Bill Text: CA SB931 | 2021-2022 | Regular Session | Enrolled

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Deterring union membership: violations.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)

Status: (Passed) 2022-09-29 - Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 823, Statutes of 2022. [SB931 Detail]

Download: California-2021-SB931-Enrolled.html

Enrolled  September 01, 2022
Passed  IN  Senate  August 30, 2022
Passed  IN  Assembly  August 24, 2022
Amended  IN  Assembly  August 15, 2022
Amended  IN  Senate  May 19, 2022
Amended  IN  Senate  April 21, 2022

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2021–2022 REGULAR SESSION

Senate Bill
No. 931


Introduced by Senator Leyva
(Principal coauthor: Senator Laird)

February 07, 2022


An act to add Section 3551.5 to the Government Code, relating to public employment.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


SB 931, Leyva. Deterring union membership: violations.
Existing law prohibits a public employer from deterring or discouraging public employees or applicants to be public employees from becoming or remaining members of an employee organization, authorizing representation by an employee organization, or authorizing dues or fee deductions to an employee organization. Existing law generally vests jurisdiction over violations of these provisions in the Public Employment Relations Board.
This bill would authorize an employee organization, as described, to bring a claim before the Public Employment Relations Board alleging that a public employer violated the above-described provisions. Upon a finding by the board that the public employer violated those provisions, the public employer would be subject to a civil penalty, to be deposited in the General Fund, of up to $1,000 for each affected employee, not to exceed $100,000 in total, and subject to attorney’s fees and costs, as described and except as specified. The bill would also require the board to apply specified criteria when assessing the civil penalty.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 3551.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:

3551.5.
 (a) (1) An employee organization that is subject to the jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board may bring a claim before the board alleging that a public employer violated Section 3550. Upon a finding by the board that the public employer violated Section 3550, the employer shall be subject to a civil penalty, to be deposited in the General Fund, of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per each affected employee, not to exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in total, and shall be subject to attorney’s fees and costs, as described in subdivision (b).
(2) The Public Employment Relations Board shall apply the following criteria when assessing a civil penalty pursuant to paragraph (1):
(A) The public employer’s annual budget.
(B) The severity of the violation.
(C) Any prior history of violations by the public employer.
(b) (1) The Public Employment Relations Board shall award attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing employee organization unless the board finds the claim was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the employee organization continued to litigate after it clearly became so. The attorney’s fees and costs shall be calculated from the inception of proceedings before the board’s Division of Administrative Law until final disposition of the claim by the board.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the board shall not award attorney’s fees and costs under this section for any proceedings before the board that challenge the dismissal of an unfair practice charge by the board’s Office of the General Counsel.
(3) If the board initiates proceedings with the superior court to enforce or achieve compliance with a board order pursuant to this section or is required to defend a decision of the board involving this section after an employer seeks judicial review, the court shall award the board attorney’s fees and costs if the board is the prevailing party.

feedback