Bill Text: FL H0569 | 2011 | Regular Session | Introduced

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Relief/Ronald Miller/City of Hollywood

Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill

Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-05-07 - Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration [H0569 Detail]

Download: Florida-2011-H0569-Introduced.html
HB 569

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act for the relief of Ronald Miller by the City of
3Hollywood; providing for an appropriation to compensate
4him for injuries sustained as a result of the negligence
5of the City of Hollywood; providing a limitation on the
6payment of fees and costs; providing an effective date.
7
8     WHEREAS, on July 30, 2002, Ronald Miller was driving his
9pickup truck home from work, northbound on Federal Highway in
10the left-turn lane, and
11     WHEREAS, at that time, a City of Hollywood employee, Robert
12Mettler, who was driving a city utilities truck, cut across the
13lanes of northbound traffic and crashed into Mr. Miller's
14vehicle head-on, and
15     WHEREAS, Mr. Mettler should have not been allowed to drive
16a city vehicle, given his extensive history of drunken driving
17and traffic violations, and
18     WHEREAS, the impact of the crash caused Mr. Miller to
19suffer two herniated disks in his neck and he has had multiple
20surgeries to correct torn ligaments in both knees, and
21     WHEREAS, after the knee surgeries, Mr. Miller had to be
22rehospitalized due to complications, including deep-venous
23thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and
24     WHEREAS, according to his orthopedic surgeon, Steven
25Wender, M.D., Mr. Miller will require knee replacements on both
26legs over the next 40 years of his life every 7 to 13 years, at
27a cost of approximately $100,000 per surgery, and is likely to
28require additional medical care for his neck, and
29     WHEREAS, Mr. Miller's past medical expenses total
30approximately $75,000, and
31     WHEREAS, the City Attorney informed the Hollywood City
32Commission that it was likely to face a substantial adverse
33verdict in the case but did not attempt to reach a reasonable
34settlement given the city's exposure to liability and damages,
35and
36     WHEREAS, the jury found in favor of Ronald Miller and a
37Final Judgment was entered in the amount of $1,130,731.89, which
38included approximately $75,000 for past medical bills and
39$415,000 for future medical expenses, $200,000 for past pain and
40suffering, and $500,000 for future pain and suffering, and
41     WHEREAS, a Cost Judgment was entered in favor of Mr. Miller
42for $17,257.82, and
43     WHEREAS, the City of Hollywood filed a frivolous posttrial
44motion, which was summarily denied by the trial judge, an
45appeal, for which the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed
46the judgment per curiam, and a motion for rehearing of the
47appeal, which was summarily denied by the appellate court, and
48     WHEREAS, the City of Hollywood has paid $100,000 to Ronald
49Miller under the statutory limits of liability set forth in s.
50768.28, Florida Statutes, leaving the sum of $1,047,989.71
51unpaid, NOW, THEREFORE,
52
53Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
54
55     Section 1.  The facts stated in the preamble to this act
56are found and declared to be true.
57     Section 2.  The City of Hollywood is authorized and
58directed to appropriate from funds of the city not otherwise
59appropriated and to draw a warrant, payable to Ronald Miller,
60for the total amount of $1,047,989.71 as compensation for
61injuries and damages sustained as a result of the negligence of
62the City of Hollywood.
63     Section 3.  The amount paid by the City of Hollywood
64pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the amount awarded
65under this act are intended to provide the sole compensation for
66all present and future claims arising out of the factual
67situation described in this act which resulted in injuries to
68Ronald Miller. The total amount paid for attorney's fees,
69lobbying fees, costs, and other similar expenses relating to
70this claim may not exceed 25 percent of the amount awarded under
71this act.
72     Section 4.  This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
feedback