of the County of Sacramento, by resolution, adopted by majority vote, as part of a negotiated memorandum of understanding with a bargaining unit that represents safety members to require safety employees of that bargaining unit and unrepresented safety employees, first hired after approval of the resolution, to receive a specified pension calculation that applies to safety members and that computes final compensation based upon the average annual compensation earnable during a specified 3-year period.The California Coastal Act of 1976 requires a person undertaking development in the coastal zone to obtain a coastal development permit in accordance with prescribed procedures. Existing law authorizes the superior court to impose civil liability on a person who performs or undertakes development that is in violation of the act or that is inconsistent with a previously issued coastal development permit, and on a person who violates the act in any other manner and authorizes a person to maintain an action for recovery of these civil penalties.This bill would provide that a person who violates the act is subject to an administrative civil penalty that may be imposed by the California Coastal Commission by a majority vote of the commissioners, upon consideration of various factors, in a public hearing, as specified, in an amount no less than $5,000 and no more than $50,000 for each violation.This bill would provide that a person, as defined, shall not be subject to both monetary civil liability imposed by the commission and monetary civil liability imposed by the superior court for the same act or failure to act. In the event that a person who is assessed a penalty by the commission fails to pay the penalty, fails to comply with a restoration or cease and desist order, or challenges any of these actions in a court of law, the commission may maintain an action or otherwise engage in judicial proceedings to enforce those requirements and the court may grant any relief, as specified. This bill would also allow the commission to record a lien on the property of a violator in the amount of the penalty assessed by the commission if the violator fails to pay the fine.Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee:yesno . State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 31485.18 is added to the Government Code , to read: 31485.18. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, in a county of the eighth class, as defined in Sections 28020 and 28025, as amended by Chapter 1204 of the Statutes of 1971, the board of supervisors may, by resolution adopted by majority vote, as part of any negotiated memorandum of understanding with a bargaining unit that represents safety employees, require a safety employee of that bargaining unit, and may also require an unrepresented safety employee, first hired after approval of the resolution, to receive a pension calculation provided in Section 31664.2, with a highest compensation period determined pursuant to Section 31462, and with a cost-of-living-adjustment provided in Section 31870. (b) The resolution described in subdivision (a) may provide a different formula or calculation of retirement benefits for new safety members in one bargaining unit or new unrepresented safety members than that provided for new safety members of other bargaining units or new unrepresented safety members. SEC. 2. Section 31676.2 is added to the Government Code , to read: 31676.2. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter, compensation paid to a retiring member to restore payrate or salary the member would have been entitled to receive pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement fully executed on or before July 1, 2010, that was subsequently deferred or otherwise modified as a result of a concessionary amendment executed prior to September 1, 2010, shall be considered compensation earnable and not be deemed to have been paid for the purpose of enhancing a member's retirement benefit.SECTION 1.Section 30821 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: 30821. (a) In addition to any other penalties imposed pursuant to this division, a person, including a landowner, who is in violation of a provision of this division is subject to an administrative civil penalty that may be imposed by the commission in an amount not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) and not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each violation. (b) All penalties imposed pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be imposed by majority vote of the commissioners present in a duly noticed public hearing in compliance with the requirements of Section 30810, 30811, or 30812. (c) In determining the amount of civil liability, the commission shall take into account the factors set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 30820. (d) A person shall not be subject to both monetary civil liability imposed under this section and monetary civil liability imposed by the superior court for the same act or failure to act. In the event that a person who is assessed a penalty under this section fails to pay the administrative penalty, otherwise fails to comply with a restoration or cease and desist order issued by the commission in connection with the penalty action, or challenges any of these actions by the commission in a court of law, the commission may maintain an action or otherwise engage in judicial proceedings to enforce those requirements and the court may grant any relief as provided under this chapter. (e) If a person fails to pay a penalty imposed by the commission pursuant to this section, the commission may record a lien on the property in the amount of the penalty assessed by the commission. This lien shall have the force, effect, and priority of a judgment lien. (f) In enacting this section, it is not the intent of the Legislature that unintentional, minor violations that only cause de minimis harm should lead to civil penalties, if the violator has acted expeditiously to correct the violation consistent with this act. (g) "Person," for the purpose of this section, does not include a local government, a special district, or an agency thereof when acting in a legislative or adjudicative capacity.