Bill Text: CA AB3068 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Enrolled
Bill Title: Adaptive reuse: streamlining: incentives.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)
Status: (Vetoed) 2024-09-27 - Vetoed by Governor. [AB3068 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB3068-Enrolled.html
|
Enrolled
September 05, 2024 |
|
Passed
IN
Senate
August 30, 2024 |
|
Passed
IN
Assembly
August 31, 2024 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
August 23, 2024 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
July 03, 2024 |
|
Amended
IN
Senate
June 12, 2024 |
|
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 18, 2024 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 3068
| Introduced by Assembly Member Haney (Coauthor: Assembly Member Quirk-Silva) |
February 16, 2024 |
An act to add Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 51299) to Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of, and to add Article 11.5 (commencing with Section 65658) to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of, the Government Code, relating to housing.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 3068, Haney.
Adaptive reuse: streamlining: incentives.
The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development, and the development of certain lands outside its boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. That law allows a development proponent to submit an application for a development that is subject to a specified streamlined, ministerial approval process not subject to a conditional use permit, if the development satisfies certain objective planning standards, including that the development is a multifamily housing development that contains two or more residential units.
This bill would deem an adaptive reuse project a use by right in all zones, regardless of the zoning of the site, and subject to a streamlined, ministerial review process if the project meets specified
requirements, subject to specified exceptions. In this regard, an adaptive reuse project, in order to qualify for the streamlined, ministerial review process, would be required to be proposed for an existing building that is less than 50 years old or meets certain requirements regarding the preservation of historic resources, including the signing of an affidavit declaring that the project will comply with the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation for, among other things, the preservation of exterior facades of a building that face a street, or receive federal or state historic rehabilitation tax credits, as specified. The bill would require an adaptive reuse project to meet specified affordability criteria. In this regard, the bill would require an adaptive reuse project for rental housing to include either 8% of the unit for very low income households and 5% of the units for extremely low income households or 15% of the units for lower income
households. For an adaptive reuse project for owner-occupied housing, the bill would require the development to offer either 30% of the units at an affordable housing cost to moderate-income households or 15% of the units at an affordable housing cost to lower income households. The bill would require at least one-half of the square footage of the adaptive reuse project to be dedicated to residential uses. The bill would provide, among other things relating to projects involving adaptive reuse, that parking is not required for the portion of a project consisting of a building subject to adaptive reuse that does not have existing onsite parking. The bill would authorize an adaptive reuse project subject to these provisions to include the development of new residential or mixed-use structures on undeveloped areas and parking areas located on the same parcel as the proposed repurposed building, or on the parcels adjacent to the proposed adaptive reuse project site if certain conditions are met.
The bill would authorize a local government to adopt an ordinance, as specified, to, among other things, specify the process and requirements applicable to adaptive reuse projects, as specified, and would require an adaptive reuse project to comply with all objective planning standards found in the ordinance. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions relating to adaptive reuse projects is intended to preempt the adoption or implementation of a local ordinance that provides alternative procedures and substantive requirements for adaptive reuse projects, provided that the
local ordinance does not prohibit an applicant from electing to pursue an adaptive reuse project, as specified. The bill would require a local agency that has not adopted an above-described ordinance to ministerially without discretionary review approve or disapprove applications for a permit to create or serve an adaptive reuse project, as specified. The bill would, if a local government’s planning director or equivalent position determines that the adaptive reuse project submitted pursuant to these provisions is consistent with the objective planning standards, require the local government to approve the adaptive reuse project within specified
timeframes. The bill would require the local government staff or relevant local planning and permitting department, upon determining that the adaptive reuse project is in conflict with any of the objective planning standards, to provide the proponent written documentation of, among other things, which standard or standards the development conflicts with within specific timeframes. The bill would prohibit a local government from imposing any local development standard on any project that is an adaptive reuse that would require alteration of the existing building envelope, except as specified, whether or not the local government has adopted an ordinance.
The bill would require the proponent of an adaptive reuse project subject to these provisions to
certify to the local government that specified labor prevailing wage, apprenticeship, skilled and training workforce, and health care expenditure requirements are satisfied, as specified. The bill would authorize the locality, and any labor standards enforcement agency the locality lawfully maintains, to issue a stop notice to halt further work on the project if work is proceeding in violation of any of the above-described labor standards, as specified, and to revoke a building permit if the general contractor does not show that those standards were followed.
By requiring local governments to implement the streamlined, ministerial review process for adaptive reuse projects, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. By requiring certain
development proponents of an adaptive reuse project to sign an affidavit regarding the preservation of historic resources and requiring development proponents to certify compliance with certain labor standards under penalty of perjury, the bill would expand the crime of perjury and therefore impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would exempt an adaptive reuse project from all impact fees that are not reasonably related to the impacts resulting from the change of use of the site from nonresidential to residential or mixed use and would require any fees charged to be roughly proportional to the difference in impacts caused by the change of use.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on
the environment. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.
This bill, by establishing the streamlined, ministerial review process described above, would exempt the approval of adaptive reuse projects subject to those processes from CEQA. The bill would also exempt specified findings regarding industrial uses and ordinances adopted to implement specified provisions from CEQA.
This bill would authorize a city or county, or city and county, commencing in the 2024–25 fiscal year, to establish an adaptive reuse investment incentive program to pay adaptive reuse investment incentive funds to the proponent of an adaptive reuse project approved pursuant to the streamlined, ministerial process described above for up to 30 consecutive fiscal years, as specified. The bill would define “adaptive reuse investment incentive funds” to mean an amount up to or equal to the amount of ad valorem property tax revenue
allocated to the participating local agency from the taxation of that portion of the total assessed value of the real and personal property of an adaptive reuse project property that is in excess of the qualified adaptive reuse project property’s valuation at the time of the proponent’s initial request for funding.
The bill would define terms for these purposes, and would make findings and declarations related to its provisions.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YESBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Converting vacant commercial space into residential housing, through adaptive reuse, could reduce underutilized and vacant buildings that have been decreasing in value, thereby helping to stabilize the commercial real estate market and filling those spaces with more valuable tax-generating uses.
(b) Adaptive reuse projects can increase activity and foot traffic in neighborhoods across the state, which helps support local businesses and enhance the cultural life of cities and towns.
(c) Adaptive reuse projects create new construction jobs and
preserve historic structures.
(d) Adaptive reuse projects are more environmentally friendly than new construction by repurposing existing materials, reducing transportation emissions, and preserving embodied carbon.
(e) New housing construction, at all affordability levels, can help to mitigate, and eventually reverse, the statewide housing shortage.
SEC. 2.
Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 51299) is added to Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code, to read:CHAPTER 9. Adaptive Reuse Investment Incentive Program
51299.
It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide cities and counties with opportunities to adaptively reuse existing buildings, such as office buildings, in order to facilitate their conversion to housing and mixed uses.51299.1.
For purposes of this chapter:(a) “Adaptive reuse investment incentive funds” means, with respect to a qualified adaptive reuse project property for a relevant fiscal year, an amount up to or equal to the amount of ad valorem property tax revenue allocated to the participating local agency, excluding the revenue transfers required by Sections 97.2 and 97.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, from the taxation of that portion of the total assessed value of the real and personal property of an adaptive reuse project property that is in excess of the qualified adaptive reuse project property’s valuation at the time of the proponent’s initial request for funding.
(b) “Program” means an adaptive reuse
investment incentive program established pursuant to Section 51299.2.
(c) (1) “Proponent” means a party or parties that meet all of the following criteria:
(A) The party is named in the application for a permit to construct a qualified adaptive reuse project submitted to the city or county.
(B) The party will be the fee owner of the qualified adaptive reuse project property upon the completion of that development.
(2) If a proponent that is receiving adaptive reuse investment incentive amounts subsequently leases the qualified adaptive reuse project property to another party, the lease may provide for the payment to that lessee of any portion of adaptive reuse investment incentive
funds. A lessee that receives any portion of adaptive reuse investment incentive funds shall also be considered a proponent for the purposes of this chapter.
(d) “Qualified adaptive reuse project property” means an adaptive reuse project proposed pursuant to Article 11.5 (commencing with Section 65658) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 that is located within the city or county.
51299.2.
(a) Commencing in the 2024–25 fiscal year, the governing body of a city or county, or city and county, may, by ordinance or resolution, establish an adaptive reuse investment incentive program pursuant to this chapter.(b) (1) A city or county, or city and county, that establishes a program shall, upon the approval by a majority of the entire membership of its governing body of a written request therefor, pay adaptive reuse investment incentive funds to the proponent of a qualified adaptive reuse project property to subsidize the affordable housing units, as required pursuant to Article 11.5 (commencing with Section 65658) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7, for up to 30 consecutive fiscal years. Nothing in this
paragraph shall prohibit a city or county, or city and county, from paying adaptive reuse investment incentive funds to a proponent pursuant to this paragraph for a period of fewer than 30 years.
(2) A request for the payment of adaptive reuse investment incentive funds shall be filed by a proponent in writing with the governing body of the city or county in the time and manner established by that governing body.
(c) After a city or county, or city and county, approves a request for the payment of adaptive reuse investment incentive funds, payment of adaptive reuse investment incentive funds shall begin with the first fiscal year that commences after the qualified adaptive reuse property is issued a certificate of occupancy.
51299.3.
A city or special district may pay to the city or county, or city and county, an amount equal to the amount of ad valorem property tax revenue allocated to that city or special district, but not the actual allocation, derived from the taxation of that portion of the total assessed value of that real property that is in excess of the property’s valuation at the time of the proponent’s initial request for funding, for the purpose of subsidizing the affordable housing units required pursuant to Article 11.5 (commencing with Section 65658) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7.SEC. 3.
Article 11.5 (commencing with Section 65658) is added to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, to read:Article 11.5. Office to Housing Conversion Act
65658.
This article may be cited as the Office to Housing Conversion Act.65658.1.
For purposes of this article:(a) (1) “Adaptive reuse project” means the retrofitting and repurposing of an existing building to create new residential or mixed uses including office conversion projects.
(2) “Adaptive reuse project” shall not include any of the following:
(A) The retrofitting and repurposing of any industrial use, unless the planning director or equivalent position finds, based on substantial evidence in the record, that the building is no longer economically viable for industrial use or uses. A finding described in
this subparagraph that a building for industrial use is no longer economically viable shall not be considered a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
(B) The retrofitting and repurposing of any hotels, or any mixed-use buildings that contain hotel use, except if they have been discontinued for a minimum of five years from the date on which this article becomes operative.
(b) “Adjacent portion of the project” means the portion of the project located on a site adjacent to and attached to
the proposed repurposed existing building, including on the same parcel as the proposed repurposed existing building.
(c) “Broadly applicable housing affordability requirement” means a local ordinance or other regulation that requires a minimum percentage of affordable units and that applies to a variety of housing development types or entitlement pathways.
(d) “Impact fee” means any fee imposed pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000).
(e) “Industrial use” means utilities, manufacturing, transportation storage and maintenance facilities, warehousing uses, and any other use that is a source that is subject to permitting by a district, as defined in Section 39025 of the Health and Safety Code, pursuant to Division 26
(commencing with Section 39000) of the Health and Safety Code or the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7401 et seq.). “Industrial use” does not include any of the following:
(1) Power substations or utility conveyances such as power lines, broadband wires, and pipes.
(2) A use where the only source permitted by a district is an emergency backup generator.
(3) Self-storage for the residents of a building.
(f) “Historical resource” means the same as defined in subdivision (j) of Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or a resource listed in the California Register of Historical Resources as described in Section 5024.1 of the Public Resources Code.
(g) “Local affordable housing requirement” means either of the following:
(1) A local government requirement that a housing development project include a certain
percentage of units affordable to, and occupied by, extremely low, very low, lower, or moderate-income households as a condition of development of residential units.
(2) A local government requirement allowing a housing development project to be a use by right if the project includes a certain percentage of units affordable to, and occupied by, extremely low, very low, lower, or moderate-income households as a condition of development of residential units.
(h) “Local government” means a city, including a charter city, a county,
including a charter county, or a city and county, including a charter city and county.
(i) “Mixed use” means residential uses combined with at least one other land use, but not including any industrial use.
(j) “Office conversion project” means the conversion of a building used for office purposes or a vacant office building into residential dwelling units.
(k) “Persons and families of low or moderate income” means the same as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.
(l) “Phase I environmental assessment” means the same as defined in Section 78090 of the Health and Safety Code.
(m) “Phase II environmental assessment” means the same as defined in Section 25403 of the Health and Safety Code.
(n) “Preliminary endangerment assessment” means the same as defined in Section 78095 of the Health and Safety Code.
(o) “Project labor agreement” has the same meaning as set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 2500 of the Public Contract Code.
(p) “Residential uses” includes, but is not limited to, housing units, dormitories, boarding houses, group housing, and other congregate residential
uses. “Residential uses” does not include prisons or jails.
(q) “Urban uses” has the same meaning as defined in Section 65912.101.
(r) “Use by right” means that the city’s or county’s review of the adaptive reuse project may not require a conditional use permit, planned unit development
permit, or other discretionary city or county review or approval that would constitute a “project” for purposes of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code. Any subdivision of the sites shall be subject to all laws, including, but not limited to, a city or county ordinance implementing the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410)).
65658.3.
(a) A local government may adopt an ordinance to implement this article and specify the process and requirements applicable to adaptive reuse projects, provided that the ordinance is consistent with, and does not inhibit the objectives of, this article.(b) An ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall not be considered a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code).
(c) A local agency that has not adopted an ordinance governing adaptive reuse pursuant to subdivision (a) shall ministerially without discretionary review approve or disapprove applications the local agency receives for a
permit to create or serve an adaptive reuse project pursuant to this article.
(d) Notwithstanding Section 65455, any zoning ordinance authorizing adaptive reuse projects may be adopted or amended even if it is inconsistent with the adopted specific plan, and any conflicting provisions authorizing adaptive reuse projects in the zoning ordinance shall supersede the conflicted provisions in the specific plan.
(e) Nothing in this article is intended to preempt the adoption and implementation of a local ordinance that provides alternative procedures and substantive requirements for adaptive reuse projects, provided that the local ordinance does not prohibit an applicant from electing to pursue an
adaptive reuse project under this article or under any ordinance adopted to implement this article.
65658.4.
The Legislature finds and declares that this article addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this article applies to all cities, including charter cities.65658.5.
(a) An adaptive reuse project that meets the requirements of subdivision (b) shall be deemed a use by right in all zones, regardless of the zoning of the site, and subject to the streamlined, ministerial review process described in Section 65658.8, except that both of the following conditions apply:(1) Any nonresidential uses of a proposed mixed-use adaptive reuse
project shall be consistent with the land uses allowed by the zoning or a continuation of an existing zoning nonconforming use.
(2) Any tourist hotel uses of a proposed adaptive reuse project shall be subject to the existing approval processes required by that local jurisdiction.
(b) An adaptive reuse project shall comply with all of the following requirements:
(1) The adaptive reuse project and the site on which it is located shall satisfy both of the following:
(A) It is a legal parcel or parcels located in a city if, and only if, the city boundaries include some portion of
an urbanized area, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel or parcels wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area, as designated by the United States Census Bureau.
(B) At least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins parcels that are developed with urban uses. For the purposes of this section, parcels that are separated by a street, highway, or any other
right-of-way shall be considered to be adjoined.
(2) The adaptive reuse project is proposed for any of the following, as applicable:
(A) The project is proposed for an existing building that is less than 50 years old.
(B) The project is proposed for an existing building that is listed on a local, state, or federal register of historic resources and the adaptive reuse project proponent complies with Section 65658.7.
(C) The project is proposed for an existing building that is more than 50 years old and the local government has evaluated the site through a preliminary application submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 65658.7 and either of the following are satisfied:
(i) The local government determines that the building or site is a historic resource and the adaptive reuse project proponent complies with Section 65658.7.
(ii) The local government determines that the building or site is not a historic resource.
(3) The adaptive reuse project meets the following affordability criteria, as applicable:
(A) (i) An adaptive reuse project for rental housing shall include either of the following:
(I) Eight percent of the units for very low income households and 5 percent of the units for extremely low income households.
(II) Fifteen percent of the units for lower income households.
(ii) The development proponent shall agree to, and the local government shall require, the continued affordability of all affordable rental units included pursuant to this subdivision through a recorded affordability restriction for a period of 55 years. Rents shall be set at an affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code.
(B) (i) An adaptive reuse project for owner-occupied housing shall comply with either of the following:
(I) Thirty percent of the units shall be offered at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, to moderate-income households.
(II) Fifteen percent of the units shall be offered at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of
the Health and Safety Code, to lower income households.
(ii) The development proponent shall agree to, and the local government shall require, the continued affordability of all affordable ownership units through a recorded affordability restriction for a period of 45 years.
(C) If the local government has a local affordable housing requirement, the housing development project shall comply with all of the following:
(i) The development project shall include the percentage of affordable units required by this section or the local requirement, whichever is higher.
(ii) The development project shall meet the lowest income targeting required by either this section or the local requirement.
(iii) If the local affordable housing requirement requires greater than 15 percent of the units to be dedicated for lower income households and does not require the inclusion of units affordable to very low and extremely low income households, then the rental housing development shall do both of the following:
(I) Include 8 percent of the units for very low income households and 5 percent of the units for extremely low income households.
(II) Fifteen percent of units affordable to lower income households shall be subtracted from the percentage of units required by the local policy at the highest required affordability level.
(D) Affordable units in the development project shall have the same bedroom and bathroom count ratio as the market rate units, be equitably distributed within the project, and have the
same type or quality of appliances, fixtures, and finishes.
(4) If the adaptive reuse project includes mixed uses, at least one-half of the square footage of the adaptive reuse project shall be dedicated to residential uses. For purposes of this subparagraph, square footage of the project does not include underground space, including basements or underground parking garages.
(5) (A) The local government shall, as a condition of approval of the development, require the development proponent to complete a Phase I environmental assessment.
(B) If a recognized environmental condition is found, the development proponent shall undertake a preliminary endangerment assessment, as defined in Section 78095 of the Health and Safety Code, prepared by an environmental assessor to determine the existence of
any release of a hazardous substance on the site and to determine the potential for exposure of future occupants to significant health hazards from any nearby property or activity.
(i) If a release of a hazardous substance is found to exist on the site, before the local government issues a certificate of occupancy, the release shall be removed, or any significant effects of the release shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with current state and federal requirements.
(ii) If a potential for exposure to significant hazards from surrounding properties or activities is found to exist, before the local government issues a certificate of occupancy, the effects of the potential exposure shall be mitigated to a level of insignificance in compliance with current state and federal requirements.
(6) (A) The adaptive reuse project complies with all objective planning standards found in an ordinance adopted pursuant to Section 65658.3.
(B) A local government shall not impose any local development standard on any project that is an adaptive reuse project pursuant to this article that would require alteration of the existing building envelope, except if required by any applicable local building code, regardless of whether the local government has adopted an ordinance pursuant to Section 65658.3.
(7) The acreage of the project site is 20 acres or less.
(c) An adaptive
reuse project that meets all the requirements of subdivision (b) may include rooftop structures that exceed any applicable height limitation imposed by the local government, provided that the rooftop structure does not exceed one story and is used for shared amenities or equipment, including, but not limited to, shared cooking facilities, exercise facilities, common area lounges, or mechanical and stair penthouse facilities.
(d) (1) Parking shall not be required for the portion of a project consisting of a building subject to adaptive reuse that does not have existing onsite parking.
(2) This article shall not reduce, eliminate, or preclude the enforcement of any requirement imposed on a new multifamily residential or nonresidential development to provide bicycle parking, if feasible.
(3) This
article shall not reduce, eliminate, or preclude the enforcement of any requirement imposed on a project that includes existing onsite parking to provide electric vehicle supply equipment installed parking spaces or parking spaces that are accessible to persons with disabilities that would have otherwise applied to the development if this section did not apply.
(e) An adaptive reuse project shall not violate the terms of any conservation easement applicable to the site.
(f) (1) A housing development proposed pursuant to this article shall be eligible for a density bonus, incentives or concessions, waivers or reductions of development standards, and parking ratios pursuant to Section 65915.
(2) For the purpose of calculating a density bonus for a project proposed pursuant to this article, the
base density of an adaptive reuse project shall be the density proposed by the developer, including the portion of a project consisting of a building with a proposed change in use and any adjacent portion of the project, notwithstanding any general plan density limit as described in paragraph (6) of subdivision (o) of Section 65915.
(3) The affordability criteria described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) shall apply to the base density of the project, and shall not apply to any bonus units proposed pursuant to Section 65915.
(g) A housing development proposed to adaptively reuse a building shall not be eligible for a density bonus waiver or incentive that has the effect of increasing the height of the adaptively reused building above what is allowed under subdivision (c).
65658.6.
(a) An adaptive reuse project that satisfies the requirements of Section 65658.5 may include the development of new residential or mixed-use structures on undeveloped areas and parking areas located on the same parcel as the proposed repurposed building, or on the parcels adjacent to the proposed adaptive reuse project site if all of the following requirements are met:(1) The adjacent portion of the project complies with the requirements of any of the following:
(A) The requirements of
paragraphs (5) and (8)
of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(B) The requirements of the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022 (Chapter 4.1 (commencing with Section 65912.100)), including the labor standards for construction workers in the act.
(C) The requirements of the Middle Class Housing Act of 2022 (Section 65852.24), including the labor standards for construction workers in the act.
(2) The adjacent
portion of the project is located on a parcel that satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(3) The adjacent portion of the project is located on a parcel that satisfies the requirements specified in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4, exclusive of clause (iv) of subparagraph (A), and subparagraph (K), of that paragraph.
(4) The adjacent portion of the project is located on a parcel that satisfies the requirements specified in paragraph (7) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(5) The applicant and local agency comply with the
requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 65913.4.
(6) Any existing open space on the proposed project site is not a historic resource.
(b) The adjacent portion of the project shall be eligible for a density bonus, incentives or concessions, waivers or reductions of development standards, and parking ratios pursuant to Section 65915.
(c) For purposes of this section, “adjacent portion of the project” means the portion of the project located on a site adjacent to the proposed repurposed existing building.
65658.7.
(a) (1) Before submitting an application for an adaptive reuse project pursuant to Section 65658.5 for a structure that is more than 50 years old and not listed on a local, state, or federal register of historic resources, the development proponent shall submit to the local government a notice of its intent to submit an application. The notice of intent shall be in the form of a preliminary application that includes all of the information described in Section 65941.1.(2) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to submit an application described in subdivision (a), the local government shall evaluate the project site for historical resources. The local government shall make a historic resource significance determination
within 90 days of submission of the notice of intent for purposes of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65658.5.
(3) Submission of a notice of intent pursuant to this section does not constitute owner consent for determination of eligibility for the California or national registers of historic places. Any determination of historic resource significance made pursuant to this subdivision shall apply only for the purposes of this article and shall not affect or be applicable to any other law.
(b) If the adaptive reuse project is proposed for an existing building that is listed on a local, state, or federal register of historic resources or if the local government has determined that the project site is a significant historic resource pursuant to subdivision (a), the adaptive reuse project proponent shall sign an affidavit declaring that the project will only move forward if
it complies with either of the following:
(1) The United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, as found in Part 67 of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, for the preservation of exterior facades of a building that face a street, interior facades of a building that face a courtyard, and interior spaces of a building that are publicly accessible and character defining, including ground floor lobbies. Exterior facades that do not face a street, interior facades that do not face a courtyard, and interior spaces that are not publicly accessible and character defining may be modified without regard to the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.
(2) The project is awarded federal historic rehabilitation tax credits pursuant to Section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code, or state historic rehabilitation tax credits pursuant
to Section 17053.91 or 23691 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(c) (1) (A) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), if the adaptive reuse project is proposed for a site that is listed on a local, state, or federal historic register and the adaptive reuse project proponent does not sign an affidavit pursuant to subdivision (b), the local government shall process the adaptive reuse project pursuant to Section 65658.8, but the local government may deny or conditionally approve the project if the local government makes a finding, based upon a preponderance of evidence in the record, that the project will cause a significant adverse impact to historic resources.
(B) A local agency may impose conditions of approval to mitigate impacts to historic resources and to comply with the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation,
as found in Part 67 of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, for the preservation of exterior facades of a building that face a street and interior spaces of a building that are publicly accessible and character defining, including ground floor lobbies, but shall not impose other conditions of approval. Exterior facades that do not face a street and interior spaces that are not publicly accessible and character defining shall not be required to be preserved according to the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.
(2) An adaptive reuse project pursuant to this section shall not constitute a “project” for purposes of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(d) For the purposes of this article, a local government’s evaluation of a site for historical resources and review of an adaptive reuse project for
consistency with the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation shall be conducted by a person who meets the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards, as published in Part 67 (commencing with Section 67.1) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Any revised professional qualifications standards adopted by the Secretary of the Interior that supersede the standards described in this paragraph shall apply.
65658.8.
(a) (1) Notwithstanding any local law, if a local government’s planning director or equivalent position determines that an adaptive reuse project submitted pursuant to this article is consistent with the objective planning standards specified in Section 65658.5 and Section 65658.6, if applicable, the local government shall approve the adaptive reuse project within the following timeframes:(A) Within 60 days of the date that the project
has been deemed consistent pursuant to this paragraph and paragraph (2), if the project contains 150 or fewer housing units.
(B) Within 90 days of the date that the project has been deemed consistent pursuant to this paragraph and paragraph (2), if the project contains more than 150 housing units.
(2) Upon a determination that an adaptive reuse project submitted pursuant to this section is in conflict with any of the objective planning standards specified in Section 65658.5 or Section 65658.6, if applicable, the local government staff or relevant local planning and permitting department that made the determination shall provide the development proponent written documentation
of which standard or standards the development conflicts with, and an explanation for the reason or reasons the development conflicts with that standard or standards within the following timeframes:
(A) Within 60 days of submittal of the adaptive reuse project to the local government pursuant to this section if the project contains 150 or fewer housing units.
(B) Within 90 days of submittal of the adaptive reuse project to the local government pursuant to this section if the project contains more than 150 housing units.
(C) Within 30 days of submittal of any adaptive reuse project that was resubmitted to the local government following a determination of a conflict with one or more objective planning standards pursuant to this paragraph.
(3) If the local government’s planning director or equivalent position fails to provide the required documentation pursuant to paragraph
(2), the adaptive reuse project shall be deemed to satisfy the objective planning standards specified in Section 65658.5 and Section 65658.6, if applicable.
(4) For purposes of this section, an adaptive reuse project is consistent with the objective planning standards specified in Section 65658.5 and Section 65658.6, if applicable, if there is substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the project is consistent with the objective planning standards. The local government shall not determine that an adaptive reuse project, including an application for a modification under subdivision
(f), is in conflict with the objective planning standards on the basis that application materials are not included, if the application contains substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the project is consistent with the objective planning standards.
(5) Upon submittal of an application for streamlined, ministerial approval pursuant to this section to the local government, all departments of the local government that are required to issue an approval of the adaptive reuse project before the granting of an entitlement shall comply with the requirements of this section within the time periods specified in
paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b) (1) (A) Any design review of the project may be conducted by the local government’s planning commission or any equivalent board or commission responsible for design review. That design review shall be objective and be strictly focused on assessing compliance with the criteria required for streamlined projects. That design review shall not in any way inhibit, chill, or preclude the ministerial approval
provided by this article.
(B) Any design review for the adjacent portion of the project shall be objective and be strictly focused on assessing compliance with the objective criteria required for streamlined projects, including, as applicable, those for new exterior additions to historic buildings described in Preservation Brief 14: New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns released by
the National Park Service within the United States Department of the Interior.
(2) If the adaptive reuse project is consistent with the requirements of Section 65658.5 and Section 65658.6, if applicable, and is consistent with all objective subdivision standards in the local subdivision ordinance, an application for a subdivision pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410)) shall be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) and shall be subject to the public oversight timelines set forth in paragraph (1).
(c) (1) Notwithstanding any law, a local government, whether or not it has adopted an ordinance governing automobile parking requirements in multifamily developments, shall not impose automobile parking standards for an adjacent portion of the project that was approved pursuant to this article in any of the following instances:
(A) The adjacent portion of the project is located within one-half mile of public transit.
(B) The adjacent portion of the project is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
(C) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupants of the adjacent portion of the project.
(D) When
there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the adjacent portion of the project.
(2) If the adjacent portion of the project does not fall within any of the categories described in paragraph (1), the local government shall not impose automobile parking requirements for the adjacent portion of the project approved pursuant to this article that exceed one parking space per unit.
(d) Notwithstanding any other law, a local government shall not require any of the following prior to approving an adaptive reuse project that meets the requirements of this article:
(1) Studies, information, or other materials that do not pertain directly to determining whether the adaptive reuse project is consistent with the objective planning standards applicable to the development.
(2) (A) Compliance with any standards necessary to receive a postentitlement permit.
(B) This paragraph does not prohibit a local agency from requiring compliance with any standards necessary to receive a postentitlement permit after a permit has been issued pursuant to this section.
(C) For purposes of this paragraph, “postentitlement permit” has the same meaning as provided in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (j) of Section 65913.3.
(e) (1) If a local government approves an adaptive reuse project pursuant to this article, then, notwithstanding any other law, that approval shall not expire if the project satisfies both of the following requirements:
(A) The project includes public investment in housing affordability, beyond tax credits.
(B) At least 20 percent of the units are affordable to households making at or below 80 percent of the area median income.
(2) (A) If a local government approves an adaptive reuse project pursuant to this article, and the project does not satisfy the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1), that approval shall remain valid for three years from the date of the final action establishing that approval, or if litigation is filed challenging that approval, from the date of the final judgment upholding that approval. Approval shall remain valid for a project provided construction activity, including demolition and grading activity, on the development site has begun pursuant to a permit issued by the
local jurisdiction and is in progress. For purposes of this subdivision, “in progress” means one of the following:
(i) Construction has begun and has not ceased for more than 365 days.
(ii) If the project requires multiple building permits, an initial phase has been completed, and the project proponent has applied for and is diligently pursuing a building permit for a subsequent phase, provided that once it has been issued, the building permit for the subsequent phase does not lapse.
(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), a local government may grant a project a one-time, one-year extension if the project proponent can provide documentation that there has been significant progress toward getting the adaptive reuse project construction ready, such as filing a building permit application.
(3) If the qualified adaptive reuse project proponent requests a modification pursuant to subdivision (f), then the time during which the approval shall remain valid shall be extended for the number of days between the submittal of a modification request and the date of its final approval, plus an additional 180 days to allow time to obtain a building permit. If litigation is filed relating to the modification request, the time shall be further extended during the pendency of the litigation. The extension required by this paragraph shall only apply to the first request for a modification submitted by the development proponent.
(f) (1) (A) A development proponent may request a modification to a qualified adaptive reuse project that has been approved under the streamlined approval process provided in this article if that request is submitted
to the local government before the issuance of the final building permit required for construction of the adaptive reuse project.
(B) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the local government shall approve a modification if it determines that the modification is consistent with the objective planning standards specified in subdivision (a) that were in effect when the original adaptive reuse project application was first submitted.
(C) The local government shall evaluate any modifications requested pursuant to this subdivision for consistency with the objective planning standards using the same assumptions and analytical methodology that the local government originally used to assess consistency for the adaptive reuse project that was approved for streamlined, ministerial approval pursuant to subdivision (a).
(2) Upon
receipt of the adaptive reuse project proponent’s application requesting a modification, the local government shall determine if the requested modification is consistent with the objective planning standard and either approve or deny the modification request within 60 days after submission of the modification, or within 90 days if design review is required.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the local government may apply objective planning standards to an adjacent portion of the project adopted after the project application was first submitted to the requested modification in any of the following instances:
(A) The adjacent portion of the project is revised such that the total number of residential units or total square footage of construction changes by 15 percent or more. The calculation of the square footage of construction changes shall not include underground space.
(B) The adjacent portion of the project is revised such that the total number of residential units or total square footage of construction changes by 5 percent or more and it is necessary to subject the project to an objective standard beyond those in effect when the project application was submitted in order to mitigate or avoid a specific, adverse impact, as that term is defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (j) of Section 65589.5, upon the public health or safety and there is no feasible alternative method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact. The calculation of the square footage of construction changes shall not include underground space.
(C) Objective building standards contained in the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations) or the California Historical Building Code (Part 8 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including, but not limited to, building plumbing, electrical, fire, and grading codes, may be applied to all modification applications that are submitted prior to the first building permit application. Those standards may be applied to modification applications submitted after the first building permit application if agreed to by the development proponent.
(4) The local government’s review of a modification request pursuant to this subdivision shall be strictly limited to determining whether the modification, including any modification to previously approved density bonus concessions or waivers, renders
the project inconsistent with the applicable objective planning standards and shall not reconsider prior determinations that are not affected by the modification.
65658.9.
(a) A local government shall issue a subsequent permit required for an adaptive reuse project approved under this article if the application substantially complies with the project as it was approved pursuant to Section 65658.8. Upon receipt of an application for a subsequent permit, the local government shall process the permit without unreasonable delay and shall not impose any procedure or requirement that is not imposed on projects that are not approved pursuant to this article. The local government shall consider the application for subsequent permits based upon the applicable objective standards specified in any state or local laws that were in effect when the original adaptive reuse project application was submitted, unless the proponent agrees to a change in objective standards. Issuance of subsequent permits shall implement the approved project, and review of the permit application shall not inhibit, chill, or preclude the adaptive reuse project. For purposes of this paragraph, a “subsequent permit” means a permit required subsequent to receiving approval under subdivision (a) of Section 65658.8, and includes, but is not limited to, demolition, grading, encroachment, and building permits and final maps.(b) (1) If a public improvement is necessary to implement a project subject to this article, including, but not limited to, a bicycle lane, sidewalk or walkway, public transit stop, driveway, street paving or overlay, a curb or gutter, a modified intersection, a street sign or street light, landscape or hardscape, an aboveground or underground utility connection, a water line, fire hydrant, storm or sanitary sewer connection, retaining wall, and any related work, and that public improvement is located on land
owned by the local government, to the extent that the public improvement requires approval from the local government, the local government shall not exercise its discretion over any approval relating to the public improvement in a manner that would inhibit, chill, or preclude the project.
(2) If an application for a public improvement described in paragraph (1) is submitted to a local government, the local government shall do all of the following:
(A) Consider the application based upon any objective standards specified in any state or local laws that were in effect when the original adaptive reuse project application was submitted.
(B) Conduct its review and approval in the same manner as it would evaluate the public improvement if required by a project that is not eligible to receive ministerial or streamlined
approval pursuant to this section.
(3) If an application for a public improvement described in paragraph (1) is submitted to a local government, the local government shall not do either of the following:
(A) Adopt or impose any requirement that applies to a project solely or partially on the basis that the project is eligible to receive ministerial or streamlined approval pursuant to this article.
(B) Unreasonably delay in its consideration, review, or approval of the application.
(c) Nothing in this article shall be interpreted to limit the applicability of Section 65913.3.
65658.10.
(a) A local government shall not adopt or impose any requirement, including, but not limited to, increased fees or inclusionary housing requirements, that applies to a project solely or partially on the basis that the project is eligible to receive ministerial or streamlined approval pursuant to this article.(b) This article shall not affect a project proponent’s ability to use any alternative streamlined by right permit processing adopted by a local government.
(c) Any project that qualifies as an adaptive reuse project pursuant to this article shall also qualify as a housing development project entitled to the protections of Section 65589.5.
(d) Alterations to an existing building necessary to comply with local code, the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), or the California Historical Building Code (Part 8 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) shall not disqualify a qualified adaptive reuse project from the streamlined, ministerial review process established under this article.
65658.11.
An adaptive reuse project approved by a local government pursuant to this part shall meet all of the following labor standards:(a) The development proponent shall require in contracts with construction contractors, and shall certify to the local government, that the standards specified in this section will be met in project construction.
(b) A development that is not in its entirety a public work for purposes of Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code and approved by a local government pursuant to Sections 65658.8 and 65658.9 shall be subject to all of the following:
(1) All construction
workers employed in the execution of the development shall be paid at least the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for the type of work and geographic area, as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to Sections 1773 and 1773.9 of the Labor Code, except that apprentices registered in programs approved by the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards may be paid at least the applicable apprentice prevailing rate.
(2) The development proponent shall ensure that the prevailing wage requirement is included in all contracts for the performance of the work for those portions of the development that are not a public work.
(3) All contractors and subcontractors for those portions of the development that are not a public work shall comply with both of the following:
(A) Pay to all
construction workers employed in the execution of the work at least the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, except that apprentices registered in programs approved by the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards may be paid at least the applicable apprentice prevailing rate.
(B) Maintain and verify payroll records pursuant to Section 1776 of the Labor Code and make those records available for inspection and copying as provided in that section. This subparagraph does not apply if all contractors and subcontractors performing work on the development are subject to a project labor agreement that requires the payment of prevailing wages to all construction workers employed in the execution of the development and provides for enforcement of that obligation through an arbitration procedure.
(c) (1) The obligation of the contractors and
subcontractors to pay prevailing wages pursuant to this section may be enforced by any of the following:
(A) The Labor Commissioner through the issuance of a civil wage and penalty assessment pursuant to Section 1741 of the Labor Code, which may be reviewed pursuant to Section 1742 of the Labor Code, within 18 months after the completion of the project.
(B) An underpaid worker through an administrative complaint or civil action.
(C) A joint labor-management committee through a civil action under Section 1771.2 of the Labor Code.
(2) If a civil wage and penalty assessment is issued pursuant to this section, the contractor, subcontractor, and surety on a bond or bonds issued to secure the payment of wages covered by the assessment shall be liable for
liquidated damages pursuant to Section 1742.1 of the Labor Code.
(3) This subdivision does not apply if all contractors and subcontractors performing work on the development are subject to a project labor agreement that requires the payment of prevailing wages to all construction workers employed in the execution of the development and provides for enforcement of that obligation through an arbitration procedure.
(d) Notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 1773.1 of the Labor Code, the requirement that employer payments not reduce the obligation to pay the hourly straight time or overtime wages found to be prevailing does not apply to those portions of development that are not a public work if otherwise provided in a bona fide collective bargaining agreement covering the worker.
(e) The requirement of this section
to pay at least the general prevailing rate of per diem wages does not preclude use of an alternative workweek schedule adopted pursuant to Section 511 or 514 of the Labor Code on developments and portions of developments that are not a public work.
65658.12.
In addition to the requirements of Section 65658.11, a development approved by a local government pursuant to this part that includes 40 or more housing units and does not include a building of more than four stories in height shall be subject to all of the following:(a) The development proponent shall require in contracts with construction contractors and shall certify to the local government that each contractor of any tier who will employ construction craft employees or will let subcontracts for at least 1,000 hours shall satisfy the
requirements in subdivisions (b) and (c). A construction contractor is deemed in compliance with subdivisions (b) and (c) if it is signatory to a valid collective bargaining agreement or project labor agreement that requires utilization of registered apprentices and expenditures on health care for employees and dependents.
(b) A contractor with construction craft employees shall either participate in an apprenticeship program approved by the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards pursuant to Section 3075 of the Labor Code, or request the dispatch of apprentices from a state-approved apprenticeship program under the terms and conditions set forth in Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code. A contractor without construction craft employees shall show a contractual obligation that its subcontractors comply with this subdivision.
(c) Each contractor with construction craft employees shall make health care expenditures for each employee in an amount per hour worked on the development equivalent to at least the hourly pro rata cost of a Covered California Platinum level plan for two 40-year-old adults and two dependents 0 to 14 years of age for the Covered California rating area in which the development is located. A contractor without construction craft employees shall show a contractual obligation that its subcontractors comply with this subdivision. Qualifying expenditures shall be credited toward compliance with prevailing wage payment requirements set forth in Section 65912.130.
(d) (1) The development proponent shall provide to the local government, on a monthly basis while its construction contracts on the development are being performed, a report demonstrating compliance with
subdivisions (b) and (c). The reports shall be considered public records under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1), and shall be open to public inspection.
(2) A development proponent that fails to provide the monthly report shall be subject to a civil penalty for each month for which the report has not been provided, in the amount of 10 percent of the dollar value of construction work performed by that contractor on the development in the month in question, up to a maximum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). Any contractor or subcontractor that fails to comply with subdivision (b) or (c) shall be subject to a civil penalty of two hundred dollars ($200) per day for each worker employed in contravention of subdivision (b) or (c).
(3) Penalties may be assessed by the Labor Commissioner within 18 months of completion of the
development using the procedures for issuance of civil wage and penalty assessments specified in Section 1741 of the Labor Code, and may be reviewed pursuant to Section 1742 of the Labor Code. Penalties shall be deposited in the State Public Works Enforcement Fund established pursuant to Section 1771.3 of the Labor Code.
(e) Each construction contractor shall maintain and verify payroll records pursuant to Section 1776 of the Labor Code. Each construction contractor shall submit payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner at least monthly in a format prescribed by the Labor Commissioner in accordance with subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 1771.4 of the Labor Code. The records shall include a statement of fringe benefits. Upon request by a joint labor-management cooperation committee established pursuant to the Federal Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (29 U.S.C. Sec. 175a), the records shall be
provided pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 1776 of the Labor Code.
(f) All construction contractors shall report any change in apprenticeship program participation or health care expenditures to the local government within 10 business days, and shall reflect those changes on the monthly report. The reports shall be considered public records pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1) and shall be open to public inspection.
(g) A joint labor-management cooperation committee established pursuant to the Federal Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (29 U.S.C. Sec. 175a) shall have standing to sue a construction contractor for failure to make health care expenditures pursuant to subdivision (c) in accordance with Section 218.7 or 218.8 of the Labor Code.
65658.13.
For any development project for an adaptive reuse project that includes 40 or more housing units and that includes a building of more than four stories in height, in addition to the requirements specified in Section 65658.11, all of the following skilled and trained workforce provisions apply:(a) Except as specified in subdivision (b), the project applicant shall enter into construction contracts with prime contractors only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) The contract contains an enforceable commitment that the prime contractor and subcontractors at every tier will use a skilled and trained workforce, as defined in Section 2601 of the Public Contract Code, to perform work on
the development project that falls within an apprenticeable occupation in the building and construction trades. However, this enforceable commitment requirement shall not apply to any scopes of work where new bids are accepted pursuant to subdivision (b).
(2) The project applicant or prime contractor shall establish minimum bidding requirements for subcontractors that are objective to the maximum extent possible. The project applicant or prime contractor shall not impose any obstacles in the bid process for subcontractors that go beyond what is reasonable and commercially customary. The project applicant or prime contractor shall accept bids submitted by any bidder that meets the minimum criteria set forth in the bid solicitation.
(3) The prime contractor has provided an affidavit under penalty of perjury that, in
compliance with this section, it will use a skilled and trained workforce and will obtain from its subcontractors an enforceable commitment to use a skilled and trained workforce for each scope of work in which it receives at least three bids attesting to satisfaction of the skilled and trained workforce requirements.
(4) When a prime contractor or subcontractor is required to provide an enforceable commitment that a skilled and trained workforce will be used to complete a contract or development project, the commitment shall be made in an enforceable agreement with the developer that provides the following:
(A) The prime contractor and subcontractors at every tier will comply with this section.
(B) The prime contractor will provide the project
applicant, on a monthly basis while the project or contract is being performed, a report demonstrating compliance by the prime contractor.
(C) The prime contractor shall provide the project applicant, on a monthly basis while the development project or contract is being performed, the monthly reports demonstrating compliance submitted to the prime contractor by the affected subcontractors.
(b) If a prime contractor fails to receive at least three bids in a scope of construction work from subcontractors that attest to satisfying the skilled and trained workforce requirements as described in this section, the prime contractor may accept new bids for that scope of work. The prime contractor need not require that a skilled and trained workforce be used by the subcontractors for that scope of work.
(c) If the skilled and trained workforce requirements of this section apply, the prime contractor shall require subcontractors to provide, and subcontractors on the development project shall provide, both of the following to the prime contractor:
(1) An affidavit signed under penalty of perjury that a skilled and trained workforce shall be employed on the development project.
(2) Reports on a monthly basis, while the development project or contract is being performed, demonstrating compliance with this section.
(d) Upon issuing any invitation or bid solicitation for the development project, but no less than 14 business days before the bid is due, the project applicant or prime contractor
shall send a notice of the invitation or solicitation that describes the development project to the following entities within the jurisdiction of the proposed development project site:
(1) Any bona fide labor organization representing workers in the building and construction trades who may perform work necessary to complete the development project and the local building and construction trades council.
(2) Any organization representing contractors that may perform work necessary to complete the development project, including any contractors’ association or regional builders’ exchange.
(e) The project applicant or prime contractor shall, within three business days of a request by a joint
labor-management cooperation committee established pursuant to the federal Labor Management Cooperation 8 Act of 1978 (29 U.S.C. Sec. 175a), provide both of the following:
(1) The names and Contractors State License Board numbers of the prime contractor and any subcontractors that submitted a proposal or bid for the development project.
(2) The names and Contractors State License Board numbers of contractors and subcontractors that are under contract to perform construction work.
(f) (1) The project applicant shall provide to the locality, on a monthly basis while the development project or contract is being performed, a report demonstrating that the
self-performing prime contractor and all nonexempt subcontractors used a skilled and trained workforce. A monthly report provided to the locality pursuant to this subdivision shall be a public record under the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1) and shall be open to public inspection. A project applicant that fails to provide a complete monthly report shall be subject to a civil penalty of 10 percent of the dollar value of construction work performed by that contractor on the development project in the month in question, up to a maximum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per month for each month for which the report has not been provided.
(2) Any subcontractor or prime contractor self-performing work subject to the skilled and trained workforce requirements under this section that fails to use a skilled and trained workforce shall be subject to a civil penalty of two hundred dollars ($200)
per day for each worker employed in contravention of the skilled and trained workforce requirement. Penalties may be assessed by the Labor Commissioner within 18 months of completion of the development project using the same issuance of civil wage and penalty assessments pursuant to Section 1741 of the Labor Code and may be reviewed pursuant to the same procedures in Section 1742 of the Labor Code. The prime contractor shall not be jointly liable for violations of this paragraph by subcontractors. Penalties shall be paid to the State Public Works Enforcement Fund, the locality, or the labor standards enforcement agency of the locality, depending on the lead entity performing the enforcement work.
(3) Any provision of a contract or agreement of any kind between a project applicant and a prime contractor that purports to delegate, transfer, or assign to a prime contractor any obligations of or penalties incurred by a project applicant shall be
deemed contrary to public policy and shall be void and unenforceable.
(g) The requirements of this section shall not apply if all contractors, subcontractors, and craft unions performing work on the development project are subject to a multicraft project labor agreement that requires the use of a skilled and trained workforce. The multicraft project labor agreement shall include all construction crafts with applicable coverage determinations for the specified scopes of work on the development project pursuant to Section 1773 of the Labor Code and shall be executed by all applicable labor organizations regardless of affiliation.
(h) The locality shall have standing to take administrative action against or sue a construction contractor for failure to comply with this section. A prevailing lead agency shall distribute
any wages and penalties to workers in accordance with law and retain any fees, additional penalties, or assessments.
65658.14.
The locality, and any labor standards enforcement agency that the locality lawfully maintains, may issue a stop notice to halt further work on the development project if work is proceeding in violation of any of the labor standards described in this article.(a) The locality or its labor standards enforcement agency shall lift the stop notice if the general contractor shows that the labor standards of this article will be followed going forward.
(b) The locality or its labor standards enforcement agency may revoke a building permit if the general contractor does not show that the labor standards of this article will be followed.
65658.15.
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, an adaptive reuse project shall be exempt from all impact fees that are not reasonably related to the impacts resulting from the change of use of the site from nonresidential to residential or mixed use. Any fees charged shall be roughly proportional to the difference in impacts caused by the change of use.(b) This section shall not apply to any adjacent portion of the project.
