Bill Text: FL S1384 | 2013 | Regular Session | Comm Sub
Bill Title: Nursing Home Litigation
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (? 2-1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2013-05-03 - Died on Calendar [S1384 Detail]
Download: Florida-2013-S1384-Comm_Sub.html
Florida Senate - 2013 CS for CS for SB 1384 By the Committees on Health Policy; and Judiciary; and Senator Galvano 588-04476-13 20131384c2 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to nursing home litigation; amending 3 s. 400.0237, F.S.; providing that a claim for punitive 4 damages may not be brought unless there is a showing 5 of admissible evidence proffered by the parties which 6 provides a reasonable basis for recovery of punitive 7 damages when certain criteria are applied; requiring 8 the court to conduct a hearing to determine whether 9 there is sufficient admissible evidence to ensure that 10 there is a reasonable basis to believe that the 11 claimant will be able to demonstrate by clear and 12 convincing evidence that the recovery of punitive 13 damages is appropriate; requiring the trier of fact to 14 find by clear and convincing evidence that a specific 15 person or corporate defendant actively and knowingly 16 participated in intentional misconduct or engaged in 17 conduct that constituted gross negligence and 18 contributed to the loss, damages, or injury suffered 19 by the claimant before punitive damages may be 20 awarded; requiring an officer, director, or manager of 21 the employer, corporation, or legal entity to condone, 22 ratify, or consent to certain specified conduct before 23 holding the licensee vicariously liable for punitive 24 damages; providing an effective date. 25 26 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 27 28 Section 1. Section 400.0237, Florida Statutes, is amended 29 to read: 30 400.0237 Punitive damages; pleading; burden of proof.— 31 (1)(a) In any actionfor damagesbrought under this part, a 32noclaim for punitive damages may not be broughtshall be33permittedunless there is areasonableshowing of admissibleby34 evidence that has been submittedin the record or profferedby 35 the parties and providesclaimant which would providea 36 reasonable basis for recovery of such damages when the criteria 37 in this section are applied. The claimant may move to amend her 38 or his complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages as 39 allowed by the rules of civil procedure in accordance with 40 evidentiary requirements set forth in this section. 41 (b) The court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing to 42 determine whether there is sufficient admissible evidence 43 submitted by all parties to ensure that there is a reasonable 44 basis to believe that the claimant, at trial, will be able to 45 demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the recovery 46 of such damages is warranted. AThe rules of civil procedure47shall be liberally construed so as to allow the claimant48discovery of evidence which appears reasonably calculated to49lead to admissible evidence on the issue of punitive damages. No50 discovery of financial worth may notshallproceed untilafter51 the pleading onconcerningpunitive damages is approved by the 52 courtpermitted. 53 (2) A defendant may be held liable for punitive damages 54 only if the trier of fact, bybased onclear and convincing 55 evidence, finds that a specific person or corporate defendant 56 actively and knowingly participated in intentional misconduct or 57 engaged in conduct that constitutes gross negligence and 58 contributed to the loss, damages, or injury suffered by the 59 claimantthe defendant was personally guilty of intentional60misconduct or gross negligence. As used in this section, the 61 term: 62 (a) “Intentional misconduct” means that the defendant 63 against whom punitive damages are sought had actual knowledge of 64 the wrongfulness of the conduct and the high probability that 65 injury or damage to the claimant would result and, despite that 66 knowledge, intentionally pursued that course of conduct, 67 resulting in injury or damage. 68 (b) “Gross negligence” means that the defendant’s conduct 69 was so reckless or wanting in care that it constituted a 70 conscious disregard or indifference to the life, safety, or 71 rights of persons exposed to such conduct. 72 (3) In the case of vicarious liability of an employer, 73 principal, corporation, or other legal entity, punitive damages 74 may not be imposed for the conduct of an employee or agent 75 unlessonly ifthe conduct of a specifically identifiedthe76 employee or agent meets the criteria specified in subsection (2) 77 and an officer, director, or manager of the actual employer, 78 corporation, or legal entity condoned, ratified, or consented to 79 the specific conduct as alleged in subsection (2). A state or 80 federal survey report of nursing facilities may not be used to 81 establish an entitlement to punitive damages under this section:82(a) The employer, principal, corporation, or other legal83entity actively and knowingly participated in such conduct;84(b) The officers, directors, or managers of the employer,85principal, corporation, or other legal entity condoned,86ratified, or consented to such conduct; or87(c) The employer, principal, corporation, or other legal88entity engaged in conduct that constituted gross negligence and89that contributed to the loss, damages, or injury suffered by the90claimant. 91 (4) The plaintiff shallmustestablish at trial, by clear 92 and convincing evidence, its entitlement to an award of punitive 93 damages. The “greater weight of the evidence” burden of proof 94 applies to a determination of the amount of damages. 95 (5) This section is remedial in nature and takesshall take96 effect upon becoming a law. 97 Section 2. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.