Bill Text: IL HB5105 | 2023-2024 | 103rd General Assembly | Introduced
Bill Title: Creates the COVID-19 Vaccination Employer Mandate Prohibition Act. Provides that it is unlawful for an employer in the State of Illinois to create, implement, or otherwise enforce a workplace vaccination program that requires any employee to demonstrate to the employer that he or she has received a vaccine or its related booster that was approved under emergency use authorization by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Effective immediately.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced) 2024-02-08 - Referred to Rules Committee [HB5105 Detail]
Download: Illinois-2023-HB5105-Introduced.html
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning employment.
| |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | COVID-19 Vaccination Employer Mandate Prohibition Act.
| |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Section 5. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Act to allow | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | individuals to have the bodily autonomy to make the decision | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | of whether or not to receive a vaccination or its related | |||||||||||||||||||
9 | booster that was approved by the United States Food and Drug | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Administration to be used under emergency use authorization | |||||||||||||||||||
11 | for treatment of COVID-19. The fact that the vaccines made | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | available amid the global pandemic have been granted emergency | |||||||||||||||||||
13 | use authorization means that both regulatory bodies and | |||||||||||||||||||
14 | industry experts have not been allotted sufficient time to | |||||||||||||||||||
15 | study either the short-term and long-term effects that may | |||||||||||||||||||
16 | arise from the administration of vaccinations authorized for | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | emergency use. Additionally, since COVID-19 is no longer | |||||||||||||||||||
18 | categorized as a pandemic, the need for vaccine mandates is no | |||||||||||||||||||
19 | longer present. Therefore, the State is compelled to prohibit | |||||||||||||||||||
20 | employers from requiring that employees receive a vaccine or | |||||||||||||||||||
21 | its related booster that has been approved under emergency use | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | authorization as a condition of employment.
|
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | Section 10. Prohibition. It is unlawful for an employer in | ||||||
2 | this State to create, implement, or otherwise enforce a | ||||||
3 | workplace vaccination program that requires an employee to | ||||||
4 | demonstrate to the employer that he or she has received a | ||||||
5 | vaccine or its related booster that was approved under | ||||||
6 | emergency use authorization by the United States Food and Drug | ||||||
7 | Administration, under the Administration's power outlined in | ||||||
8 | Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, for | ||||||
9 | protection against COVID-19.
|