SD HB1206 | 2011 | Regular Session
Status
Spectrum: Strong Partisan Bill (Republican 10-1)
Status: Introduced on January 31 2011 - 25% progression, died in chamber
Action: 2011-02-17 - No motion to reconsider H.J. 444
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF]
Status: Introduced on January 31 2011 - 25% progression, died in chamber
Action: 2011-02-17 - No motion to reconsider H.J. 444
Text: Latest bill text (Introduced) [PDF]
Summary
Revise certain provisions relating to grandparent visitation and to declare an emergency.
Title
Revise certain provisions relating to grandparent visitation and to declare an emergency.
Sponsors
Roll Calls
House - House of Representatives Do Pass Amended (Y: 30 N: 36 NV: 0 Abs: 4) [FAIL]
House - House of Representatives Reconsidered (Y: 36 N: 30 NV: 0 Abs: 4) [PASS]
House - House of Representatives Do Pass (Y: 37 N: 32 NV: 0 Abs: 1) [FAIL]
House - House Judiciary Do Pass (Y: 8 N: 3 NV: 0 Abs: 2) [PASS]
House - House of Representatives Reconsidered (Y: 36 N: 30 NV: 0 Abs: 4) [PASS]
House - House of Representatives Do Pass (Y: 37 N: 32 NV: 0 Abs: 1) [FAIL]
House - House Judiciary Do Pass (Y: 8 N: 3 NV: 0 Abs: 2) [PASS]
History
Date | Chamber | Action |
---|---|---|
2011-02-17 | No motion to reconsider H.J. 444 | |
2011-02-16 | Intent to reconsider H.J. 418 | |
2011-02-16 | House of Representatives Do Pass Amended, Failed, YEAS 30, NAYS 36. H.J. 417 | |
2011-02-16 | House of Representatives Motion to amend, Passed H.J. 417 Amendment 1206ra | |
2011-02-16 | House of Representatives Reconsidered, Passed, YEAS 36, NAYS 30. H.J. 416 | |
2011-02-15 | Intent to reconsider H.J. 399 | |
2011-02-15 | House of Representatives Do Pass, Failed, YEAS 37, NAYS 32. H.J. 399 | |
2011-02-14 | House of Representatives Deferred to another day, Passed H.J. 384 | |
2011-02-10 | House of Representatives Deferred to another day, Passed H.J. 359 | |
2011-02-09 | Judiciary Do Pass, Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 3. H.J. 344 | |
2011-02-09 | Scheduled for hearing | |
2011-01-31 | First read in House and referred to House Judiciary H.J. 217 |