Bill Text: FL S1730 | 2019 | Regular Session | Introduced
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Community Development and Housing
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (? 3-1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-05-02 - Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 207 (Ch. 2019-106), CS/CS/HB 7103 (Ch. 2019-165) [S1730 Detail]
Download: Florida-2019-S1730-Introduced.html
Bill Title: Community Development and Housing
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (? 3-1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-05-02 - Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 207 (Ch. 2019-106), CS/CS/HB 7103 (Ch. 2019-165) [S1730 Detail]
Download: Florida-2019-S1730-Introduced.html
Florida Senate - 2019 SB 1730 By Senator Lee 20-01705A-19 20191730__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to growth management; amending s. 3 125.01055, F.S.; prohibiting a county from adopting or 4 imposing a requirement in any form relating to 5 affordable housing which has specified effects; 6 providing construction; amending s. 125.022, F.S.; 7 requiring that a county review the application for 8 completeness and issue a certain letter within a 9 specified period after receiving an application for 10 approval of a development permit or development order; 11 providing procedures for addressing deficiencies in, 12 and for approving or denying, the application; 13 conforming provisions to changes made by the act; 14 defining the term “development order”; amending s. 15 163.3180, F.S.; requiring a local government to credit 16 certain contributions, constructions, expansions, or 17 payments toward any other impact fee or exaction 18 imposed by local ordinance for public educational 19 facilities; providing requirements for the basis of 20 the credit; amending s. 163.31801, F.S.; adding 21 minimum conditions that certain impact fees must 22 satisfy; requiring that, under certain circumstances, 23 a holder of certain impact fee or mobility fee credits 24 receive the full value of the credit as of the date it 25 was first established based on the impact fee or 26 mobility fee rate that was in effect on such date; 27 providing that the government, in certain actions, has 28 the burden of proving by a preponderance of the 29 evidence that the imposition or amount of impact fees 30 or required dollar-for-dollar credits for the payment 31 of impact fees meets certain requirements; prohibiting 32 the court from using a deferential standard for the 33 benefit of the government; authorizing the court to 34 award attorney fees and costs to the prevailing party 35 in any action challenging an impact fee; requiring 36 that the court award attorney fees and costs to a 37 prevailing property owner if the court makes specified 38 determinations regarding the impact fee; providing 39 applicability; prohibiting a local government from 40 imposing concurrency mitigation conditions of any kind 41 on a project if the government does not provide 42 certain required credits; prohibiting a local 43 government, beginning on a specified date, from 44 charging an impact fee for the development or 45 construction of housing that is affordable; amending 46 s. 166.033, F.S.; requiring that a municipality review 47 the application for completeness and issue a certain 48 letter within a specified period after receiving an 49 application for approval of a development permit or 50 development order; providing procedures for addressing 51 deficiencies in, and for approving or denying, the 52 application; conforming provisions to changes made by 53 the act; defining the term “development order”; 54 amending s. 166.04151, F.S.; prohibiting a 55 municipality from adopting or imposing a requirement 56 in any form relating to affordable housing which has 57 specified effects; providing construction; providing 58 an effective date. 59 60 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 61 62 Section 1. Section 125.01055, Florida Statutes, is amended 63 to read: 64 125.01055 Affordable housing.— 65 (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a county 66 may adopt and maintain in effect any law, ordinance, rule, or 67 other measure that is adopted for the purpose of increasing the 68 supply of affordable housing using land use mechanisms such as 69 inclusionary housing ordinances. A county may not, however, 70 adopt or impose a requirement in any form, including, without 71 limitation, by way of a comprehensive plan amendment, ordinance, 72 or land development regulation or as a condition of a 73 development order or development permit, which has any of the 74 following effects: 75 (a) Mandating or establishing a maximum sales price or 76 lease rental for privately produced dwelling units. 77 (b) Requiring the allocation or designation, whether 78 directly or indirectly, of privately produced dwelling units for 79 sale or rental to any particular class or group of purchasers or 80 tenants. 81 (c) Requiring the provision of any on-site or off-site 82 workforce or affordable housing units or a contribution of land 83 or money for such housing, including, but not limited to, the 84 payment of any flat or percentage-based fee, whether calculated 85 on the basis of the number of approved dwelling units, the 86 amount of approved square footage, or otherwise. 87 (2) This section does not limit the authority of a county 88 to create or implement a voluntary density bonus program or any 89 other voluntary incentive-based program designed to increase the 90 supply of workforce or affordable housing units. 91 Section 2. Section 125.022, Florida Statutes, is amended to 92 read: 93 125.022 Development permits and orders.— 94 (1) Within 30 days after receiving an application for a 95 development permit or development order, a county must review 96 the application for completeness and issue a letter indicating 97 that all required information is submitted or specifying with 98 particularity any areas that are deficient. If deficient, the 99 applicant has 30 days to address the deficiencies by submitting 100 the required additional information. Within 90 days after the 101 initial submission, if complete, or the supplemental submission, 102 whichever is later, the county shall approve, approve with 103 conditions, or deny the application for a development permit or 104 development order. The time periods contained in this section 105 may be waived in writing by the applicant. An approval, approval 106 with conditions, or denial of the application for a development 107 permit or development order must include written findings 108 supporting the county’s decision. 109 (2)(1)When reviewing an application for a development 110 permit or development order that is certified by a professional 111 listed in s. 403.0877, a county may not request additional 112 information from the applicant more than three times, unless the 113 applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third 114 request for additional information, the applicant must be 115 offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 116 Except as provided in subsection (5)(4), if the applicant 117 believes the request for additional information is not 118 authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal 119 authority, the county, at the applicant’s request, shall proceed 120 to process the application for approval or denial. 121 (3)(2)When a county denies an application for a 122 development permit or development order, the county shall give 123 written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a 124 citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, 125 statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit 126 or order. 127 (4)(3)As used in this section, the termsterm“development 128 permit” and “development order” havehasthe same meaning as in 129 s. 163.3164, but dodoesnot include building permits. 130 (5)(4)For any development permit application filed with 131 the county after July 1, 2012, a county may not require as a 132 condition of processing or issuing a development permit or 133 development order that an applicant obtain a permit or approval 134 from any state or federal agency unless the agency has issued a 135 final agency action that denies the federal or state permit 136 before the county action on the local development permit. 137 (6)(5)Issuance of a development permit or development 138 order by a county does not in any way create any rights on the 139 part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal 140 agency and does not create any liability on the part of the 141 county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to 142 obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by 143 a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a 144 violation of state or federal law. A county shall attach such a 145 disclaimer to the issuance of a development permit and shall 146 include a permit condition that all other applicable state or 147 federal permits be obtained before commencement of the 148 development. 149 (7)(6)This section does not prohibit a county from 150 providing information to an applicant regarding what other state 151 or federal permits may apply. 152 Section 3. Paragraph (h) of subsection (6) of section 153 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: 154 163.3180 Concurrency.— 155 (6) 156 (h)1. In order to limit the liability of local governments, 157 a local government may allow a landowner to proceed with 158 development of a specific parcel of land notwithstanding a 159 failure of the development to satisfy school concurrency, if all 160 the following factors are shown to exist: 161 a. The proposed development would be consistent with the 162 future land use designation for the specific property and with 163 pertinent portions of the adopted local plan, as determined by 164 the local government. 165 b. The local government’s capital improvements element and 166 the school board’s educational facilities plan provide for 167 school facilities adequate to serve the proposed development, 168 and the local government or school board has not implemented 169 that element or the project includes a plan that demonstrates 170 that the capital facilities needed as a result of the project 171 can be reasonably provided. 172 c. The local government and school board have provided a 173 means by which the landowner will be assessed a proportionate 174 share of the cost of providing the school facilities necessary 175 to serve the proposed development. 176 2. If a local government applies school concurrency, it may 177 not deny an application for site plan, final subdivision 178 approval, or the functional equivalent for a development or 179 phase of a development authorizing residential development for 180 failure to achieve and maintain the level-of-service standard 181 for public school capacity in a local school concurrency 182 management system where adequate school facilities will be in 183 place or under actual construction within 3 years after the 184 issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval, or the 185 functional equivalent. School concurrency is satisfied if the 186 developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide 187 mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school 188 facilities to be created by actual development of the property, 189 including, but not limited to, the options described in sub 190 subparagraph a. Options for proportionate-share mitigation of 191 impacts on public school facilities must be established in the 192 comprehensive plan and the interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 193 163.31777. 194 a. Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution 195 of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land 196 acquisition or construction of a public school facility; the 197 construction of a charter school that complies with the 198 requirements of s. 1002.33(18); or the creation of mitigation 199 banking based on the construction of a public school facility in 200 exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options 201 must include execution by the applicant and the local government 202 of a development agreement that constitutes a legally binding 203 commitment to pay proportionate-share mitigation for the 204 additional residential units approved by the local government in 205 a development order and actually developed on the property, 206 taking into account residential density allowed on the property 207 prior to the plan amendment that increased the overall 208 residential density. The district school board must be a party 209 to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a 210 development agreement, the local government may require the 211 landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon 212 its expiration. 213 b. If the interlocal agreement and the local government 214 comprehensive plan authorize a contribution of land; the 215 construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; the 216 construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a 217 portion thereof; or the construction of a charter school that 218 complies with the requirements of s. 1002.33(18), as 219 proportionate-share mitigation, the local government shall 220 credit such a contribution, construction, expansion, or payment 221 toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local 222 ordinance for public educational facilitiesthe same need, on a 223 dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value. The credit must be 224 based on the total impact fee assessed and not upon the impact 225 fee for any particular type of school. 226 c. Any proportionate-share mitigation must be directed by 227 the school board toward a school capacity improvement identified 228 in the 5-year school board educational facilities plan that 229 satisfies the demands created by the development in accordance 230 with a binding developer’s agreement. 231 3. This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local 232 government to deny a development permit or its functional 233 equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except 234 as provided in this part. 235 Section 4. Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, is amended 236 to read: 237 163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; minimum 238 requirements; audits; challengesdefinitions; ordinances levying239impact fees.— 240 (1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Impact Fee 241 Act.” 242 (2) The Legislature finds that impact fees are an important 243 source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the 244 infrastructure necessitated by new growth. The Legislature 245 further finds that impact fees are an outgrowth of the home rule 246 power of a local government to provide certain services within 247 its jurisdiction. Due to the growth of impact fee collections 248 and local governments’ reliance on impact fees, it is the intent 249 of the Legislature to ensure that, when a county or municipality 250 adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district adopts 251 an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies 252 with this section. 253 (3) At a minimum, an impact fee adopted by ordinance of a 254 county or municipality or by resolution of a special district 255 must satisfy all of the following conditions, at minimum: 256 (a)Require thatThe calculation of the impact fee must be 257 based on the most recent and localized data. 258 (b) The local government must provide for accounting and 259 reporting of impact fee collections and expenditures. If a local 260 governmental entity imposes an impact fee to address its 261 infrastructure needs, the entity mustshallaccount for the 262 revenues and expenditures of such impact fee in a separate 263 accounting fund. 264 (c)LimitAdministrative charges for the collection of 265 impact fees must be limited to actual costs. 266 (d) The local government must provideRequire thatnotice 267 notbe provided noless than 90 days before the effective date 268 of an ordinance or resolution imposing a new or increased impact 269 fee. A county or municipality is not required to wait 90 days to 270 decrease, suspend, or eliminate an impact fee. 271 (e) Collection of the impact fee may not be required to 272 occur earlier than the date of issuance of the building permit 273 for the property that is subject to the fee. 274 (f) The impact fee must be proportional and reasonably 275 connected to, or have a rational nexus with, the need for 276 additional capital facilities and the increased impact generated 277 by the new residential or commercial construction. 278 (g) The impact fee must be proportional and reasonably 279 connected to, or have a rational nexus with, the expenditures of 280 the funds collected and the benefits accruing to the new 281 residential or nonresidential construction. 282 (h) The local government must specifically earmark funds 283 collected under the impact fee for use in acquiring, 284 constructing, or improving capital facilities to benefit new 285 users. 286 (i) Revenues generated by the impact fee may not be used, 287 in whole or in part, to pay existing debt or for previously 288 approved projects unless the expenditure is reasonably connected 289 to, or has a rational nexus with, the increased impact generated 290 by the new residential or nonresidential construction. 291 (j) The local government must credit against the collection 292 of the impact fee any contributions related to public 293 educational facilities, including, but not limited to, land 294 dedication, site planning and design, and construction, whether 295 provided in a proportionate share agreement or any other form of 296 exaction. Any such contributions must be applied to reduce 297 impact fees on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value. 298 If the local government adjusts the amount of impact fees 299 assessed, outstanding and unused credits must be adjusted 300 accordingly. 301 (4) If the holder of impact fee or mobility fee credits 302 granted by a local government, whether granted under this 303 section, s. 380.06, or otherwise, uses such credits in lieu of 304 the actual payment of an impact fee or mobility fee, the holder 305 of those credits must, whenever they are utilized, receive the 306 full value of the credit as of the date on which it was first 307 established based on the impact fee or mobility fee rate that 308 was in effect on such date. 309 (5)(4)Audits of financial statements of local governmental 310 entities and district school boards which are performed by a 311 certified public accountant pursuant to s. 218.39 and submitted 312 to the Auditor General must include an affidavit signed by the 313 chief financial officer of the local governmental entity or 314 district school board stating that the local governmental entity 315 or district school board has complied with this section. 316 (6)(a)(5)In any action challenging an impact fee or the 317 government’s failure to provide required dollar-for-dollar 318 credits for the payment of impact fees as provided in s. 319 163.3180(6)(h)2.b, the government has the burden of proving by a 320 preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of 321 the fee or credit meets the requirements of state legal 322 precedentorand this section. The court may not use a 323 deferential standard for the benefit of the government. 324 (b) In any action challenging an impact fee, the court may 325 award attorney fees and costs to the prevailing party. However, 326 the court must award attorney fees and costs to a prevailing 327 property owner if the court determines that the impact fee is 328 not: 329 1. Reasonably connected to, or does not have a rational 330 nexus with, the need for additional capital facilities and the 331 increased impact generated by the new residential or 332 nonresidential construction; 333 2. Reasonably connected to, or does not have a rational 334 nexus with, the expenditures of the funds collected and the 335 benefits accruing to the new residential or nonresidential 336 construction; or 337 3. Proportionate to and exceeds the impacts of the proposed 338 use that the governmental entity seeks to avoid, minimize, or 339 mitigate. 340 (7) This section applies to mobility fees adopted pursuant 341 to s. 163.3180(5)(i). 342 (8) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this 343 chapter, if a local government does not provide the credit 344 required in subsection (3)(j) for a project, then the local 345 government may not impose concurrency mitigation conditions of 346 any kind on the project. 347 (9) Beginning July 1, 2019, a local government may not 348 charge an impact fee for the development or construction of 349 housing that is affordable, as defined in s. 420.9071. 350 Section 5. Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, is amended to 351 read: 352 166.033 Development permits and orders.— 353 (1) Within 30 days after receiving an application for 354 approval of a development permit or development order, a 355 municipality must review the application for completeness and 356 issue a letter indicating that all required information is 357 submitted or specifying with particularity any areas that are 358 deficient. If deficient, the applicant has 30 days to address 359 the deficiencies by submitting the required additional 360 information. Within 90 days of the initial submission, if 361 complete, or the supplemental submission, whichever is later, 362 the municipality must approve, approve with conditions, or deny 363 the application for a development permit or development order. 364 The time periods contained in this subsection may be waived in 365 writing by the applicant. An approval, approval with conditions, 366 or denial of the application for a development permit or 367 development order must include written findings supporting the 368 municipality’s decision. 369 (2)(1)When reviewing an application for a development 370 permit or development order that is certified by a professional 371 listed in s. 403.0877, a municipality may not request additional 372 information from the applicant more than three times, unless the 373 applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third 374 request for additional information, the applicant must be 375 offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 376 Except as provided in subsection (5)(4), if the applicant 377 believes the request for additional information is not 378 authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal 379 authority, the municipality, at the applicant’s request, shall 380 proceed to process the application for approval or denial. 381 (3)(2)When a municipality denies an application for a 382 development permit or development order, the municipality shall 383 give written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a 384 citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, 385 statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit 386 or order. 387 (4)(3)As used in this section, the termsterm“development 388 permit” and “development order” havehasthe same meaning as in 389 s. 163.3164, but dodoesnot include building permits. 390 (5)(4)For any development permit application filed with 391 the municipality after July 1, 2012, a municipality may not 392 require as a condition of processing or issuing a development 393 permit or development order that an applicant obtain a permit or 394 approval from any state or federal agency unless the agency has 395 issued a final agency action that denies the federal or state 396 permit before the municipal action on the local development 397 permit. 398 (6)(5)Issuance of a development permit or development 399 order by a municipality does notin any waycreate any right on 400 the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or 401 federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of 402 the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant 403 fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations 404 imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that 405 result in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality 406 shall attach such a disclaimer to the issuance of development 407 permits and shall include a permit condition that all other 408 applicable state or federal permits be obtained before 409 commencement of the development. 410 (7)(6)This section does not prohibit a municipality from 411 providing information to an applicant regarding what other state 412 or federal permits may apply. 413 Section 6. Section 166.04151, Florida Statutes, is amended 414 to read: 415 166.04151 Affordable housing.— 416 (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 417 municipality may adopt and maintain in effect any law, 418 ordinance, rule, or other measure that is adopted for the 419 purpose of increasing the supply of affordable housing using 420 land use mechanisms such as inclusionary housing ordinances. A 421 municipality may not, however, adopt or impose a requirement in 422 any form, including, without limitation, by way of a 423 comprehensive plan amendment, ordinance, or land development 424 regulation or as a condition of a development order or 425 development permit, which has any of the following effects: 426 (a) Mandating or establishing a maximum sales price or 427 lease rental for privately produced dwelling units. 428 (b) Requiring the allocation or designation, whether 429 directly or indirectly, of privately produced dwelling units for 430 sale or rental to any particular class or group of purchasers or 431 tenants. 432 (c) Requiring the provision of any on-site or off-site 433 workforce or affordable housing units or a contribution of land 434 or money for such housing, including, but not limited to, the 435 payment of any flat or percentage-based fee whether calculated 436 on the basis of the number of approved dwelling units, the 437 amount of approved square footage, or otherwise. 438 (2) This section does not limit the authority of a 439 municipality to create or implement a voluntary density bonus 440 program or any other voluntary incentive-based program designed 441 to increase the supply of workforce or affordable housing units. 442 Section 7. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.