Bill Text: NJ S191 | 2010-2011 | Regular Session | Introduced

NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Concerns priority of claims against certain insured tortfeasors as between insurer paying PIP benefits and injured party.

Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (Democrat 3-1)

Status: (Passed) 2011-01-28 - Approved P.L.2011, c.11. [S191 Detail]

Download: New_Jersey-2010-S191-Introduced.html

SENATE, No. 191

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

214th LEGISLATURE

 

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2010 SESSION

 


 

Sponsored by:

Senator  NICHOLAS P. SCUTARI

District 22 (Middlesex, Somerset and Union)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Concerns priority of claims against certain insured tortfeasors as between insurer paying PIP benefits and injured party.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel

  


An Act concerning recovery of personal injury protection benefits under certain circumstances and amending P.L.1983, c.362 (C.39:6A-9.1).

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.    Section 20 of P.L.1983, c.362 (C.39:6A-9.1) is amended to read as follows:

     20.  a. An insurer, health maintenance organization or governmental agency paying benefits pursuant to subsection a., b. or d. of section 13 of P.L.1983, c.362 (C.39:6A-4.3), personal injury protection benefits in accordance with section 4 or section 10 of P.L.1972, c.70 (C.39:6A-4 or 39:6A-10), medical expense benefits pursuant to section 4 of P.L.1998, c.21 (C.39:6A-3.1) or benefits pursuant to section 45 of P.L.2003, c.89 (C.39:6A-3.3), as a result of an accident occurring within this State, shall, within two years of the filing of the claim, have the right to recover the amount of payments from any tortfeasor who was not, at the time of the accident, required to maintain personal injury protection or medical expense benefits coverage, other than for pedestrians, under the laws of this State, including personal injury protection coverage required to be provided in accordance with section 18 of P.L.1985, c.520 (C.17:28-1.4), or although required did not maintain personal injury protection or medical expense benefits coverage at the time of the accident.

     b.    In the case of an accident occurring in this State involving an insured tortfeasor, the determination as to whether an insurer, health maintenance organization or governmental agency is legally entitled to recover the amount of payments and the amount of recovery, including the costs of processing benefit claims and enforcing rights granted under this section, shall be made against the insurer of the tortfeasor, and shall be by agreement of the involved parties or, upon failing to agree, by arbitration.  Any recovery by an insurer, health maintenance organization or governmental agency pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to any claim against the insured tortfeasor's insurer by the injured party and shall be paid only after satisfaction of that claim, up to the limits of the insured tortfeasor's motor vehicle or other liability insurance policy.

(cf:  P.L.2003, c.89, s.53)

 

     2.    This act shall take effect immediately.


STATEMENT

 

     This bill amends the statutory provision which permits an insurer, health maintenance organization or governmental agency which has paid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under a private passenger automobile insurance policy to recover the amount of those benefits paid from the tortfeasor, or the tortfeasor's insurer.  The amendment made by the bill provides that any recovery by the insurer, health maintenance organization or governmental agency from the tortfeasor's insurer shall be subject to any claim by the injured party and shall be paid only after satisfaction of that claim, up to the limits of the insured tortfeasor's motor vehicle or other liability insurance policy.

     This bill is in response to the decision in Fernandez v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 402 N.J.Super. 166 (App. Div. 2008), in which the Appellate Division held that under the statute at issue, the claim of an insurer which has paid PIP benefits has priority over the claim of that insurer's insured who seeks recovery from the tortfeasor's liability insurance for unpaid medical expenses, pain, suffering, or other damages caused by the accident. The amendment made by this bill would reverse that outcome.

feedback