Bill Text: FL S1730 | 2019 | Regular Session | Comm Sub
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Community Development and Housing
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (? 3-1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-05-02 - Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 207 (Ch. 2019-106), CS/CS/HB 7103 (Ch. 2019-165) [S1730 Detail]
Download: Florida-2019-S1730-Comm_Sub.html
Bill Title: Community Development and Housing
Spectrum: Slight Partisan Bill (? 3-1)
Status: (Introduced - Dead) 2019-05-02 - Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 207 (Ch. 2019-106), CS/CS/HB 7103 (Ch. 2019-165) [S1730 Detail]
Download: Florida-2019-S1730-Comm_Sub.html
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for CS for SB 1730 By the Committees on Infrastructure and Security; and Community Affairs; and Senator Lee 596-04073A-19 20191730c2 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to community development and housing; 3 amending s. 125.01055, F.S.; authorizing an 4 inclusionary housing ordinance to require a developer 5 to provide a specified number or percentage of 6 affordable housing units to be included in a 7 development or allow a developer to contribute to a 8 housing fund or other alternatives; requiring a county 9 to provide certain incentives to fully offset all 10 costs to the developer of its affordable housing 11 contribution; amending s. 125.022, F.S.; requiring 12 that a county review the application for completeness 13 and issue a certain letter within a specified period 14 after receiving an application for approval of a 15 development permit or development order; providing 16 procedures for addressing deficiencies in, and for 17 approving or denying, the application; conforming 18 provisions to changes made by the act; defining the 19 term “development order”; amending s. 163.3180, F.S.; 20 revising compliance requirements for a mobility fee 21 based funding system; requiring a local government to 22 credit certain contributions, constructions, 23 expansions, or payments toward any other impact fee or 24 exaction imposed by local ordinance for public 25 educational facilities; providing requirements for the 26 basis of the credit; amending s. 163.31801, F.S.; 27 adding minimum conditions that certain impact fees 28 must satisfy; requiring a local government to credit 29 against the collection of an impact fee any 30 contribution related to public education facilities, 31 subject to certain requirements; requiring the holder 32 of certain impact fee credits to be entitled to a 33 proportionate increase in the credit balance if a 34 local government increases its impact fee rates; 35 providing that the government, in certain actions, has 36 the burden of proving by a preponderance of the 37 evidence that the imposition or amount of certain 38 required dollar-for-dollar credits for the payment of 39 impact fees meets certain requirements; prohibiting 40 the court from using a deferential standard for the 41 benefit of the government; authorizing a county, 42 municipality, or special district to provide an 43 exception or waiver for an impact fee for the 44 development or construction of housing that is 45 affordable; providing that if a county, municipality, 46 or special district provides such an exception or 47 waiver, it is not required to use any revenues to 48 offset the impact; amending s. 166.033, F.S.; 49 requiring that a municipality review the application 50 for completeness and issue a certain letter within a 51 specified period after receiving an application for 52 approval of a development permit or development order; 53 providing procedures for addressing deficiencies in, 54 and for approving or denying, the application; 55 conforming provisions to changes made by the act; 56 defining the term “development order”; amending s. 57 166.04151, F.S.; authorizing an inclusionary housing 58 ordinance to require a developer to provide a 59 specified number or percentage of affordable housing 60 units to be included in a development or allow a 61 developer to contribute to a housing fund or other 62 alternatives; requiring a municipality to provide 63 certain incentives to fully offset all costs to the 64 developer of its affordable housing contribution; 65 amending s. 494.001, F.S.; revising the definition of 66 the term “mortgage loan”; providing an effective date. 67 68 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 69 70 Section 1. Section 125.01055, Florida Statutes, is amended 71 to read: 72 125.01055 Affordable housing.— 73 (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a county 74 may adopt and maintain in effect any law, ordinance, rule, or 75 other measure that is adopted for the purpose of increasing the 76 supply of affordable housing using land use mechanisms such as 77 inclusionary housing ordinances. 78 (2) An inclusionary housing ordinance may require a 79 developer to provide a specified number or percentage of 80 affordable housing units to be included in a development or 81 allow a developer to contribute to a housing fund or other 82 alternatives in lieu of building the affordable housing units. 83 However, in exchange, a county must provide incentives to fully 84 offset all costs to the developer of its affordable housing 85 contribution. Such incentives may include, but are not limited 86 to: 87 (a) Allowing the developer density or intensity bonus 88 incentives or more floor space than allowed under the current or 89 proposed future land use designation or zoning; 90 (b) Reducing or waiving fees, such as impact fees or water 91 and sewer charges; or 92 (c) Granting other incentives. 93 Section 2. Section 125.022, Florida Statutes, is amended to 94 read: 95 125.022 Development permits and orders.— 96 (1) Within 30 days after receiving an application for 97 approval of a development permit or development order, a county 98 must review the application for completeness and issue a letter 99 indicating that all required information is submitted or 100 specifying with particularity any areas that are deficient. If 101 the application is deficient, the applicant has 30 days to 102 address the deficiencies by submitting the required additional 103 information. Within 120 days after the county has deemed the 104 application complete, the county must approve, approve with 105 conditions, or deny the application for a development permit or 106 development order. The time periods contained in this section 107 may be waived in writing by the applicant. An approval, approval 108 with conditions, or denial of the application for a development 109 permit or development order must include written findings 110 supporting the county’s decision. 111 (2)(1)When reviewing an application for a development 112 permit or development order that is certified by a professional 113 listed in s. 403.0877, a county may not request additional 114 information from the applicant more than three times, unless the 115 applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third 116 request for additional information, the applicant must be 117 offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 118 Except as provided in subsection (5)(4), if the applicant 119 believes the request for additional information is not 120 authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal 121 authority, the county, at the applicant’s request, shall proceed 122 to process the application for approval or denial. 123 (3)(2)When a county denies an application for a 124 development permit or development order, the county shall give 125 written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a 126 citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, 127 statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit 128 or order. 129 (4)(3)As used in this section, the termsterm“development 130 permit” and “development order” havehasthe same meaning as in 131 s. 163.3164, but dodoesnot include building permits. 132 (5)(4)For any development permit application filed with 133 the county after July 1, 2012, a county may not require as a 134 condition of processing or issuing a development permit or 135 development order that an applicant obtain a permit or approval 136 from any state or federal agency unless the agency has issued a 137 final agency action that denies the federal or state permit 138 before the county action on the local development permit. 139 (6)(5)Issuance of a development permit or development 140 order by a county does not in any way create any rights on the 141 part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal 142 agency and does not create any liability on the part of the 143 county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to 144 obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by 145 a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a 146 violation of state or federal law. A county shall attach such a 147 disclaimer to the issuance of a development permit and shall 148 include a permit condition that all other applicable state or 149 federal permits be obtained before commencement of the 150 development. 151 (7)(6)This section does not prohibit a county from 152 providing information to an applicant regarding what other state 153 or federal permits may apply. 154 Section 3. Paragraph (i) of subsection (5) and paragraph 155 (h) of subsection (6) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are 156 amended to read: 157 163.3180 Concurrency.— 158 (5) 159 (i) If a local government elects to repeal transportation 160 concurrency, it is encouraged to adopt an alternative mobility 161 funding system that uses one or more of the tools and techniques 162 identified in paragraph (f). Any alternative mobility funding 163 system adopted may not be used to deny, time, or phase an 164 application for site plan approval, plat approval, final 165 subdivision approval, building permits, or the functional 166 equivalent of such approvals provided that the developer agrees 167 to pay for the development’s identified transportation impacts 168 via the funding mechanism implemented by the local government. 169 The revenue from the funding mechanism used in the alternative 170 system must be used to implement the needs of the local 171 government’s plan which serves as the basis for the fee imposed. 172 A mobility fee-based funding system must comply with s. 173 163.31801 governingthe dual rational nexus test applicable to174 impact fees. An alternative system that is not mobility fee 175 based shall not be applied in a manner that imposes upon new 176 development any responsibility for funding an existing 177 transportation deficiency as defined in paragraph (h). 178 (6) 179 (h)1. In order to limit the liability of local governments, 180 a local government may allow a landowner to proceed with 181 development of a specific parcel of land notwithstanding a 182 failure of the development to satisfy school concurrency, if all 183 the following factors are shown to exist: 184 a. The proposed development would be consistent with the 185 future land use designation for the specific property and with 186 pertinent portions of the adopted local plan, as determined by 187 the local government. 188 b. The local government’s capital improvements element and 189 the school board’s educational facilities plan provide for 190 school facilities adequate to serve the proposed development, 191 and the local government or school board has not implemented 192 that element or the project includes a plan that demonstrates 193 that the capital facilities needed as a result of the project 194 can be reasonably provided. 195 c. The local government and school board have provided a 196 means by which the landowner will be assessed a proportionate 197 share of the cost of providing the school facilities necessary 198 to serve the proposed development. 199 2. If a local government applies school concurrency, it may 200 not deny an application for site plan, final subdivision 201 approval, or the functional equivalent for a development or 202 phase of a development authorizing residential development for 203 failure to achieve and maintain the level-of-service standard 204 for public school capacity in a local school concurrency 205 management system where adequate school facilities will be in 206 place or under actual construction within 3 years after the 207 issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval, or the 208 functional equivalent. School concurrency is satisfied if the 209 developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide 210 mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school 211 facilities to be created by actual development of the property, 212 including, but not limited to, the options described in sub 213 subparagraph a. Options for proportionate-share mitigation of 214 impacts on public school facilities must be established in the 215 comprehensive plan and the interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 216 163.31777. 217 a. Appropriate mitigation options include the contribution 218 of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land 219 acquisition or construction of a public school facility; the 220 construction of a charter school that complies with the 221 requirements of s. 1002.33(18); or the creation of mitigation 222 banking based on the construction of a public school facility in 223 exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Such options 224 must include execution by the applicant and the local government 225 of a development agreement that constitutes a legally binding 226 commitment to pay proportionate-share mitigation for the 227 additional residential units approved by the local government in 228 a development order and actually developed on the property, 229 taking into account residential density allowed on the property 230 prior to the plan amendment that increased the overall 231 residential density. The district school board must be a party 232 to such an agreement. As a condition of its entry into such a 233 development agreement, the local government may require the 234 landowner to agree to continuing renewal of the agreement upon 235 its expiration. 236 b. If the interlocal agreement and the local government 237 comprehensive plan authorize a contribution of land; the 238 construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition; the 239 construction or expansion of a public school facility, or a 240 portion thereof; or the construction of a charter school that 241 complies with the requirements of s. 1002.33(18), as 242 proportionate-share mitigation, the local government shall 243 credit such a contribution, construction, expansion, or payment 244 toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local 245 ordinance for public educational facilitiesthe same need, on a 246 dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value. The credit must be 247 based on the total impact fee assessed and not on the impact fee 248 for any particular type of school. 249 c. Any proportionate-share mitigation must be directed by 250 the school board toward a school capacity improvement identified 251 in the 5-year school board educational facilities plan that 252 satisfies the demands created by the development in accordance 253 with a binding developer’s agreement. 254 3. This paragraph does not limit the authority of a local 255 government to deny a development permit or its functional 256 equivalent pursuant to its home rule regulatory powers, except 257 as provided in this part. 258 Section 4. Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, is amended 259 to read: 260 163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; minimum 261 requirements; audits; challengesdefinitions; ordinances levying262impact fees.— 263 (1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Impact Fee 264 Act.” 265 (2) The Legislature finds that impact fees are an important 266 source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the 267 infrastructure necessitated by new growth. The Legislature 268 further finds that impact fees are an outgrowth of the home rule 269 power of a local government to provide certain services within 270 its jurisdiction. Due to the growth of impact fee collections 271 and local governments’ reliance on impact fees, it is the intent 272 of the Legislature to ensure that, when a county or municipality 273 adopts an impact fee by ordinance or a special district adopts 274 an impact fee by resolution, the governing authority complies 275 with this section. 276 (3) At a minimum, an impact fee adopted by ordinance of a 277 county or municipality or by resolution of a special district 278 must satisfy all of the following conditions, at minimum: 279 (a)Require thatThe calculation of the impact fee must be 280 based on the most recent and localized data. 281 (b) The local government must provide for accounting and 282 reporting of impact fee collections and expenditures. If a local 283 governmental entity imposes an impact fee to address its 284 infrastructure needs, the entity mustshallaccount for the 285 revenues and expenditures of such impact fee in a separate 286 accounting fund. 287 (c)LimitAdministrative charges for the collection of 288 impact fees must be limited to actual costs. 289 (d) The local government must provideRequire thatnotice 290 notbe provided noless than 90 days before the effective date 291 of an ordinance or resolution imposing a new or increased impact 292 fee. A county or municipality is not required to wait 90 days to 293 decrease, suspend, or eliminate an impact fee. 294 (e) Collection of the impact fee may not be required to 295 occur earlier than the date of issuance of the building permit 296 for the property that is subject to the fee. 297 (f) The impact fee must be proportional and reasonably 298 connected to, or have a rational nexus with, the need for 299 additional capital facilities and the increased impact generated 300 by the new residential or commercial construction. 301 (g) The impact fee must be proportional and reasonably 302 connected to, or have a rational nexus with, the expenditures of 303 the funds collected and the benefits accruing to the new 304 residential or nonresidential construction. 305 (h) The local government must specifically earmark funds 306 collected under the impact fee for use in acquiring, 307 constructing, or improving capital facilities to benefit new 308 users. 309 (i) Revenues generated by the impact fee may not be used, 310 in whole or in part, to pay existing debt or for previously 311 approved projects unless the expenditure is reasonably connected 312 to, or has a rational nexus with, the increased impact generated 313 by the new residential or nonresidential construction. 314 (4) The local government must credit against the collection 315 of the impact fee any contribution, whether identified in a 316 proportionate share agreement or other form of exaction, related 317 to public education facilities, including land dedication, site 318 planning and design, or construction. Any contribution must be 319 applied to reduce impact fees on a dollar-for-dollar basis at 320 fair market value. 321 (5) If a local government increases its impact fee rates, 322 the holder of any impact fee credits, whether such credits are 323 granted under s. 163.3180, s. 380.06, or otherwise, which were 324 in existence prior to the increase, is entitled to a 325 proportionate increase in the credit balance. 326 (6)(4)Audits of financial statements of local governmental 327 entities and district school boards which are performed by a 328 certified public accountant pursuant to s. 218.39 and submitted 329 to the Auditor General must include an affidavit signed by the 330 chief financial officer of the local governmental entity or 331 district school board stating that the local governmental entity 332 or district school board has complied with this section. 333 (7)(5)In any action challenging an impact fee or the 334 government’s failure to provide required dollar-for-dollar 335 credits for the payment of impact fees as provided in s. 336 163.3180(6)(h)2.b., the government has the burden of proving by 337 a preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of 338 the fee or credit meets the requirements of state legal 339 precedent andorthis section. The court may not use a 340 deferential standard for the benefit of the government. 341 (8) A county, municipality, or special district may provide 342 an exception or waiver for an impact fee for the development or 343 construction of housing that is affordable, as defined in s. 344 420.9071. If a county, municipality, or special district 345 provides such an exception or waiver, it is not required to use 346 any revenues to offset the impact. 347 Section 5. Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, is amended to 348 read: 349 166.033 Development permits and orders.— 350 (1) Within 30 days after receiving an application for 351 approval of a development permit or development order, a 352 municipality must review the application for completeness and 353 issue a letter indicating that all required information is 354 submitted or specifying with particularity any areas that are 355 deficient. If the application is deficient, the applicant has 30 356 days to address the deficiencies by submitting the required 357 additional information. Within 120 days after the municipality 358 has deemed the application complete, the municipality must 359 approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application for a 360 development permit or development order. The time periods 361 contained in this subsection may be waived in writing by the 362 applicant. An approval, approval with conditions, or denial of 363 the application for a development permit or development order 364 must include written findings supporting the municipality’s 365 decision. 366 (2)(1)When reviewing an application for a development 367 permit or development order that is certified by a professional 368 listed in s. 403.0877, a municipality may not request additional 369 information from the applicant more than three times, unless the 370 applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third 371 request for additional information, the applicant must be 372 offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. 373 Except as provided in subsection (5)(4), if the applicant 374 believes the request for additional information is not 375 authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal 376 authority, the municipality, at the applicant’s request, shall 377 proceed to process the application for approval or denial. 378 (3)(2)When a municipality denies an application for a 379 development permit or development order, the municipality shall 380 give written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a 381 citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, 382 statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit 383 or order. 384 (4)(3)As used in this section, the termsterm“development 385 permit” and “development order” havehasthe same meaning as in 386 s. 163.3164, but dodoesnot include building permits. 387 (5)(4)For any development permit application filed with 388 the municipality after July 1, 2012, a municipality may not 389 require as a condition of processing or issuing a development 390 permit or development order that an applicant obtain a permit or 391 approval from any state or federal agency unless the agency has 392 issued a final agency action that denies the federal or state 393 permit before the municipal action on the local development 394 permit. 395 (6)(5)Issuance of a development permit or development 396 order by a municipality does notin any waycreate any right on 397 the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or 398 federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of 399 the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant 400 fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations 401 imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that 402 result in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality 403 shall attach such a disclaimer to the issuance of development 404 permits and shall include a permit condition that all other 405 applicable state or federal permits be obtained before 406 commencement of the development. 407 (7)(6)This section does not prohibit a municipality from 408 providing information to an applicant regarding what other state 409 or federal permits may apply. 410 Section 6. Section 166.04151, Florida Statutes, is amended 411 to read: 412 166.04151 Affordable housing.— 413 (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 414 municipality may adopt and maintain in effect any law, 415 ordinance, rule, or other measure that is adopted for the 416 purpose of increasing the supply of affordable housing using 417 land use mechanisms such as inclusionary housing ordinances. 418 (2) An inclusionary housing ordinance may require a 419 developer to provide a specified number or percentage of 420 affordable housing units to be included in a development or 421 allow a developer to contribute to a housing fund or other 422 alternatives in lieu of building the affordable housing units. 423 However, in exchange, a municipality must provide incentives to 424 fully offset all costs to the developer of its affordable 425 housing contribution. Such incentives may include, but are not 426 limited to: 427 (a) Allowing the developer density or intensity bonus 428 incentives or more floor space than allowed under the current or 429 proposed future land use designation or zoning; 430 (b) Reducing or waiving fees, such as impact fees or water 431 and sewer charges; or 432 (c) Granting other incentives. 433 Section 7. Subsection (24) of section 494.001, Florida 434 Statues, is amended to read: 435 494.001 Definitions.—As used in this chapter, the term: 436 (24) “Mortgage loan” means any: 437 (a) Residential loan thatprimarily for personal, family,438or household use whichis secured by a mortgage, deed of trust, 439 or other equivalent consensual security interest on a dwelling, 440 as defined in s. 103(w)s. 103(v)of the federal Truth in 441 Lending Act, or for the purchase of residential real estate upon 442 which a dwelling is to be constructed; 443 (b) Loan on commercial real property if the borrower is an 444 individual or the lender is a noninstitutional investor; or 445 (c) Loan on improved real property consisting of five or 446 more dwelling units if the borrower is an individual or the 447 lender is a noninstitutional investor. 448 Section 8. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.