Bill Text: TX HB2015 | 2015-2016 | 84th Legislature | Introduced
Bill Title: Relating to employment termination for falsification of military record in obtaining employment or employment benefits.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2015-03-17 - Referred to Defense & Veterans' Affairs [HB2015 Detail]
Download: Texas-2015-HB2015-Introduced.html
84R5998 KSD-D | ||
By: Sheets | H.B. No. 2015 |
|
||
|
||
relating to employment termination for falsification of military | ||
record in obtaining employment or employment benefits. | ||
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: | ||
SECTION 1. This Act shall be known as the Stolen Valor Act. | ||
SECTION 2. Title 3, Labor Code, is amended by adding Chapter | ||
105 to read as follows: | ||
CHAPTER 105. EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION FOR FALSIFICATION | ||
OF MILITARY RECORD IN OBTAINING EMPLOYMENT OR EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS | ||
Sec. 105.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: | ||
(1) "Employee" means an individual who is employed by | ||
an employer for compensation. | ||
(2) "Employer" means a person who employs one or more | ||
employees. | ||
(3) "Military record" has the meaning assigned by | ||
Section 32.54, Penal Code. | ||
Sec. 105.002. EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION; EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT | ||
VOID AND UNENFORCEABLE. (a) An employer may discharge an employee, | ||
regardless of whether the employee is employed under an employment | ||
contract with the employer, if the employer determines, based on a | ||
reasonable belief, that the employee, in obtaining the employee's | ||
employment or any benefit relating to the employee's employment, | ||
falsified or otherwise misrepresented any information regarding | ||
the employee's military record in a manner that would constitute an | ||
offense under Section 32.54, Penal Code. | ||
(b) An employment contract entered into by an employer with | ||
an employee discharged by the employer under this section is void | ||
and unenforceable as against public policy. | ||
Sec. 105.003. SUIT TO APPEAL TERMINATION. An employee who | ||
was employed by an employer under an employment contract on the date | ||
of the employee's termination and who believes the employee was | ||
wrongfully terminated under Section 105.002 may bring suit against | ||
the employer in a district court in the county in which the | ||
termination occurred for appropriate relief, including rehiring or | ||
reinstatement to the employee's previous job, payment of back | ||
wages, and reestablishment of employee benefits to which the | ||
employee otherwise would have been eligible if the employee had not | ||
been terminated. | ||
SECTION 3. Chapter 105, Labor Code, as added by this Act, | ||
applies only to an employee termination that occurs on or after the | ||
effective date of this Act. | ||
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2015. |