Bill Text: CA SB1394 | 2013-2014 | Regular Session | Amended
Bill Title: Education finance: local control funding formula: implementing regulations.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2014-04-02 - Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission. [SB1394 Detail]
Download: California-2013-SB1394-Amended.html
BILL NUMBER: SB 1394 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 25, 2014 INTRODUCED BY Senator Wyland FEBRUARY 21, 2014 An act to amend Section 42238.07 of the Education Code, relating to education finance, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1394, as amended, Wyland. Education finance: local control funding formula: implementing regulations. (1) Existing law establishes a public school financing system that requires state funding for county superintendents of schools, school districts, and charter schools to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified. Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt regulations that govern the expenditure of funds apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of unduplicated pupils, as specified. This bill would require the state board, on or before January 31, 2015, to amend those regulations to require an expenditure made pursuant to the local control funding formula for the primary benefit of unduplicated pupils to be expended on programs or services that are evidence based and have been shown to be effective in increasing the academic performance of those pupilsand, to require the State Department of Education to suspend funding received pursuant to the local control funding formulato a county office of education, a school district, or a charter schoolif the department makes a specifiedfinding.finding, and to prohibit a school district, county office of education, or charter school from receiving funding if the school district, county office of education, or charter school does not submit a local control and accountability plan that includes evidence-based programs that have been proven to be effective. The bill would state a related intent of the Legislature. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 42238.07 of the Education Code is amended to read: 42238.07. (a) On or before January 31, 2014, the state board shall adopt regulations that govern the expenditure of funds apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of unduplicated pupils pursuant to Sections 2574, 2575, 42238.02, and 42238.03. The regulations shall include, but are not limited to, provisions that do all of the following: (1) Require a school district, county office of education, or charter school to increase or improve services for unduplicated pupils in proportion to the increase in funds apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of unduplicated pupils in the school district, county office of education, or charter school. (2) Authorize a school district, county office of education, or charter school to use funds apportioned on the basis of the number of unduplicated pupils for schoolwide purposes, or, for school districts, districtwide purposes, for county offices of education, countywide purposes, or for charter schools, charterwide purposes, in a manner that is no more restrictive than the restrictions provided for in Title I of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.). (b) The state board may adopt emergency regulations for purposes of this section. (c) On or before January 31, 2015, the state board shall amend the regulations adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) to include provisions that dobothall of the following: (1) Require an expenditure made pursuant to the local control funding formula for the primary benefit of pupils to whom one or more of the definitions in Section 42238.01 applies to be expended on programs or services that are evidence based and have been shown to be effective in increasing the academic performance of those pupils. (2) Require the department to suspend funding received pursuant to the local control funding formula if the department makes a findingof any of the following:that a local control and accountability plan, adopted pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 52060) of Chapter 6.1 of Part 28 of Division 4, is not significantly improving pupil reading and comprehension skills and English learner performance. (3) Prohibit a school district, county office of education, or charter school from receiving funding pursuant to the local control funding formula if the school district, county office of education, or charter school does not submit a local control and accountability plan, adopted pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 52060) of Chapter 6.1 of Part 28 of Division 4, that includes evidence-based programs that have been proven to be effective.(A) The program or service is not meeting the targeted goals outlined by the local control funding formula.(B) The local control and accountability plan, adopted pursuant to Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 52060) of Chapter 6.1 of Part 28 of Division 4, is not being adhered to by a county board of education, a governing board of a school district, or a governing body of a charter school.(C) The county office of education is not properly holding the governing board of a school district, the governing body of a charter school, and schools accountable for program performance.SEC. 2. It is the intent of the Legislature that any expenditures made pursuant to the local control funding formula in the Budget Act of 2013 for the primary benefit of pupils to whom one or more of the definitions in Section 42238.01 of the Education Code apply shall be expended on programs or services that are evidence based and have been shown to be effective in increasing the academic performance of those pupils. SEC. 3. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: In order to include sufficient accountability measures in the local control funding formula and the regulations adopted by the State Board of Education in January 2014 to implement the local control funding formula, it is necessary that this bill go into immediate effect.