Bill Text: CA AB998 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Amended
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Biomass energy facilities: State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: report.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2023-09-01 - In committee: Held under submission. [AB998 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB998-Amended.html
Section 25544 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
Bill Title: Biomass energy facilities: State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: report.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2023-09-01 - In committee: Held under submission. [AB998 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB998-Amended.html
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 15, 2023 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 998
Introduced by Assembly Member Connolly |
February 15, 2023 |
An act to add Section 25544 to the Public Resources Code, relating to energy.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 998, as amended, Connolly.
Biomass energy facilities: State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: report.
Existing law vests the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission with the exclusive power to certify sites and related facilities for thermal powerplants. Existing law requires an electrical corporation, local publicly owned electric utility, or community choice aggregator with a contract to procure electricity generated from biomass that expires or expired on or before December 31, 2028, to seek to amend the contract to include, or seek approval for a new contract that includes, an expiration date 5 years later than the expiration date in the contract that was operative in 2022, except as specified.
This bill would require the commission, on or before December 31, 2024, to issue a report on the utility-scale biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024. The bill would require the report to
include an assessment various assessments of operational factors of each facility, a comparison of direct combustion compared to other biomass energy technologies, and a recommended strategy, if appropriate, to repower biomass combustion facilities to noncombustion conversion technologies. biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, and options to maximize the environmental benefits of these facilities.
The bill would also require the report to include recommendations and strategies related to areas where combustion biomass facilities may be shut down or repowered, including strategies related to baseload power generation, processing waste, and job training, as provided. The a recommended strategy to upgrade biomass combustion facilities, where appropriate, that considers impacts on disadvantaged, rural forested, and agricultural communities, impacts on the ability to maintain existing capacity for managing forest or other excess biomass, the cost of upgrading facilities and financing opportunities, and job creation or job loss that may result from the strategy. The bill would require the report to include recommendations related to baseload power generation and managing excess biomass if biomass combustion facilities cease operation
and strategies related to processing waste and job training in areas where biomass combustion facilities cease operation. The bill would require the commission to include in the report an evaluation of the feasibility of upgrading utility-scale biomass combustion facilities that ceased operation before January 1, 2024, to determine whether such facilities could help California increase its capacity to manage forest and other excess biomass.
The bill would require the commission, in preparing the report, to coordinate with the State Air Resources Board and local air districts on emissions
assessments and emissions control options.
of environmental benefits and available technologies to maximize those benefits. By imposing new duties on local air districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require the commission, in preparing the report, to coordinate with specified state entities for feedstock assessments for forest, agricultural, urban, and postfire waste, engage with and solicit feedback from the communities in which biomass combustion facilities are located and the applicable local governments, and to provide opportunities for stakeholder and public input.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions
establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YESBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Communities throughout California, particularly in regions such as the North Bay area, are experiencing an escalation in catastrophic wildfire events that have become more frequent and severe due to the impacts of climate change.
(b) Research by the United States Forest Service shows that an estimated 129 million trees have died in California’s forests due to conditions caused by climate change, prolonged drought, bark beetle infestation, and high tree densities, which have created an unprecedented buildup of dry, combustible woody forest waste material.
(c) The Sierra Nevada Conservancy’s report “State of the Sierra Nevada’s Forests” demonstrates the direct environmental, social, and economic impacts of widespread tree mortality, such as increased fire danger linked to the accumulation of dead and dry fuel after a widespread mortality event.
(d) According to research by the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, the explosive growth of the 2020 Creek Fire was driven by mass fire behavior made possible by the high amount of dead forest waste alongside overly dense live trees within the fire’s interior.
(e) California relies on forest biomass facilities and their capacity to process residual forest waste from vegetation management operations on a large scale. While these facilities play an important role in mitigating wildfire risk, many facilities are decades old. With the state facing an annual forest waste inventory of approximately 54 million tons, the remaining biomass facilities should be examined to identify opportunities for upgrading, maximizing environmental benefit, technological improvements, and forest and other excess biomass processing capabilities.
SECTION 1.SEC. 2.
Section 25544 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:25544.
(a) The commission shall, on or before December 31, 2024, issue a report on the utility-scale biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, that includes all of the following:(1) An assessment of the capacity, feedstock, emissions, options to reduce emissions, feasibility of repowering, grid services, and other operational factors of each facility. capacity of biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, to process forest biomass and material resulting from vegetation management
and forest treatment projects.
(2) An assessment of the impacts, costs, and benefits of direct combustion compared to other biomass energy technologies. role each of the biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, play in achieving the state’s forest health improvement and wildfire risk reduction objectives.
(3) Options to maximize the environmental benefit of biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, and an analysis of the feasibility of upgrading these facilities with new technologies or alterations in
operations.
(3)
(4) A recommended strategy, if appropriate, strategy to repower some or all upgrade biomass combustion facilities to noncombustion conversion
technologies facilities, where appropriate, that considers all of the following:
(A) Impacts on disadvantaged communities. communities located near the biomass combustion facilities.
(B) Impacts on rural forested or agricultural communities.
(C) Impacts on the ability to maintain existing state, regional, and local capacity for managing forest or other excess biomass.
(C)
(D) Cost of repowering compared to other firm renewable technologies.
upgrading biomass combustion facilities and financing opportunities that may exist for those efforts.
(D)
(E) Job creation or job loss that may result from the strategy.
(4)
(5) Recommendations for how baseload power and the capacity for managing excess biomass would be made up in places with
if biomass combustion facilities that are recommended to be repowered or shut down.
still in operation as of January 1, 2024, subsequently cease operation.
(5)
(6) Strategies for processing forest, agricultural, urban, or postfire waste in areas where combustion biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, may be shut down.
cease operation temporarily or permanently.
(6)
(7) Strategies for job training in any areas where job loss would occur due to a biomass combustion facility shutting down or being repowered.
(8) An assessment of the type and duration of contract that would be necessary to encourage biomass combustion facilities still in operation as of January 1, 2024, to upgrade.
(b) The commission shall include
in the report required by subdivision (a) an evaluation of the feasibility of upgrading utility-scale biomass combustion facilities that ceased operation before January 1, 2024, to determine whether such facilities could help California increase its capacity to manage forest and other excess biomass.
(b)
(c) In preparing the report described in subdivision (a), the commission shall do all of the following:
(1) Coordinate with the State Air Resources Board and local air districts on emissions
assessments and emissions control options. of environmental benefits and available technologies to maximize those benefits.
(2) Coordinate with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the Department of Food and Agriculture, and the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery on feedstock assessments for forest, agricultural, urban, and postfire waste.
(3) Engage with and solicit feedback from the communities in which biomass combustion facilities are located and the applicable local governments.
(3)
(4) Provide opportunities for stakeholder and public input.