Bill Text: MI HB5278 | 2015-2016 | 98th Legislature | Engrossed

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Drains; financing; incomplete drain improvement; specify types of costs that can be apportioned. Amends secs. 306 & 307 of 1956 PA 40 (MCL 280.306 & 280.307).

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Passed) 2016-05-11 - Assigned Pa 115'16 With Immediate Effect [HB5278 Detail]

Download: Michigan-2015-HB5278-Engrossed.html

HB-5278, As Passed House, March 8, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBSTITUTE FOR

 

HOUSE BILL NO. 5278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     A bill to amend 1956 PA 40, entitled

 

"The drain code of 1956,"

 

by amending sections 306 and 307 (MCL 280.306 and 280.307).

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 306. Whenever If revolving fund moneys have money has

 

been expended or a drainage district has become is obligated to pay

 

expenses for engineering, legal, and or administrative services or

 

to pay principal and interest on notes, by action of the drain

 

commissioner, or drainage board and no and if an improvement has

 

not been completed subsequent to after the drain commissioner's

 

order designating a county drainage district, or the entry of the

 

first order of determination as prescribed in under section 72,

 

where an intracounty drain is involved, or the filing of a

 

petition, if a petition has been filed, whichever is later, the

 


drain commissioner of such county which has expended such revolving

 

fund moneys may report such this fact to the county board of

 

supervisors. commissioners. If no an improvement has not been

 

completed within a period of 5 years subsequent to after the date

 

of the drain commissioner's order designating a drainage district,

 

or the entry of the first order of determination as prescribed in

 

under section 72, or the filing of a petition, if a petition has

 

been filed and ordered abandoned, whichever is later, the drain

 

commissioner of such county shall report such that fact to the

 

county board of supervisors. commissioners. If the sum involved is

 

too small to justify spreading the same sum over the designated

 

drainage district, above referred to, such board of supervisors the

 

county board of commissioners may order that the sum to be spread

 

against the property of the original petitioners according to such

 

percentage as the commissioners shall deem consider just and

 

equitable. , based on the same benefit theory as if the improvement

 

had been completed. If the sum involved is large enough to, in the

 

opinion of the board of supervisors, create undue hardship on the

 

original petitioners, Otherwise, the county board of supervisors

 

commissioners may order that the same sum be spread over such

 

designated the district and the drain commissioner shall apportion

 

the cost thereof sum to the parties that would have been benefited

 

in the district as provided in chapter 7 for the purpose of

 

permitting a review of the assessment roll as to fairness of the

 

apportionment only.

 

     Sec. 307. Whenever If revolving fund moneys have been expended

 

and no improvement has been completed subsequent to money has been


expended or a drainage district is obligated to pay expenses for

 

engineering, legal, or administrative services or to pay principal

 

and interest on notes and if an improvement has not been completed

 

within 5 years after the date of the drainage board's order

 

designating a an intercounty drainage district as prescribed in

 

under section 105, of this act where an intercounty drain is

 

involved, within a period of 5 years, the entry of the first order

 

of determination under section 122, or the filing of a petition, if

 

a petition has been filed and ordered abandoned, whichever is

 

later, the drainage board created in section 102 of this act shall

 

apportion the cost as between counties. Any If requested by a drain

 

commissioner feeling aggrieved by such the apportionment, may

 

request review by the board of review provided in section 106 of

 

this act, and such board shall proceed to review the same as

 

provided in this act. shall review the apportionment under section

 

106. The decisions of the board of review shall be are final.

 

Thereafter the amount apportioned to each county shall be recovered

 

by each the county as above outlined provided in section 306 for

 

the recovery of expended revolving fund moneys expended for an

 

intracounty drain in section 306 of this act.money or indebtedness

 

for which a drainage district is obligated.

feedback