Bill Text: VA SB1398 | 2011 | Regular Session | Introduced
Bill Title: Coalbed methane gas; conflicting claims to ownership.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2011-02-02 - Senate: Failed to report (defeated) in Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources (7-Y 7-N) [SB1398 Detail]
Download: Virginia-2011-SB1398-Introduced.html
11104060D Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That § 45.1-361.22 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows: § 45.1-361.22. Pooling of interests for coalbed methane gas wells; conflicting claims to ownership. A. When there are conflicting claims to the ownership of coalbed methane gas, the Board, upon application from any claimant, shall enter an order pooling all interests or estates in the coalbed methane gas drilling unit for the development and operation thereof. In order to establish a conflicting claim to the ownership to coalbed methane gas pursuant to this section, a claimant who is not the surface owner shall submit the document by which the interest in coalbed methane gas was severed from the surface estate and identify with specificity the writing that conveys such interest. Pursuant to § 45.1-361.21:1, the Board shall not find a conflicting claim to the ownership to coalbed methane gas pursuant to this section if the writing identified by such claimant fails to show a severance of mineral interests other than coal. An affirmative determination by the Board to find a conflicting claim to the ownership of coalbed methane gas pursuant to this subsection and to place the royalties attributable to such claims into an escrow account shall be considered a case decision as defined in § 2.2-4001. B. In addition to the provisions of § 45.1-361.21, the following provisions shall apply to pooling orders entered by the Board under this section: 1. Simultaneously with the filing of such application, the gas or oil owner applying for the order shall provide notice pursuant to the provisions of § 45.1-361.19 to each person identified by the applicant as a potential owner of an interest in the coalbed methane gas underlying the tract which is the subject of the hearing. 2. The Board shall cause to be established an escrow account into which the payment for costs or proceeds attributable to the conflicting interests shall be deposited and held for the interest of the claimants. 3. The coalbed methane gas well operator shall deposit into the escrow account any money paid by a person claiming a contested ownership interest as a participating operator's share of costs pursuant to the provisions of § 45.1-361.21 and the order of the Board. 4. The coalbed methane gas well operator shall deposit into the escrow account one-eighth of all proceeds attributable to the conflicting interests plus all proceeds in excess of ongoing operational expenses as provided for under § 45.1-361.21 and the order of the Board attributable to a participating or nonparticipating operator. 5. The Board shall order payment of principal and accrued
interest, less escrow account fees, from the escrow account to conflicting
claimants only after (i) a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction
adjudicating the ownership of coalbed methane gas as between them; (ii) a
determination reached by an arbitrator pursuant to § 45.1-361.22:1; 6. Any person who does not make an election under the pooling order shall be deemed, subject to a final legal determination of ownership, to have leased his gas or oil interest to the coalbed methane gas well operator as the pooling order may provide. C. Upon the request of a claimant, the Board or a hearing officer appointed by the Board shall review any pooling order entered pursuant to this section prior to July 1, 2011, to ensure that a conflicting claim to the ownership of coalbed methane gas meets the threshold requirements set forth in subsection A. The Board shall order payment of principal and accrued interest, less escrow account fees, from the escrow account to the owner of the surface estate if, upon its own review or the recommendation of a hearing officer, it finds that the claims to ownership fail to meet the threshold requirements set forth in subsection A to establish such a conflict with the surface estate. An affirmative determination by the Board to confirm a finding of a conflicting claim to the ownership of coalbed methane gas shall be considered a case decision as defined in § 2.2-4001.
|