Bill Text: HI SB1460 | 2012 | Regular Session | Amended

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Marijuana; Civil Penalties for Possession of One Ounce or Less

Spectrum: Strong Partisan Bill (Democrat 19-1)

Status: (Engrossed - Dead) 2011-12-01 - Carried over to 2012 Regular Session. [SB1460 Detail]

Download: Hawaii-2012-SB1460-Amended.html

 

 

STAND. COM. REP. NO. 368

 

Honolulu, Hawaii

                  

 

RE:    S.B. No. 1460

       S.D. 1

 

 

 

Honorable Shan S. Tsutsui

President of the Senate

Twenty-Sixth State Legislature

Regular Session of 2011

State of Hawaii

 

Sir:

 

     Your Committees on Judiciary and Labor and Health, to which was referred S.B. No. 1460 entitled:

 

"A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO MARIJUANA,"

 

beg leave to report as follows:

 

     The purpose and intent of this measure is to establish a civil violation for possession of one ounce or less of marijuana that is subject to a fine of not more than $100.

 

     Your Committees received testimony in support of this measure from the The Libertarian Party; NORML Foundation; American Civil Liberties Union of Hawaii; the Drug Policy Forum of Hawaii; the Drug Policy Action Group; Peaceful Sky Alliance; Law Enforcement Against Prohibition; Natural Cancer Wellness Foundation; Friends 4 Justice; and twenty-five individuals.  Your Committees received testimony in opposition to this measure from the Attorney General; the Department of Public Safety; the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney of the City and County of Honolulu; the Hawaii County Office of the Prosecuting Attorney; the Police Department of the City and County of Honolulu; the County of Hawaii Police Department; Save Our Society From Drugs; Coalition for a Drug-Free Hawaii; and one individual.

 

     Your Committees find that there are significant concerns about whether the current treatment of simple marijuana possession of one ounce or less is effective.  According to a report by Lawrence W. Boyd, Ph.D, an economist from the University of Hawaii West Oahu, the costs of prosecuting simple marijuana possession far outweigh the benefits of doing so.  Presently, state and county law enforcement agencies spend over $4,000,000 per year to enforce marijuana possession laws.  An additional $2,100,000 is spent by the courts.  Your Committees believe that these prosecution and enforcement costs are not borne by the current fines for a defendant convicted for simple possession of marijuana, typically $50 to $100, if any.  On the other hand, a civil violation fine of $100 should reduce costs for prosecution and enforcement, while increasing the fines collected for this conduct.

 

     Your Committees received testimony from the Attorney General raising concerns of possession of marijuana near schools and the question of the method of adjudication of the violation.  Moreover, several testifiers expressed concern that this measure might give the incorrect impression to minors that possession of marijuana was acceptable, notwithstanding that such possession is still prohibited conduct under this measure.

 

     Accordingly, your Committees have amended this measure by:

 

     (1)  Establishing an adjudicatory process for enforcing the violation that is similar to the enforcement of traffic violations;

 

     (2)  Reiterating in the purpose section of the measure that making possession of one ounce or less of marijuana a civil violation does not imply that the Legislature believes that such conduct is acceptable and that under this measure, such possession is still prohibited conduct;

 

     (3)  Deleting section 10 regarding controlled substances near schools, school vehicles, or public parks, which would have provided that mere possession of one ounce or less of marijuana would not constitute intent to distribute marijuana without other conduct;

 

     (4)  Inserting an effective date of July 1, 2050, to allow for further discussion; and

 

     (5)  Making technical, nonsubstantive amendments for the purposes of clarity and consistency.

 

     As affirmed by the records of votes of the members of your Committees on Judiciary and Labor and Health that are attached to this report, your Committees are in accord with the intent and purpose of S.B. No. 1460, as amended herein, and recommend that it pass Second Reading in the form attached hereto as S.B. No. 1460, S.D. 1, and be referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

 

Respectfully submitted on behalf of the members of the Committees on Judiciary and Labor and Health,

 

____________________________

JOSH GREEN, M.D., Chair

 

____________________________

CLAYTON HEE, Chair

 

feedback