| |
|
| |
| THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| |
| SENATE RESOLUTION |
|
| |
| |
| INTRODUCED BY MUSTO, JULY 6, 2009 |
| |
| |
| REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION, JULY 6, 2009 |
| |
| |
| |
| A RESOLUTION |
| |
1 | Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to |
2 | conduct a study of the feasibility of providing passenger |
3 | rail service between Wilkes-Barre and Scranton in conjunction |
4 | with the proposed restoration of passenger rail service |
5 | between Scranton and New York City. |
6 | WHEREAS, In a letter to the President of the United States |
7 | dated April 21, 2009, United States Senators Robert P. Casey, |
8 | Jr., and Arlen Specter, together with Senators Charles E. |
9 | Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, announced their support to |
10 | restore passenger rail service from Binghamton, New York, |
11 | through Scranton, to New York City; and |
12 | WHEREAS, Amtrak has agreed to conduct a feasibility study of |
13 | the Scranton to New York City link, known as the Lackawanna |
14 | Cutoff project; and |
15 | WHEREAS, In June 2009, the United States Environmental |
16 | Protection Agency declared a finding of no significant impact |
17 | for a new passenger rail line between Morris County, New Jersey, |
18 | and Scranton, a vital section of the Lackawanna Cutoff; and |
19 | WHEREAS, This two-decade-long effort to restore rail service |
20 | from the Poconos region to New York City therefore appears to be |
|
1 | nearing the engineering and construction funding phase; and |
2 | WHEREAS, Several extensions of this service have already been |
3 | proposed and are being seriously considered, including north to |
4 | Binghamton, New York; and |
5 | WHEREAS, A previously commissioned, federally funded study |
6 | conducted by the Redevelopment Authority of Luzerne County |
7 | determined that the physical track alignment is already in place |
8 | to do so, thus requiring no additional right-of-way; and |
9 | WHEREAS, The citizens of Luzerne County deserve the same |
10 | consideration and opportunity for employment, as well as other |
11 | economic opportunities that would be afforded to the |
12 | municipalities that the passenger line would serve, as it is now |
13 | proposed; and |
14 | WHEREAS, Establishing passenger service between Wilkes-Barre |
15 | and Scranton could also benefit economic development efforts in |
16 | the greater Hazleton area should service eventually be extended |
17 | to that region; and |
18 | WHEREAS, Pennsylvania would be remiss in not determining if |
19 | the continuation of this rail service on to Wilkes-Barre is |
20 | feasible at this pivotal juncture, especially considering the |
21 | relatively short distance and minimal expense incurred in doing |
22 | so; therefore be it |
23 | RESOLVED, That the Senate direct the Legislative Budget and |
24 | Finance Committee to conduct a study to determine if the |
25 | benefits outweigh the costs of providing passenger rail service |
26 | from Wilkes-Barre to Scranton in conjunction with the Lackawanna |
27 | Cutoff project; and be it further |
28 | RESOLVED, That the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee |
29 | study include a review of the: |
30 | (1) Alignment and trackage necessary to provide |
|
1 | passenger rail service between Wilkes-Barre and Scranton. |
2 | (2) Preferred ownership and management structure and |
3 | operational requirements to provide such service. |
4 | (3) Anticipated ridership for Wilkes-Barre to Scranton |
5 | passenger rail service; |
6 | and be it further |
7 | RESOLVED, That the committee issue its report to the |
8 | Secretary of the Senate within one year from the date of |
9 | adoption of this resolution. |
|