Bill Text: HI HB874 | 2010 | Regular Session | Amended

---

Bill Title: Residential Real Property; Prohibition on Transfer Fees

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2009-05-11 - Carried over to 2010 Regular Session. [HB874 Detail]

Download: Hawaii-2010-HB874-Amended.html

---

 

 

STAND. COM. REP. NO. 994

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    H.B. No. 874

       H.D. 2

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Colleen Hanabusa

President of the Senate

Twenty-Fifth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2009

State of Hawaii

 

Madam:

 

     Your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection, to which was referred H.B. No. 874, H.D. 2, entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY,"

 

begs leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose of this measure is to prohibit a deed restriction or covenant that requires the payment of a transfer fee to a specified private party every time a property is sold or transferred. 

 

     Your Committee received testimony in support of this measure from Hawai‘i Association of Realtors.  Testimony in opposition to this measure was received from 1250 Oceansides Partners.  Written testimony presented to the Committee may be reviewed on the Legislature's website.

 

     Your Committee finds that some real estate developers charge transfer fees that require a payment to the developer every time a property is sold or transferred from one owner to the next.  Some of these fees are unrelated to any legitimate purpose and serve only to enrich the developer.  Your Committee finds that there is presently no regulation of these fees, no limitation on their application, and no accountability or oversight of the recipients. 

 

     Your Committee notes the concerns expressed by testifiers that the exemptions from the prohibition on transfer fees contained in this measure do not account for currently existing, judicially mandated or sanctioned transfer fees.  It is not the intent of your Committee to place any individual in the untenable position of being forced to choose between complying with a court order and a legislative mandate. However, as a public policy, it is troublesome to allow a developer to settle private disputes by burdening future purchasers who were not party to the original dispute.  Accordingly, your Committee has included an amendment that ameliorates this concern, but respectfully requests that the Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations further consider this issue, which lies properly in that Committee's jurisdiction.

 

     Your Committee has amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Clarifying that the prohibition on transfer fees is prospective, and does not affect deed restrictions or other covenants running with the land made prior to July 1, 2009; and

 

     (2)  Making technical, nonsubstantive changes for the purpose of clarity and accuracy in its language. 

 

     As affirmed by the record of votes of the members of your Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection that is attached to this report, your Committee is in accord with the intent and purpose of H.B. No. 874, H.D. 2, as amended herein, and recommends that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as H.B. No. 874, H.D. 2, S.D. 1, and be referred to the Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection,

 

		____________________________ ROSALYN H. BAKER, Chair