Bill Text: HI HB798 | 2012 | Regular Session | Amended

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft

---

Bill Title: Taxation; General Excise Tax; Exemptions; Repeal

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Enrolled - Dead) 2012-04-13 - (S) Received notice of disagreement (Hse. Com. No. 547). [HB798 Detail]

Download: Hawaii-2012-HB798-Amended.html

---

 

 

STAND. COM. REP. NO. 827

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    H.B. No. 798

       H.D. 1

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Shan S. Tsutsui

President of the Senate

Twenty-Sixth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2011

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection, to which was referred H.B. No. 798, H.D. 1, entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO TAXATION,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to impose the general excise tax on gross income derived from a life settlement contract by a person not related to the insured.

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from the Department of Taxation and Imua Alliance.  Your Committee received testimony in opposition to this measure from The Hawaii Business League.  Your Committee received comments on this measure from Tax Foundation of Hawaii.

 

     Your Committee finds that this measure taxes gross income received from a life settlement contract payout in the same manner as gross income received from an ordinary business transaction.  Your Committee notes that this measure applies not to the beneficiaries of a family member's life insurance policy, but rather to persons unrelated to the insured who are in the business of buying and selling life settlement contracts as a commercial enterprise.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Inserting an effective date of July 1, 2050, to allow for further discussion; and

 

     (2)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 798, H.D. 1, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 798, H.D. 1, S.D. 1, and be referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection,

 

____________________________ ROSALYN H. BAKER, Chair