Bill Text: CA AB2193 | 2023-2024 | Regular Session | Introduced
NOTE: There are more recent revisions of this legislation. Read Latest Draft
Bill Title: Hazing: educational institutions: prohibition and civil liability: reports and resources.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)
Status: (Passed) 2024-09-27 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 704, Statutes of 2024. [AB2193 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB2193-Introduced.html
Bill Title: Hazing: educational institutions: prohibition and civil liability: reports and resources.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 2-0)
Status: (Passed) 2024-09-27 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 704, Statutes of 2024. [AB2193 Detail]
Download: California-2023-AB2193-Introduced.html
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 2193
| Introduced by Assembly Member Holden |
February 07, 2024 |
An act to add Sections 32050 and 32051 to the Education Code, relating to hazing.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2193, as introduced, Holden.
Hazing: educational institutions: civil liability: resources.
Existing law makes it unlawful to engage in hazing, which is defined as a method of initiation or preinitiation into a student organization or student body, whether or not the organization or body is officially recognized by an educational institution, that is likely to cause serious bodily injury to a former, current, or prospective student of a school, community college, college, university, or other educational institution in the state. Existing law establishes civil liability for hazing participants or the organization if it is involved in the hazing.
This bill would, beginning January 1, 2025, additionally establish civil liability for an educational institution, which the bill would define as a public or private institution of higher education in the state, if (1) the institution has direct involvement in the hazing practices of the
organization, knew or should have known of the hazing practices and failed to take reasonable steps to stop the hazing practices, or unreasonably failed to prevent or discover the hazing practices of the organization, and (2) the organization involved in the hazing is affiliated with the educational institution at the time of the alleged hazing incident. For purposes of determining whether an educational institution “knew or should have known of the hazing practices and failed to take reasonable steps to stop the hazing practices, or unreasonably failed to prevent or discover the hazing practices of the organization,” the bill would require consideration to be given to the extent that the institution had specific antihazing measures in place at the time of the alleged hazing incident.
This bill would also require the State Department of Education to make available on the department’s internet website, on or before July 1, 2025, a model antihazing policy for local
educational agencies and resources on hazing prevention for professional development purposes and to increase awareness among pupils, school staff, and community members of the dangers of hazing.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NOBill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 32050 is added to the Education Code, immediately following the heading of Article 5 of Chapter 1 of Part 19 of Division 1 of Title 1, to read:32050.
(a) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) “Affiliated” means currently recognized or sanctioned by the educational institution. For purposes of this section, an organization that had previously been recognized or sanctioned by the educational institution but has subsequently had that recognition or sanction withdrawn shall not be considered affiliated.
(2) “Educational institution” means a public or private institution of higher education in the state. The term includes the officers, employees, or governing bodies of the institution.
(3) “Hazing” means a method of initiation or
preinitiation into a student organization or student body that is likely to cause serious bodily injury to a former, current, or prospective student of an educational institution. “Hazing” does not include customary athletic events or school-sanctioned events.
(b) Beginning January 1, 2025, a person against whom hazing is directed may commence a civil action for injury or damages. In addition to bringing an action against any participants in the hazing or the organization pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 245.6 of the Penal Code, an action may be brought against any educational institution for the hazing practices of the organization involving one or more students if both of the following apply:
(1) The educational institution has direct involvement in the hazing practices of the organization, knew or should have known of the hazing practices and failed to take reasonable
steps to stop the hazing practice, or unreasonably failed to prevent or discover the hazing practices of the organization.
(2) At the time of the alleged hazing incident, the organization involved in the hazing is affiliated with the educational institution.
(c) For purposes of determining under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) whether an educational institution “should have known of the hazing practices and failed to take reasonable steps to stop the hazing practice, or unreasonably failed to prevent or discover the hazing practices of the organization,” consideration shall be given to the extent that the institution, at the time of the alleged hazing incident, had each of the following measures in place:
(1) Adoption and distribution of a written antihazing policy consisting of rules and procedures for hazing
prevention, intervention, and discipline, including all of the following:
(A) Prohibition on hazing.
(B) Notice of how violations will be enforced.
(C) Requirements for the reporting of potential hazing.
(D) Examples of unacceptable activities and behaviors.
(E) Required education and training, as described in paragraph (3).
(F) Annual distribution of the policy by means other than online posting.
(G) Designation of at least one employee to oversee the implementation of the antihazing policy.
(H) Posting the antihazing policy online in a readily accessible and prominent location on the educational institution’s internet website in a manner that is easily accessible to the public.
(2) Implementation of a reasonable antihazing investigation, enforcement, and reporting program that includes all of the following:
(A) Gathering confidential data about student experiences with hazing with affiliated student organizations.
(B) Incorporation of the data gathered under subparagraph (A) to build or refine institution-specific hazing prevention strategies.
(C) A reasonable and good faith process for diligently investigating and responding to reports of hazing in a timely manner.
(D) Documentation of investigations required by subparagraph (C).
(E) Enforcing hazing violations with appropriate penalties, including fines, withholding diplomas or transcripts, discipline such as probation, suspension, or dismissal, and rescission of permission for an affiliated student organization to operate on campus property or be affiliated with the educational institution.
(F) Reporting of hazing incidents to law enforcement or other appropriate third parties when applicable.
(G) Annual reporting online in a readily accessible and prominent location on the institution’s internet website on past hazing violations without disclosing personal identifying information of students.
(3) Implementation of a reasonable institutionwide
antihazing education and training program that does all of the following:
(A) Aligns with the educational institution in having a primary concern for student safety.
(B) Reinforces that all students, faculty, and staff are responsible for following reporting procedures when they notice hazing.
(C) Requires training on antihazing policies, early intervention, reporting, and creating a safe school environment.
(d) A civil action brought under this section or Section 245.6 of the Penal Code may seek damages for emotional injuries as a component of actual damages, in addition to any other remedies available under law, including, but not limited to, damages for bodily injury or harm.
(e) This
section does not prohibit or limit any other potential cause of action under any other law that is available to a person against whom hazing is directed.
SEC. 2.
Section 32051 is added to the Education Code, to read:32051.
(a) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) “Hazing” means a method of initiation or preinitiation into a student organization or student body that is likely to cause serious bodily injury to a former, current, or prospective pupil of a school. “Hazing” does not include customary athletic events or school-sanctioned events.
(2) “School” means a public or private school in the state maintaining kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive.
(b) On or before July 1, 2025, the department shall make available on the department’s internet website both of the following:
(1) A model antihazing policy for local educational agencies.
(2) Resources on hazing prevention for professional development purposes and for increasing awareness among pupils, school staff, and community members of the dangers of hazing.
(c) Schools are encouraged to use the resources made available by the department pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) for professional development purposes and for increasing awareness among pupils, school staff, and community members of the dangers of hazing.
